On the Strength of the Reason Against Harming

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy
View More View Less
  • 1 Bowling Green State University

According to action-relative accounts of harming, an action harms someone only if it makes her worse off in some respect than she would have been, had the action not been performed. Action-relative accounts can be contrasted with effect-relative accounts, which hold that an action may harm an individual in virtue of its effects on that individual, regardless of whether the individual would have been better off in the absence of the action. In this paper, I argue that our judgments about the strength of the reason against harming lend support to effect-relative accounts over action-relative accounts. I first criticize Fiona Woollard’s argument for the claim that an effect-relative account of harming could ground only a weak reason against harming. I then argue for a set of three principles that can be conjoined with an effect-relative account to explain the strength of the reason against harming.

  • Adams Robert (1972), “Must God Create the Best?” The Philosophical Review, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 317332.

  • Boonin David (2008), “How to Solve the Non-Identity Problem,” Public Affairs Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 127157.

  • Boonin David (2015) The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Feinberg Joel (1984) Harm to Others (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Gardner Molly (2015), “A Harm-Based Solution to the Non-Identity Problem,” Ergo, vol. 2, no. 17, pp. 427–444.

    • Export Citation
  • Greene Mark, and Augello Steven (2011), “Everworse: What’s Wrong with Selecting for Disability?Public Affairs Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 131139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harman Elizabeth (2004) “Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating?Philosophical Perspectives 18, pp. 89113.

  • Harman Elizabeth (2009) “Harming as Causing Harm,” in Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem, ed. Melinda Roberts and David Wasserman (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 137154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heyd David, (2009) “The Intractability of the Nonidentity Problem,” in Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem, ed. Roberts Melinda, and Wasserman David (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klockseim Justin (2012), “A Defense of the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm,” American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4): 285300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norcross Alastair. (2005), “Harming in Context,” Philosophical Studies 123, pp. 149173.

  • Parfit Derek, (1976) “On Doing the Best for Our Children,” in Ethics and Population, ed. Bayles Michael (Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman), pp. 100102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parfit Derek (1987) Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Schwartz Thomas, , “Obligations to Posterity,” in Obligations to Future Generations, ed. Sikora Richard, and Barry Brian (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1978), pp. 313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shiffrin Seana (1999) “Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm,” Legal Theory, vol. 5, pp. 11748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomson Judith (2011) “More on the Metaphysics of Harm,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 436458.

  • Weinberg Justin (2013) “Non-Identity Matters, SometimesUtilitas 26 (1): 111.

  • Woollard Fiona, (2012) “Have We Solved the Non-Identity Problem?Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 677690.

  • 1

     See Fiona Woollard (2012).

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 302 124 11
Full Text Views 190 27 3
PDF Downloads 31 9 1