Disaster and Debate

in Journal of Moral Philosophy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Faced with a national tragedy, citizens respond in different ways. Some will initiate debate about the possible connections between this tragedy and broader moral and political issues. But others often complain that this is too early, that it is inappropriate to debate such larger issues while ‘the bodies are still warm.’ This paper critically examines the grounds for such a complaint. We consider different interpretations of the complaint—cynical, epistemic, and ethical—and argue that it can be resisted on all of these readings. Debate shortly after a national disaster is therefore permissible. We then set out a political argument in favor of early debate based on the value of broad political participation in liberal democracies and sketch a stronger argument, based on the duty to support just institutions, that would support a political duty to engage in debate shortly after tragedies have occurred.

Disaster and Debate

in Journal of Moral Philosophy



Ackerman B. and Fishkin J. (2004). Deliberation DayYale University Press.

Arneson R. (2003). ‘Debate: Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic LegitimacyJournal of Political Philosophy111.

Benhabib S. 2004The Rights of Others: Aliens Residents and Citizens. CUP.

Bloom P. (2013). ‘The Baby in the Well: The Case Against Empathy.’ New YorkerMay 20.

Brennan J. (2011). The Ethics of VotingPUP.

Bruni F. (2015) ‘The Exploitation of ParisNYTNov. 14 2015.

Caplan B. (2007). The Myth of the Rational VoterPUP.

Christiano T. (2006). ‘DemocracyStanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophywww.plato.stanford/edu/entries/democracy/ (accessed 27.6.2016).

Dalton R.J. (2008) ‘Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participationPolitical Studies vol. 56: 7698.

Estlund D. (2008). ‘Introduction: Epistemic Approaches to DemocracyEpisteme.

Fine S. (2011) ‘Democracy, Citizenship and the Bits in BetweenCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Fishkin J. (1997). The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. Yale University Press.

Friedman R.P. and James J.W. (1998). The Grief Recovery Handbook. NY: HarperCollins.

Greenspan P.S. (2004). ‘Practical Reasoning and Emotion.’ In Mele & Rawling (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. OUP.

Helm B.W. (2001). Emotional Reason: Deliberation Motivation and the Nature of Value. CUP.

Jenni K. and Loewenstein G. (1997). ‘Explaining the “Identifiable Victim Effect”.’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14.

Kübler-Ross E. (1969) On Death and DyingLondon: Routledge.

Landler and Goode (2012) ‘Obama’s Cautious Call for Action Sets Stage to Revive Gun Debate,NYT14 Dec 2012.

Lattanzi-Licht M.E. and Doka K.J. 2003Coping with Public TragedyPsychology Press.

Lerner J.S. Gonzalez R.M. Small D.A. Fischhoff B. 2003. ‘Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism’ Psychological Science42144150.

List C. and Goodin R. (2001). ‘Epistemic Democracy: Generalising the Condorcet Jury Theorem,Journal of Political Philosophy.

Macedo S. et al. (2005). Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It. Brookings Institution Press.

Moller D. (2009). ‘Meta-Reasoning and Practical DeliberationPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Montalvo J.G. 2011. ‘Voting after the Bombings: A Natural Experiment on the Effects of Terrorist Attacks on Democratic Elections.’ The Review of Economics and Statistics 93: 411461154.

Nagel T. (1995) Equality and PartialityOUP.

Norris P. (2002) Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum M. (1992) Love’s KnowledgeOUP.

Pateman C. (1970). Participation and Democratic TheoryCUP.

Peter F. 2013. ‘The Human Right to Political ParticipationJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy7.

Posner R. (2003). Law Pragmatism and DemocracyHUP.

Prinz J. (2011). ‘Against Empathy.’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 49.

Putnam R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Renewal of American Community. Simon & Schuster.

Rawls 1999A Theory of JusticeHUP.

Scheffler S. (2005). ‘Egalitarian Liberalism as Moral Pluralism,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary79.

Shapiro I. (2003). The State of Democratic TheoryPUP.

Somin I. (1998). ‘Voter Ignorance and the Democratic IdealCritical review 12 (4) pp. 413458.

Sunstein C. (2002). ‘The Law of Group PolarizationJournal of Political Philosophy vol. 10 (2).

R. Talisse (2004). ‘Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy?Critical Review 16 (4).

Van Parijs P. (1996). ‘Is Democracy Compatible with Justice?Journal of Political Philosophy4.

Velleman J.D. (1988). ‘Brandt’s Definition of ‘Good’.’ Philosophical Review 97: 353371.

Verba Schlozman and Brady (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. HUP.

Wattenberg M. (2006) Is Voting for the Young? Longman.

Young I.M. (2000). Inclusion and DemocracyOUP.

Zukin et al. (2006). A New Engagement? Political Participation Civic Life and the Changing American Citizen. OUP.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 38 23
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 6 6 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0