Save

Streumer on Non-Cognitivism and Reductivism About Normative Judgement

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy
Author:
Daan Evers Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, The Netherlands h.w.a.evers@rug.nl

Search for other papers by Daan Evers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Bart Streumer believes that the following principle is true of all normative judgements:

(A) When two people make conflicting normative judgements, at most one of them is correct. Streumer argues that noncognitivists are unable to explain why (A) is true, or our acceptance of it. I argue that his arguments are inconclusive. I also argue that our acceptance of (A) is limited in the case of instrumental and epistemic normative judgements, and that the extent to which we do accept (A) for such judgements can be explained by an assumption of shared standards of correctness. Finally, I argue that reductivists can appeal to the same ideas to defend their view that instrumental and epistemic normative judgements describe non-normative relations.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 358 64 9
Full Text Views 36 4 1
PDF Views & Downloads 43 8 2