Save

Self-defence among Innocent People

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy
Author:
Gerhard ØverlandThe Ethics Programme, University of Oslo, Norway, Email: gerhard.overland@filosofi.uio.no

Search for other papers by Gerhard Øverland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

I explain the asymmetry between innocent aggressors and their (innocent) victims, and attempt to separate justified and unjustified defensive force when both parties are innocent. I propose the principle of initiating behaviour, which states that: ‘In order for one person to be justified in using defensive force the other party must initiate the apparently threatening behaviour, but the defendant’s interpretation of that behaviour, as being threatening, would have to be reasonable.’ We can thereby maintain the view that there is a significant relation between an act being justified and which party ought eventually to be given priority in a conflict situation. If we know that an act is justified, we know that we have to give preference to its agent when there is a choice between imposing equal harm on him or her and his or her victim.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 206 50 5
Full Text Views 70 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 38 7 1