Save

Cognitive Biases and Moral Luck

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy
Authors:
Ehud Guttel
Search for other papers by Ehud Guttel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
David Enoch
Search for other papers by David Enoch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Some of the recent philosophical literature on moral luck attempts to make headway in the moral-luck debate by employing the resources of empirical psychology, in effect arguing that some of the intuitive judgments relevant to the moral-luck debate are best explained – and so presumably explained away – as the output of well-documented cognitive biases. We argue that such attempts are empirically problematic, and furthermore that even if they were not, it is still not at all clear what philosophical significance they would have.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 717 45 4
Full Text Views 192 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 136 15 1