Moral Perception and the Reliability Challenge

in Journal of Moral Philosophy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Given a traditional intuitionist moral epistemology, it is notoriously difficult for moral realists to explain the reliability of our moral beliefs. This has led some to go looking for an alternative to intuitionism. Perception is an obvious contender. I previously argued that this is a dead end, that all moral perception is dependent on a priori moral knowledge. This suggests that perceptualism merely moves the bump in the rug where the reliability challenge is concerned. Preston Werner responds that my account rests on an overly intellectualized model of perception. In this paper, I argue that though Werner may well be correct, my arguments, properly extended, still suggest that perceptualism leaves realists in no better position than intuitionism when it comes to the reliability challenge.

Moral Perception and the Reliability Challenge

in Journal of Moral Philosophy



Crow D. 2016. “The Mystery of Moral Perception.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2): 187210.

Enoch D. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford University Press.

Faraci D. 2015. “A Hard Look at Moral Perception.” Philosophical Studies no. 172: 20552072.

Field H. 1989. Realism, Mathematics, and Modality . Oxforduk; New York nyusa: Blackwell.

Fitelson B. 2010. “Strengthening the Case for Knowledge from Falsehood.” Analysis 70 (4): 66669.

Greene J. 2008. “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul.” In Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality edited by Sinnott-Armstrong W. 3579. mit Press.

Harman G. 1977. The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Oxford University Pressusa.

Kahane G. 2014. “Intuitive and Counterintuitive Morality.” In Moral Psychology & Moral Agency: Philosophical Essays on the Science of Ethics edited by D’Arms J. and Jacobson D. 939. Oxford University Press.

Singer P. 2005. “Ethics and Intuitions.” Journal of Ethics 9: 33152.

Street S. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109166.

Warfield T. 2005. “Knowledge from Falsehood.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 40516.

Werner P.J. forthcoming. “Moral Perception Without (Prior) Moral Knowledge.” Journal of Moral Philosophy. doi: 10.1163/17455243-46810075.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 8
Full Text Views 13 13 13
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0