Negative Partiality

in Journal of Moral Philosophy
Beschränkter Zugang
Zugriff auf gesamten Text erhalten
Auf DeepDyve mieten

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

At the outset of the Republic, Polemarchus advances the bold thesis that “justice is the art which gives benefit to friends and injury to enemies”. He quickly rejects the hypothesis, and what follows is a long tradition of neglecting the ethics of enmity. The parallel issue of how friendship (and other positive relationships) affects the moral sphere has, by contrast, been greatly illuminated by discussions both ancient and contemporary. This article connects this existing work to the less explored topic of the normative significance of our negative relationships. I explain how negative partiality should be conceptualized through reference to the positive analogue, and argue that at least some forms of negative partiality are justified. I further explore the connection between positive and negative relationships by showing how both are justified by ongoing histories of encounter (though of different kinds). However, I also argue that these relationships are in some important ways asymmetrical (i.e. friendship is not the mirror image of enmity).

Negative Partiality

in Journal of Moral Philosophy

Überschriften

Verweisliste

  • Blundell Mary . Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press1989.

  • Broad C.D. Self and Others.” Broad's Critical Essays in Moral Philosophy. Ed. David Cheney. New York: Humanities Press1971.

  • Douglas Thomas . “Parental partiality and the intergenerational transmission of advantage.” Philosophical Studies 172.10 (2015): 27352756.

  • Hurka Thomas . “The Justification of National Partiality.” The Morality of Nationalism. Eds. Robert McKim and Jeff McMahan. New York: Oxford University Press 1997139157.

  • Jeske Diane . “Families, friends, and special obligations.” Canadian journal of philosophy 28.4 (1998): 527555.

  • Jollimore Troy . “Friendship without partiality?Ratio 13.1 (2000): 6982.

  • Keller Simon . Partiality. Princeton University Press2013.

  • Kolnai Aurel . “Forgiveness.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (1973): 91106.

  • Kolodny Niko . “Which Relationships Justify Partiality? The Case of Parents and Children.” Philosophy & Public Affairs. 38.1 (2010).

  • Lord Errol . “Justifying Partiality.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19.3 (2016): 569590.

  • Miller David . “Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8.1–2 (2005): 6381.

  • Murphy Jeffrie . “Getting Even: The role of the Victim.” Social Philosophy and Policy 7.2 (1990): 209225.

  • Plato. The Dialogues of Plato. 4th ed. translated by Benjamin Jowett Oxford University Press 1964.

  • Scheffler Samuel . The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions. Oxford: Clarendon Press1984.

  • Stroud Sarah . “Permissible Partiality, Projects, and Plural Agency.” Partiality and Impartiality: Morality Special Relationships and the Wider World. Eds. Feltham Brian & Cottingham John . Oxford: Oxford University press2010. 131149.

    • Über Google Scholar suchen
    • Zitierung exportieren
  • Weinstock Daniel . “National Partiality: Confronting the Intuitions.” The Monist 82.3 (1999): 516541.

  • Whiting Jennifer . “Impersonal friends.” The Monist 74.1 (1991): 329.

Index Card

Kennzahlen

Kennzahlen

Insgesamt Im letzten Jahr In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen 758 758 22
Gesamttextansichten 1241 1241 0
PDF-Downloads 11 11 0
EPUB-Downloads 1 1 0