Is the Use of Averaging in Advice Taking Modulated by Culture?

in Journal of Cognition and Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Many recent experiments have explored the way people take advice into account. It has been observed that in so doing participants often rely on one of the two following strategies: averaging between the different opinions or choosing one of the opinions, as opposed to using more complex weighting strategies. While several factors that affect strategy choice have been investigated, no attention has been paid to potential cultural variations. Among the many relevant cross-cultural differences, results have show that Easterners tend to favor compromise more than Westerners, a difference that could translate into a greater preference for averaging in Eastern population. In Experiment 1, we confronted Japanese and French participants to two pieces of advice and asked them to form an aggregate answer. In Experiment 2, participants had to aggregate their own opinion and a piece of advice. In neither of the experiments were the Japanese more likely to use averaging than the French. Explanations for this robust absence of difference are suggested. The only difference that emerged was that the Japanese were more likely to choose the advice and less likely to choose their own answer than the French. Different interpretations of this result are discussed, including the possibility that it is an artefact of a theoretically irrelevant difference between the populations under study.

Is the Use of Averaging in Advice Taking Modulated by Culture?

in Journal of Cognition and Culture

Sections

References

ArielyD. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions 2008 Harper, New York, NY.

ArielyD.LevavJ. Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed Journal of Consumer Research 2000 27 279 290

BonaccioS.DalalR. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006 101 127 151

BrileyD.MorrisM.SimonsonI. Reasons as carriers of culture: Dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision making Journal of Consumer Research 2000 27 157 178

HussB. Cultural differences and the law of noncontradiction: some criteria for further research Philosophical Psychology 2004 17 375 389

LarrickR.SollJ. Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle Management Science 2006 52 111 127

MercierH. On the universality of argumentative reasoning Journal of Cognition and Culture 2011 11 85 113

MinsonJ. A.LibermanV.RossL. Two to tango: effects of collaborative experience and disagreement on dyadic judgment Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011 37 1325 1338

PengK.NisbettR. Culture, dialectics and reasoning about contradiction American Psychologist 1999 54 741 754

SollJ. Intuitive theories of information: Beliefs about the value of redundancy Cognitive Psychology 1999 38 317 346

SollJ.LarrickR. Strategies for Revising Judgment: How (and How Well) People Use Others’ Opinions Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2009 35 780 805

TriandisH. C.SuhE. M. Cultural influences on personality Annual Review of Psychology 2002 53 133 160

Van der HenstJ.MercierH.YamaH.KawasakiY.AdachiK. Dealing with contradiction in a communicative context: A cross-cultural study Intercultural Pragmatics 2007 3 487 502

WuS.KeysarB. The effect of culture on perspective taking Psychological Science 2007 18 600

YamagishiT.KiyonariT. The group as the container of generalized reciprocity Social Psychology Quarterly 2000 63 116 132

YanivI. Weighting and trimming: Heuristics for aggregating judgments under uncertainty Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997 69 237 249

YanivI. Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2004 93 1 13

YanivI.KleinbergerE. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000 83 260 281

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Proportions of answers in each category, Experiment 1.
  • View in gallery
    Distribution of the answers in experiment 2 (Japan, N=678; France, N=876).
  • View in gallery
    Proportions of strategy use averaged by participant (Japan, N=51; France, N=64).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 10
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0