Using Geometrical Representations as Cognitive Technologies
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureGraduate School of Education 1501 Tolman Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, ca 94720-1670 USA
Search for other papers by Kenton de Kirby in
Current site
Google Scholar
* Corresponding author, e-mail: kenton@dekirby.net
Search for other papers by Geoffrey B. Saxe in
Current site
Google Scholar
In this article we provide a treatment of geometric diagrams as a semiotic ‘technology’ in mathematics education. To this end, we review two classroom observations and one experimental study that illuminate the potential for communicative breakdown in the use of this technology, as well as possibilities for mitigating the breakdown. In the classroom observations, we show that rather than ‘seeing through’ the diagrams to the idealized mathematical objects (a pervasive semiotic practice in academic mathematics), upper-elementary grade students may treat the misleading appearances of the diagrams as mathematically significant. We argue that one source of such communicative breakdowns is that the ‘rules’ for using the semiotic technology are rarely made explicit in classrooms. In the experimental study, we review findings showing that when students’ have access to mathematical definitions that distinguish between the diagram and the idealized mathematical object (e.g., a diagram of a mathematical point is the size of a small dot, but a true mathematical point has no size), they are less likely to rely on the misleading appearances of the diagrams; we also found that this effect increases over grade level. The issues explored in this article suggest that upper elementary students could benefit from explicit treatment of definitional practices in academic mathematics. At a broader theoretical level, the findings serve to emphasize the potential for any semiotic technology to have multiple meanings and the role of active sense making in communications with and about technologies.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
de Kirby K. & Saxe G. B. Idealized objects and material diagrams: Definition use in early geometrical problem solving 2013 UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA Unpublished manuscript
-
Dörfler W. Cobb P., Yackel E. & McClain K. Means for meaning Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms; Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design 2000 Mahwah NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 99 131
-
Fischbein E. The theory of figural concepts Educational Studies in Mathematics 1993 24 139 162
-
Font V. & Contreras Á. The problem of the particular and its relation to the general in mathematics education Educational Studies in Mathematics 2008 69 33 52
-
Goodnow J. J., Miller P. J. & Kessel F. Cultural practices as contexts for development 1995 San Francisco CA. Jossey-Bass
-
Lave J. & Wenger E. Situated learning 1991 New York NY. Cambridge University Press
-
Mesquita A. L. On conceptual obstacles linked with external representation in geometry The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 1998 17 183 195
-
Peirce C. S. On the algebra of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation American Journal of Mathematics 1885 7 180 196
-
Radford L. The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge For the Learning of Mathematics 2002 22 14 23
-
Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context 1990 New York NY. Oxford University Press
-
Rogoff B. The cultural nature of human development 2003 Oxford Oxford University Press
-
Saxe G. B. Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding 1991 Hillsdale NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
-
Saxe G. B. Demetriou A. & Raftopoulos A. Practices of quantification from a socio-cultural perspective Cognitive Developmental Change: Theories, Models and Measurement 2004 New York NY. Cambridge University Press 241 263
-
Saxe G. B. Cultural development of mathematical ideas: Papua New Guinea studies 2012 New York NY. Cambridge University Press
-
Saxe G. B., Guberman S. R. & Gearhart M. Social processes in early number development Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1987 52 Ann Arbor MI. Society for Research in Child Development Serial No. 162
-
Scribner S. & Cole M. The psychology of literacy 1981 Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press
-
Sfard A. Cobb P., Yackel E. & McClain K. Symbolizing mathematical reality into being – or how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects create each other Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design 2000 Mahwah NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 37 98
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 316 | 65 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 138 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 5 | 0 |
Using Geometrical Representations as Cognitive Technologies
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureGraduate School of Education 1501 Tolman Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, ca 94720-1670 USA
Search for other papers by Kenton de Kirby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
* Corresponding author, e-mail: kenton@dekirby.net
Search for other papers by Geoffrey B. Saxe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In this article we provide a treatment of geometric diagrams as a semiotic ‘technology’ in mathematics education. To this end, we review two classroom observations and one experimental study that illuminate the potential for communicative breakdown in the use of this technology, as well as possibilities for mitigating the breakdown. In the classroom observations, we show that rather than ‘seeing through’ the diagrams to the idealized mathematical objects (a pervasive semiotic practice in academic mathematics), upper-elementary grade students may treat the misleading appearances of the diagrams as mathematically significant. We argue that one source of such communicative breakdowns is that the ‘rules’ for using the semiotic technology are rarely made explicit in classrooms. In the experimental study, we review findings showing that when students’ have access to mathematical definitions that distinguish between the diagram and the idealized mathematical object (e.g., a diagram of a mathematical point is the size of a small dot, but a true mathematical point has no size), they are less likely to rely on the misleading appearances of the diagrams; we also found that this effect increases over grade level. The issues explored in this article suggest that upper elementary students could benefit from explicit treatment of definitional practices in academic mathematics. At a broader theoretical level, the findings serve to emphasize the potential for any semiotic technology to have multiple meanings and the role of active sense making in communications with and about technologies.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 316 | 65 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 138 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 5 | 0 |