The Effect of Immediate and Lifetime Experience of Reading Horizontal and Vertical Texts on Chinese Speakers’ Temporal Orientation

in Journal of Cognition and Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The present study examined participants’ performance on a temporal judgment task while holding language constant but varying their lifetime and immediate reading experience of horizontal and vertical texts. Chinese participants from Taiwan and China were randomly assigned to a reading task involving horizontally or vertically arranged texts. A temporal judgment task (spatial-temporal association of response codes or starc) followed the reading task, asking the participants to judge if the event depicted in a second picture occurred earlier or later than that in a first picture. Responses were faster when the left keys represented the ‘earlier’ responses than when the right keys did (a starc effect). Half of the participants responded with horizontally oriented keys while the rest with vertically oriented keys. For the Taiwan participants, the overall starc effect was greater when the response keys were vertical than horizontal, but no difference was observed for the China participants. A questionnaire indicates that the two groups of participants had similar lifetime experiences of reading horizontal texts, but the Taiwan participants read vertical texts in their life far more frequently than the China participants. Immediate reading experiences interacted with lifetime experiences in modulating the vertical bias. For the Taiwan participants, the vertical bias was strong following the vertical prime, but disappeared following the horizontal prime. For the China participants, the horizontal prime led to no vertical bias whereas the vertical prime brought about a horizontal bias. We conclude that the directionality of orthography and speakers’ immediate and lifetime reading experiences can better explain the vertical bias (or the lack of it) in the Chinese speakers’ temporal thinking. The findings, however, may be interpreted as constituting a different manifestation of linguistic relativity and recast under a broader framework of the extended-mind hypothesis of human cognition.



BellerS.RotheA.HütherL.BenderA. Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference? Frontiers in Cultural Psychology 2012 3 486

BoroditskyL. Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time Cognitive Psychology 2001 43 1 22

BoroditskyL.FuhrmanO.McCormickK. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 2011 118 123 129

ChanT.-T.BergenB. BaraB.BarsalouL.BucciarelliM. Writing direction influences spatial cognition Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2005 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 412 417

ChenJ.-Y. Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky Cognition 2007 104 427 436 (2001)

ChenJ.-Y.ChuangC.-Y. LoveB.C.McRaeK.SloutskyV.M. Experience with a computer word-entry method in processing Chinese characters by fluent typists Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2008 Austin, TX Cognitive Science Society 487 492

ChenJ.-Y.O’SeaghdhaP.G. Do Mandarin and English speakers think about time differently? Review of existing evidence and some new data Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2013 41 338 358

ChenJ.-Y.SuJ.-J. Differential sensitivity to the gender of a person by English and Chinese speakers Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2011 40 195 203

ChenJ.-Y.SuJ.-J.LeeC.-Y.O’SeaghdhaP.G. Linguistically directed attention to the temporal aspect of action events in monolingual English speakers and Chinese-English bilingual speakers with varying English proficiency Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2012 15 413 421

ChenJ.-Y.SuJ.-J.O’SeaghdhaP.G. Enduring moments: The extended present in Chinese speakers’ orientation to event time Journal of Pragmatics 2013 45 90 103

ClarkA.ChalmersD.J. The extended mind Analysis 1998 58 7 19

DavidoffJ.DaviesI.RobertsonD. Colour categories in a stone-age tribe Nature 1999 402 604 605

DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993 122 371 396

DevittM.SterelnyK. Language and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of language 1987 Oxford Blackwell

FuhrmanO.BoroditskyL. Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit non-linguistic task Cognitive Science 2010 34 1430 1451

FuhrmanO.McCormickK.ChenE.JiangH.ShuD.MaoS.BoroditskyL. How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D Cognitive Science 2011 35 1305 1328

GilbertA.L.RegierT.KayP.IvryR.B. Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006 103 489 494

HuntE.AgnoliF. The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive psychology perspective Psychological Review 1991 98 377 389

JanuaryD.KakoE. Re-evaluating evidence for the linguistic relativity hypothesis: Response to Boroditsky Cognition 2007 104 417 426 (2001)

MilesL.K.TanL.NobleG.D.LumsdenJ.MacraeC.N. Can a mind have two time lines? Exploring space – time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2011 18 598 604

NormanD. CarrollJ.M. Cognitive artifacts Designing Interaction 1991 New York, NY Cambridge University Press 17 38

OuelletM.SantiagoJ.IsraeliZ.GabayS. Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology 2010 57 308 314

PinkerS. The Language Instinct 1994 New York, NY Harper Perrenial RoseJ.C.ChenJ.-Y. Chinese speakers do not think about time differently than Portuguese speakers 2011 November Poster presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society Seattle, WA

TomaselloM. The cultural origins of human cognition 1999 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press

TseC.-S.AltarribaJ. Evidence against linguistic relativity in Chinese and English: A case study of spatial and temporal metaphors Journal of Cognition and Culture 2008 8 335 357

TverskyB.KugelmassS.WinterA. Crosscultural and developmental trends in graphic productions Cognitive Psychology 1991 23 515 557

WhorfB.L. CarrollJ.B. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf 1956 Cambridge, MA The MIT Press

WinawerJ.WitthoftN.FrankM.C.WuL.WadeA.R.BoroditskyL. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007 104 7780 7785

ZebianS. Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The snarc effect and the reverse snarc effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers Journal of Cognition and Culture 2005 5 165 190



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 2
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0