A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Japanese Experiences of Personal and Vicarious Shame

in Journal of Cognition and Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The purpose of this study was to examine cultural influences on shame. In particular, the focus was to assess the influence of the following factors on the object of shame (specifically, personal vs. vicarious shame): (1) the effect of individualism/collectivism, measured by a widely used standardized measurement; (2) the role of tightness/looseness (based on ecological factors); and (3) the patterns of within- and between-cultural differences and similarities. Data were collected from two American and two Japanese universities to test within- and between-cultural influences on the object of shame. Participants were asked to describe and rate three autobiographical experiences of shame, with each successive request being increasingly specific in asking for shame about something for which the participant did not feel responsible. Cultural differences in tightness and looseness, both within and between the two nations, were predictive of the likelihood that participants would report vicarious shame. In contrast, standard measures of individualism-collectivism did not predict these differences. These findings suggest that culture affects the object of shame. However, in contrast to our hypothesis, attitudinal measures of individualism/collectivism were not a significant predictor. Rather, tightness/looseness determined by ecological factors was the better predictor of some cultural differences on the object of shame. Furthermore, these findings imply that attitudinal measures of individualism/collectivism may not agree with ecological measures, and that including multiple samples from each language/nation effectively reduces the confound between culture and language.

A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Japanese Experiences of Personal and Vicarious Shame

in Journal of Cognition and Culture



BedfordO.HwangK. Guilt and shame in Chinese culture: A cross-cultural framework from the perspective of morality and identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 2003 33 127 144

BondM. H. Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede’s ecological analysis – A 20-year odyssey: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin 2002 128 73 77

CarpenterS. Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions. Cross-Cultural Research 2000 34 38 56

CrystalD. S.ParrottW. G.OkazakiY.WatanabeH. Examining relations between shame and personality among university students in the United States and Japan: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2001 25 113 123

De RiveraJ. Comparing experiences across cultures: Shame and guilt in American and Japanese. Hiroshima Forum for Psychology 1989 14 13 20

DolanR. E.WordenR. L. Japan: A country study 1992 Washington, DC Federal Research Division, Library of Congress (Electronic version)

EmberC. R.EmberM. Anthropology 1985 4th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall

FesslerD. M. T. Shame in two cultures: Implications for evolutionary approaches. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2004 4 207 262

FiskeA. P. Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002) Psychological Bulletin 2002 128 78 88

FontaineJ. R. J. Untying the Gordian know of guilt and shame: The structure of guilt and shame reactions based on situation and person variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2006 37 273 292

HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.PengK.GreenholtzJ. What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert Scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 82 903 918

HofsteadG. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values 1980 Beverly Hills, CA Sage

Hurtado de MendozaA.Fernández-DolsJ. M.ParrottW. G.CarreraP. Emotion terms, category structure, and the problem of translation: The case of shame and vergüenza. Cognition and Emotion 2010 24 661 680

KitayamaS. Culture and basic psychological process – toward a system view of culture: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin 2002 128 89 96

KeltnerD.HarkerL. GilbertP.AndrewsB. The forms and functions of the nonverbal signal of shame. Shame: Interpersonal behavior psychopathology and culture 1998 New York, NY Oxford University Press 78 98

LebraT. S. Shame and Guilt: A psychocultural view of the Japanese self. Ethos 1993 1 192 209

LewisH. B. Shame and guilt in neurosis. 1971 New York, NY International Universities Press

LiJ.WangL.FischerK. W. The organization of Chinese shame concepts Cognition and Emotion 2004 18 767 797

Lindsay-HartzJ. Contrasting experiences of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist 1984 27 689 704

Lindsay-HartzJ.de RiveraJ.MascoloM. TangneyJ. P.FisherK. W. Differentiating shame and guilt and their effects on motivation. Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame guilt embarrassment and pride 1995 New York, NY Guilford 274 300

MarkusH. A.KitayamaS. KitayamaS.MarkusH. A. The cultural construction of the self and emotion: Implications for social behavior. Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence 1994 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 89 130

MesquitaB.FrijdaN. H. Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin 1992 112 179 204

MesquitaB.KarasawaM. Self-conscious emotions as dynamic cultural processes. Psychological Inquiry 2004 15 161 166

OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 2002 128 3 72

SchwartzS. H. KimU.TriandisH. C.KagitcibasiC.ChiS. C.YoonG. Beyond individualism and collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. Individualism and collectivism: Theory method and applications 1994 Newbury Park, CA Sage 85 122

SegallM. H.DasenP. R.BerryJ. W.PoortingaY. H. Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. 1999 Boston, MA Allyn and Bacon

ShaverK. The attribution of blame: Causality responsibility and blameworthiness 1985 New York, NY Springer

SingelisT. M.TriandisH. C.BhawukD. P. S.GelfandM. J. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research 1995 29 240 275

SmithR. S.WebsterJ. M.ParrottW. G.EyreH. L. The role of public exposure in moral and nonmoral shame and guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 83 138 159

StipekD. Differences between Americans and Chinese in the circumstances evoking pride, shame, and guilt. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1998 29 616 629

SpackmanM. P.ParrottW. G. Emotionology in prose a study of descriptions of emotion from three literary periods. Cognition and Emotion 2001 15 553 574

TakahashiK.OharaN.AntonucciT. C. Commonalities and differences in close relationships among the Americans and Japanese: A comparison by the individualism/collectivism concept. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2003 26 453 465

TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. Shame and guilt 2002 New York, NY Guilford

TangneyJ. P.WagnerP.GramzowR. The test of self-conscious affect. 1989 Fairfax, VA George Mason University

TangneyJ. P.MillerR. S.FlickerL.BarlowD. H. Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996 70 1256 1269

TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006 32 1339 1351

TriandisH. C. Culture and Social Behavior. 1994 New York, NY McGraw-Hill

TriandisH. C. Individualism and Collectivism. 1995 Boulder, CO Westview Press

TriandisH. C. Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality 2001 69 907 924

TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998 74 118 128

VandelloJ. A.CohenD. Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999 77 279 292

WongY.TsaiJ. TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W.TangneyJ. P. Cultural models of shame and guilt. The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research 2007 New York, NY Guilford 209 223

YamawakiN. Differences between Japanese and American college students in giving advice about help seeking to rape victims. Journal of Social Psychology 2007 147 511 530


  • View in gallery
    Means of the shame, responsibility, and emotional arousal as function of school and description. Abbreviations: ea, the Emotional Arousal Scale; shame, the Shame Intensity Scale; self, the Responsibility Rating for self; other, the Responsibility Rating for others. Numbers 1-3 after the name of the variables represent descriptions 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 40 40 36
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 5 5 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0