When Perceiving the Supernatural Changes the Natural: Religion and Agency Detection
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Christine Ma-Kellams in
Current site
Google Scholar
How does perceiving supernatural agents shape perceptions of natural agents? Despite the ongoing debate on whether supernatural attributions are functionless spillover from a hyperactive agency detector versus more evolved mechanisms that served key adaptive functions for ancestral humans, both accounts concede that one critical, defining quality of religion is that it superimposes intentional agency on natural events. Across two studies, the relationship between religious beliefs and perceptions of both agency and experience for a diverse array of agents were assessed – including ordinary individuals, supernatural beings, villains, martyrs, and celebrities. Across studies, naturalistically-occurring and experimentally-primed religious beliefs facilitated heightened perceptions of agency, but not experience, across both supernatural and natural agents. Thus, religious beliefs promote greater sensitivity to agency more generally. Implications for how this link reconciles the opposing notions of religion as an accidental by-product of agency detection vs. evolved adaptation are discussed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Atran S. & Norenzayan A. Religion’s evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004 27 713 770
-
Barrett J.L. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000 4 29 34
-
Bering J. & Shackelford T. Supernatural agents may have provided adaptive social information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004 24 732 734
-
Boyer P. Religion explained: the human instincts that fashion Gods, spirits, and ancestors. 2001 London William Heinemann
-
Epley N., Akalis S., Waytz A. & Cacioppo J.T. Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science 2008 19 114 120
-
Granqvist P., Mikulincer M. & Shaver P.R. Religion as attachment: normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 49 59
-
Gray K. & Wegner D.M. Blaming God for our pain: human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 7 16
-
Grysman A. & Hudson J. Agency detection in God concepts: essential, situational, and individual factors. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2012 12 129 146
-
Guthrie S.G. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion 1993 Oxford Oxford University Press
-
Hogg M.A., Adelman J.R. & Blagg R.D. Religion in the face of uncertainty: an uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 72 83
-
Kay A.C., Shepherd S., Blatz C.W., Chua S.N. & Galinsky A.D. For God (or) country: the hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010 99 725 739
-
Norenzayan A. & Shariff A.F. The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 2008 322 58 62
-
Povinelli D.J. & Preuss T.M. Theory of mind: evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends in Neuroscience 1995 18 418 424
-
Shariff A.F. & Norenzayan A. Mean Gods make good people: different views of God predict cheating behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2011 21 85 96
-
Vail K.E., Rothschild Z.K., Weise D.R., Solomon S., Pyszczynski T. & Greenberg J. A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 84 94
-
Ysseldyk R., Matheson K. & Anisman H. Religiosity as identity: toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 60 71
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1898 | 306 | 78 |
| Full Text Views | 333 | 9 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 231 | 27 | 12 |
When Perceiving the Supernatural Changes the Natural: Religion and Agency Detection
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Christine Ma-Kellams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
How does perceiving supernatural agents shape perceptions of natural agents? Despite the ongoing debate on whether supernatural attributions are functionless spillover from a hyperactive agency detector versus more evolved mechanisms that served key adaptive functions for ancestral humans, both accounts concede that one critical, defining quality of religion is that it superimposes intentional agency on natural events. Across two studies, the relationship between religious beliefs and perceptions of both agency and experience for a diverse array of agents were assessed – including ordinary individuals, supernatural beings, villains, martyrs, and celebrities. Across studies, naturalistically-occurring and experimentally-primed religious beliefs facilitated heightened perceptions of agency, but not experience, across both supernatural and natural agents. Thus, religious beliefs promote greater sensitivity to agency more generally. Implications for how this link reconciles the opposing notions of religion as an accidental by-product of agency detection vs. evolved adaptation are discussed.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1898 | 306 | 78 |
| Full Text Views | 333 | 9 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 231 | 27 | 12 |