Is reasoning about religious ritual tethered to ordinary, nonreligious human reasoning about actions? E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley’s ritual form hypothesis (rfh) constitutes a cognitive approach to religious ritual – an explanatory theory that suggests people use ordinary human cognition to make specific predictions about ritual properties, relatively independent of cultural or religious particulars. Few studies assess the credibility of rfh and further evidence is needed to generalize its predictions across cultures. Towards this end, we assessed culturally Chinese “special patient” rituals in Singapore. Our findings strongly support rfh predictions for special patient ritual repeatability, reversibility, sensory pageantry and emotionality.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ames R. Kasulis T. , Ames R. & Dissanayake W. On body as ritual practice Self as body in Asian theory and practice 1993 Albany, NY State University of New York Press 149 156
Barrett J.L. Light T. & Wilson B.C. Bringing data to mind: Empirical claims of Lawson and McCaulaey’s theory of religious ritual Religion as a Human Capacity: A Festschrift in Honor of E. Thomas Lawson 2004 Leiden Brill 265 288
Barrett J.L. & Lawson E.T. Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgments of ritual efficacy Journal of Cognition and Culture 2001 1 183 201
Henrich J. , Heine S. J. & Norenzayan A. The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010 Vol. 33 2–3 61 135
Jullien F. Goldhammer A. Vital Nourishment: Departing from Happiness 2007 New York, NY Zone Books
Lawson E.T. Religions of Africa: Traditions in Transformation 1984 New York, NY Harper Collins
Lawson E.T. & McCauley R.N. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Malley B. & Barrett J.L. “Does myth inform ritual? A test of the Lawson and McCauley hypotheses” Journal of Ritual Studies 2003 17 2 1 14
McCauley R.N. & Lawson E.T. Bringing Ritual to Mind 2001 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Nisbett R.E. , Kaiping P. , Choi I. & Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition Psychological Review 2001 108 291 310
Slingerland E. Body and mind in early China: an integrated humanities-science approach Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2013 81 1 50
Smith P.B. Bond M.H. On the distinctiveness of Chinese psychology; or, are we all Chinese? The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology 2010 New York, NY Oxford University Press 699 710
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 353 | 75 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 193 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 4 | 0 |
Is reasoning about religious ritual tethered to ordinary, nonreligious human reasoning about actions? E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley’s ritual form hypothesis (rfh) constitutes a cognitive approach to religious ritual – an explanatory theory that suggests people use ordinary human cognition to make specific predictions about ritual properties, relatively independent of cultural or religious particulars. Few studies assess the credibility of rfh and further evidence is needed to generalize its predictions across cultures. Towards this end, we assessed culturally Chinese “special patient” rituals in Singapore. Our findings strongly support rfh predictions for special patient ritual repeatability, reversibility, sensory pageantry and emotionality.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 353 | 75 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 193 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 4 | 0 |