Individual and Cross-Cultural Differences in Semantic Intuitions: New Experimental Findings
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by James R. Beebe in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ryan Undercoffer in
Current site
Google Scholar
In 2004 Edouard Machery, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich published what has become one of the most widely discussed papers in experimental philosophy, in which they reported that East Asian and Western participants had different intuitions about the semantic reference of proper names. A flurry of criticisms of their work has emerged, and although various replications have been performed, many critics remain unconvinced. We review the current debate over Machery et al.’s (2004) results and take note of which objections to their work have been satisfactorily answered and which ones still need to be addressed. We then report the results of studies that reveal significant cross-cultural and intra-cultural differences in semantic intuitions when we control for variables that critics allege have had a potentially distorting effect on Machery et al.’s findings. These variables include the epistemic perspective from which participants are supposed to understand the research materials, unintended anchoring effects of those materials, and pragmatic factors involved in the interpretation of speech acts within them. Our results confirm the robustness of the cross-cultural differences observed by Machery et al. and thereby strengthen the philosophical challenge they pose.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Deutsch M. Experimental philosophy and the theory of reference Mind and Language 2009 24 445 466
-
Devitt M. Experimental semantics Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2011 82 418 435
-
Genone J. & Lombrozo T. Concept possession, experimental semantics, and hybrid theories of reference Philosophical Psychology 2012 25 717 742
-
Gosling S.D. , Rentfrow P.J. & Swann W.B. Jr. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains Journal of Research in Personality 2003 37 504 528
-
Ichikawa J. , Maitra I. & Weatherson B. In defense of a Kripkean dogma Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2012 85 56 68
-
Jackman H. Semantic intuitions, conceptual analysis, and cross-cultural variation Philosophical Studies 2009 146 159 177
-
Komarraju M. , Karau S.J. & Schmeck R.R. Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement Learning and Individual Differences 2009 19 47 52
-
Komarraju M. , Karau S.J. , Schmeck R.R. & Avdic A. The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement Personality and Individual Differences 2011 51 472 477
-
Kripke S. Naming and Necessity 1972/1980 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
-
Lam B. Are Cantonese-speakers really descriptivists? Revisiting cross-cultural semantics Cognition 2010 115 320 329
-
Ludwig K. The epistemology of thought experiments: first person versus third person approaches Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2007 31 128 159
-
Machery E. Hales S.D. Variation in intuitions about reference and ontological disagreements A Companion to Relativism 2011 New York, NY Blackwell 118 136
-
Machery E. Expertise and intuitions about reference Theoria 2012 27 37 54
-
Machery E. & Stich S. Russell G. & Fara D.G. Experimental philosophy of language Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language 2012 New York, NY Routledge 495 512
-
Machery E. , Mallon R. , Nichols S. & Stich S. Semantics, cross-cultural style Cognition 2004 92 B1 B12
-
Machery E. , Olivola C.Y. & de Blanc, M. Linguistic and metalinguistic intuitions in the philosophy of language Analysis 2009 69 689 694
-
Machery E. , Deutsch M. , Mallon R. , Nichols S. , Sytsma J. & Stich S. Semantic intuitions: Reply to Lam Cognition 2010 117 361 366
-
Machery E. , Mallon R. , Nichols S. & Stich S. If folk intuitions vary, then what? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2013 86 618 683
-
Machery E. , Deutsch M. & Sytsma J. Bianchi A. Speaker’s reference and cross-cultural semantics On Reference forthcoming Oxford Oxford University Press
-
Mallon R. , Machery E. , Nichols S. & Stich S. Against arguments from reference Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2009 79 332 356
-
Martí G. Against semantic multi-culturalism Analysis 2009 69 42 48
-
Martí G. Kabasenche W.P. , O’Rourke M. & Slater M.H. Empirical data and the theory of reference Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, volume 10: Reference and Referring forthcoming Cambridge, MA MIT Press
-
McCrae R.R. & Costa P.T. Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal American Psychologist 1997 52 509 516
-
McCrae R.R. , Costa P.T. Jr. & Yik M.S.M. Bond M.H. Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure The Handbook of Chinese Psychology 1996 Hong Kong Oxford University Press 189 207
-
McCrae R.R. & Terracciano A. Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005 88 547 561 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project
-
Nettle D. Personality: What Makes You The Way You Are 2007 New York, NY Oxford University Press
-
Rolland J.-P. McCrae R.R. & Allik J. The cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures 2002 New York, NY Kluwer Academic/Plenum 7 28
-
Sytsma J. & Livengood J. A new perspective concerning experiments on semantic intuitions Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2011 89 315 332
-
Tversky A. & Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases Science 1974 185 1124 1130
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 801 | 241 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 273 | 9 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 70 | 17 | 6 |
Individual and Cross-Cultural Differences in Semantic Intuitions: New Experimental Findings
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by James R. Beebe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ryan Undercoffer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In 2004 Edouard Machery, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich published what has become one of the most widely discussed papers in experimental philosophy, in which they reported that East Asian and Western participants had different intuitions about the semantic reference of proper names. A flurry of criticisms of their work has emerged, and although various replications have been performed, many critics remain unconvinced. We review the current debate over Machery et al.’s (2004) results and take note of which objections to their work have been satisfactorily answered and which ones still need to be addressed. We then report the results of studies that reveal significant cross-cultural and intra-cultural differences in semantic intuitions when we control for variables that critics allege have had a potentially distorting effect on Machery et al.’s findings. These variables include the epistemic perspective from which participants are supposed to understand the research materials, unintended anchoring effects of those materials, and pragmatic factors involved in the interpretation of speech acts within them. Our results confirm the robustness of the cross-cultural differences observed by Machery et al. and thereby strengthen the philosophical challenge they pose.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 801 | 241 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 273 | 9 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 70 | 17 | 6 |