The Internet and social media have opened niches for political exploitation of human dispositions to hyper-alarmed states that amplify perceived threats relative to their objective probabilities of occurrence. Researchers should aim to observe the dynamic “ramping up” of security threat mechanisms under controlled experimental conditions. Such research necessarily begins from a clear model of standard baseline states, and should involve adding treatments to established experimental protocols developed by experimental economists. We review these protocols, which allow for joint estimation of risk preferences and subjective beliefs about probabilities and their distributions. Results we have obtained on such estimates, from populations in various countries, are gathered for comparison. Most people show moderate risk aversion in non-alarmed states. We also find universal heterogeneity in risk preference structures, with substantial sub-samples weighting probabilities in such a way as to display “probability pessimism” (rank dependent utility), while others make risky choices in accordance with expected utility theory.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ainslie G. Picoeconomics 1992 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Andersen S. , Fountain J. , Harrison G.W. & Rutström E.E. Estimating subjective probabilities Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2014 48 207 229
Andersen S. , Harrison G.W. , Lau M.I. & Rutström E.E. Lost in state space: are preferences stable? International Economic Review 2008 49 1091 1112
Andersen S. , Harrison G.W. , Lau M.I. & Rutström E.E. Behavioral econometrics for psychologists Journal of Economic Psychology 2010 31 553 576
Andersen S. , Harrison G.W. , Lau M.I. & Rutström E.E. Multiattribute utility theory, intertemporal utility and correlation aversion Working Paper 2011-04 2011 Atlanta, GA Center for Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Andersen S. , Harrison G.W. , Lau M.I. & Rutström E.E. Dual criteria decisions Journal of Economic Psychology 2014 41 101 113
Ariely D. Predictably Irrational 2008 New York, NY Harper Collins
Ballinger T.P. & Wilcox N. Decisions, error and heterogeneity Economic Journal 1997 107 1090 1105
Becker G.M. , DeGroot M.H. & Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method Behavioral Science 1964 9 226 232
Binmore K. Rational Decisions 2009 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Clark A. Microcognition 1989 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Clark A. Being There 1997 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
de Finetti B. Kyburg H.E. Jr. & Smokler H.E. La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincairé 7, 1–68. (English translation as Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources Studies in Subjective Probability 1937/1980 second Huntington, NY Robert E. Krieger 53 118
de Finetti B. Logical foundations and measurement of subjective probability Acta Psychologica 1970 34 129 145
Deaton A. Instruments, randomization and learning about development Journal of Economic Literature 2010 48 424 455
Dennett D. The Intentional Stance 1987 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Ebert S. & Wlesen D. Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence and temperance Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2014 48 231 252
Eeckhoudt L. & Schlesinger H. Putting risk in its place American Economic Review 2006 96 280 289
Epstein R.A. The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic 1977 San Diego, CA Academic Press
Gollier C. The Economics of Risk and Time 2001 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Grether D.M. & Plott C.R. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon American Economic Review 1979 69 623 648
Gul F. A theory of disappointment aversion Econometrica 1991 59 667 686
Harrison G.W. & Lau M.I. Risk attitudes, sample selection and attrition in a longitudinal field experiment Working Paper 2014-04 2014 Atlanta, GA Center for the Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Harrison G.W. & Ng J.M. Evaluating the expected welfare gain from insurance Journal of Risk and Insurance 2016 83 91 120
Harrison G.W. & Phillips R.D. Andersen T.J. Subjective beliefs and the statistical forecasts of financial risks: the Chief Risk Officer Project Contemporary Challenges in Risk Management 2014 New York, NY Palgrave Macmillan
Harrison G.W. & Ross D. Varieties of paternalism and the heterogeneity of utility structures Working Paper 2016-06 2016 Atlanta, GA Center for Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Harrison G.W. & Rutström E.E. Cox J.C. & Harrison G.W. Risk aversion in the laboratory Risk Aversion in Experiments, Research in Experimental Economics Volume 12 2008 Bingley Emerald 41 197
Harrison G.W. & Rutström E.E. Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral Experimental Economics, 2009 12 133 158
Harrison G.W. & Swarthout J.T. Experimental payment protocols and the bipolar behaviorist Theory and Decision 2014 77 423 438
Harrison G.W. & Swarthout J.T. Cumulative prospect theory in the laboratory: a reconsideration Working Paper 2016-05 2016 Atlanta, GA Center for Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Harrison G.W. & Ulm E.R. Recovering subjective probability distributions Working Paper 2015-01 2015 Atlanta, GA Center for the Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Harrison G.W. & Ulm E.R. Recovering subjective probability distributions Working Paper 2016-01 2016 Atlanta, GA Center for Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Harrison G.W. , Lau M.I. & Rutström E.E. Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: a field experiment Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2007 109 341 368
Harrison G.W. , Lau M.I. & Rutström E.E. Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment and self-selection into experiments Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2009 70 498 507
Harrison G.W. , Humphrey S.J. & Verschoor A. Choice under uncertainty: evidence from Ethiopia, India and Uganda Economic Journal 2010 120 80 104
Harrison G.W. , Martínez-Correa J. , Swarthout J.T. & Ulm E.R. Scoring rules for subjective probability distributions Working Paper 2012-10 2012 Atlanta, GA Center for the Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Harrison G.W. , Martínez-Correa J. & Swarthout J.T. Eliciting subjective probabilities with binary lotteries Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2014 101 128 140
Harrison G.W. , Martínez-Correa J. , Swarthout J.T. & Ulm E.R. Eliciting subjective probability distributions with binary lotteries Economics Letters 2015 127 68 71
Harrison G.W. , Martínez-Correa J. , Ng J.M. & Swarthout J.T. Evaluating the welfare of index insurance Working Paper 2016-07 2016 Atalanta, GA Center for Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University
Heckman J.J. Manski C. & Garfinkel I. Randomization and social program evaluation Evaluating Welfare and Training Programs 1992 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
Hey J.D. & Orme C. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data Econometrica 1994 62 1291 1326
Holt C.A. & Smith A.M. An update on Bayesian updating Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2009 69 125 134
Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild 1995 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Kadane J.B. & Winkler R.L. Separating probability elicitation from utilities Journal of the American Statistical Association 1988 83 357 363
Kagel J. , Battalio R. & Green L. Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Kahneman D. & Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 1979 47 263 292
Karni E. A mechanism for eliciting probabilities Econometrica 2009 77 603 606
Keane M.P. Structural vs atheoretic approaches to econometrics Journal of Econometrics 2010a 156 3 20
Keane M.P. A Structuralist perspective on the experimentalist school Journal of Economic Perspectives 2010b 24 47 58
Köszegi B. & Rabin M. Caplin A. & Schotter A. Revealed mistakes and revealed preferences The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook 2008 New York, NY Oxford University Press 193 209
Leamer E.E. Tantalus on the road to Asymptopia Journal of Economic Perspectives 2010 24 31 46
Lopes L.L. Risk and distributional inequality Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984 10 465 484
Matheson J.E. & Winkler R.L. Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions Management Science 1976 22 1087 1096
McKelvey R.D. & Page T. Public and private information: an experimental study of information pooling Econometrica 1990 58 1321 1339
Offerman T. , Sonnemans J. , van de Kuilen G. & Wakker P.P. A truth-serum for non-Bayesians: correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes Review of Economic Studies 2009 76 1461 1489
Prelec D. The probability weighting function Econometrica 1998 66 95 113
Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1982 3 323 343
Rubinstein A. Similarity and decision making under risk (Is there a utility? Theory resolution of the Allais Pradox?) Journal of Economic Theory 1988 46 145 153
Savage L.J. The Foundations of Statistics 1954 New York, NY Wiley
Savage L.J. Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations Journal of American Statistical Association 1971 66 783 801
Savage L.J. The Foundations of Statistics 1972 second New York, NY Dover
Schmidt U. & Zank H. Risk aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory Management Science 2008 54 208 216
Stigler G.J. & Becker G.S. De gustibus non est disputandum American Economic Review 1977 67 76 90
Tversky A. & Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: cumulative representations of uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992 5 297 323
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General 2004 Washington, DC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health
von Neumann J. & Mogenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1944 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Wilcox N. Lottery choice: incentives, complexity and decision time Economic Journal 1983 103 1397 1417
Wilcox N. Unusual estimates of probability weighting functions Working Paper 2015 Orange County, CA Economic Science Institute, Chapman University
Winkler R.L. & Murphy A.H. Nonlinear utility and the probability score Journal of Applied Meteorology 1970 9 143 148
Woody E. & Szechtman H. Unintended consequences of security motivation in the age of the Internet: impacts on governance and democracy Journal of Cognition and Culture 2016 16 365 382
Yaari M. The dual theory of choice under risk Econometrica 1987 55 95 115
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 344 | 54 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 216 | 5 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 44 | 11 | 4 |
The Internet and social media have opened niches for political exploitation of human dispositions to hyper-alarmed states that amplify perceived threats relative to their objective probabilities of occurrence. Researchers should aim to observe the dynamic “ramping up” of security threat mechanisms under controlled experimental conditions. Such research necessarily begins from a clear model of standard baseline states, and should involve adding treatments to established experimental protocols developed by experimental economists. We review these protocols, which allow for joint estimation of risk preferences and subjective beliefs about probabilities and their distributions. Results we have obtained on such estimates, from populations in various countries, are gathered for comparison. Most people show moderate risk aversion in non-alarmed states. We also find universal heterogeneity in risk preference structures, with substantial sub-samples weighting probabilities in such a way as to display “probability pessimism” (rank dependent utility), while others make risky choices in accordance with expected utility theory.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 344 | 54 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 216 | 5 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 44 | 11 | 4 |