The Mnemonic of Intuitive Ontology Violation is not the Distinctiveness Effect: Evidence from a Broad Age Spectrum of Persons in the uk and China during a Free-Recall Task

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
View More View Less
  • 1 School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Thrive Center for Human Development, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK
  • 2 Thrive Center for Human Development, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, 180 N. Oakland Avenue, Pasadena, ca 91101, USA
  • 3 *Corresponding author, e-mail: justin.gregory@anthro.ox.ac.uk

Login via Institution

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

The typical formulation of Pascal Boyer’s counterintuitiveness theory asserts that concepts violating intuitive ontological-category structures are more memorable. However, Boyer’s () original claim centred on the transmission advantages of counter-ontological representations that were cultural. Nevertheless, subsequent studies focused on the recall of novel counterintuitive representations, and an “alternative account” of the memorability of counterintuitive concepts has emerged resembling the distinctiveness effect. Yet, experimental evidence shows that familiar concepts have memorability advantages over novel ones. This investigation of these pan-cultural transmission biases used a large age-representative sample (13–86 years; N = 365) in the uk and China. Results were analysed by hlm, with familiarity, counterintuitiveness, and delay as 2-level fixed factors, and age as a covariate. No support was revealed for the typical formulation of the hypothesis — however, a significant age effect and interaction of familiarity × counterintuitiveness were found.

  • Anaki D. & Bentin S. Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects Cognition 2009 111 144 149

  • Baddeley A., Eysenck M.W. & Anderson M.C. Memory 2009 New York, NY Psychology Press

  • Banerjee K., Haque O.S. & Spelke E.S. Melting lizards and crying mailboxes: Children’s preferential recall of minimally counterintuitive concepts Cognitive Science 2013 37 1 39

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrett J.L. Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness: Theoretical and methodological reflections Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 2008 20 308 338

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrett J.L. & Nyhof M.A. Spreading non-natural Concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials Journal of Cognition and Culture 2001 1 69 100

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bloch M. Essays on cultural transmission 2005 New York, NY Berg

  • Boyer P. The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion 1994 Berkeley, CA University of California Press

  • Boyer P. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought 2001 New York, NY Basic Books

  • Boyer P. & Ramble C. Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations Cognitive Science 2001 25 535 564

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brimer R.W. & Mueller J.H. Immediate and final recall of pictures and words with written or oral tests American Journal of Psychology 1979 93 437 447

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gonce L.O., Upal M.A., Slone D.J. & Tweney R.D. Role of context in memory recall of counterintuitive concepts Journal of Cognition and Culture 2006 6 521 547

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Green D.M. & Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966 New York, NY Wiley

  • Gregory J. P. & Barrett J.L. Epistemology and counterintuitiveness: Role and relationship in epidemiology of cultural representations Journal of Cognition and Culture 2009 9 289 314

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory J.P. & Greenway T.S. Is there a window of opportunity for religiosity? Children and adolescents preferentially recall religious-type cultural representations, but older adults do not Religion, Brain & Behavior in press doi:10.1080/2153599X.2016.1196234

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall J.F. Learning as a function of word frequency American Journal of Psychology 1954 67 138 140

  • Hildyard A. & Olson D.R. Tannen D. On the comprehension and memory of oral vs. written discourse Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy 1982 Norwood, NJ Ablex 19 33

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirshman E., Whelley M.N. & Palij M. An investigation of paradoxical memory effects Journal of Memory and Language 1989 28 594 609

  • Hunt R. The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did Psychonomic Bulleting and Review 1995 2 105 112

  • Ingram K.M., Mickes L. & Wixted J.T. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011 38 325 339

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson C.V.M., Kelly S.W. & Bishop P. Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts Journal of Cognition and Culture 2010 10 111 123

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keil F. C. Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective 1979 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press

  • Legare C.H., Zhu L. & Wellman H.M. Examining biological explanations in Chinese preschool children: A cross-cultural comparison Journal of Cognition and Culture 2013 13 67 93

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nairne J.S., Van Arrsdall J.E., Panderiada J.N.S., Cogdill M. & LeBreton J.M. Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy Psychological Science 2013 24 2099 2105

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nisbett R.E. The geography of thought 2003 New York, NY Free Press

  • Nisbett R.E., Peng K., Choi C. & Norenzayan A. Culture and thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition Psychological Review 2001 108 291 310

  • Norenzayan A., Atran S., Faulkner J. & Schaller M. Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives Cognitive Science 2006 30 531 553

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt S.R. Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory of conceptually distinctive events Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1985 11 565 578

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spelke E.S. Carey S. & Gelman R. Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory Epigenesis of mind: Studies in biology and cognition 1991 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 133 170

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sperber D. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach 1996 Oxford Blackwell

  • Sumby W.H. Word frequency and serial position effects Journal of Oral Learning and Oral Behavior 1963 1 443 450

  • Surprenant A.M. & Neath I. Principles of memory 2009 New York, NY Psychology Press

  • Upal M.A. An alternative account of the minimal counterintuitiveness effect Cognitive Systems Research 2010 11 194 203

  • Waddill P.J. & McDaniel M.A. Distinctiveness effects in recall: Differential processing or privileged retrieval? Memory and Cognition 1998 26 108 120

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang Q. The emergence of cultural self-construct: Autobiographical memory and self-description in American and Chinese children Developmental Psychology 2004 40 3 15

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wellman H.M., Cross D. & Watson J. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief Child Development 2001 72 655 684

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 157 90 3
Full Text Views 144 1 0
PDF Downloads 16 1 0