Are Atheists Implicit Theists?

in Journal of Cognition and Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The Cognitive Science of Religion commonly advances the view that religious beliefs emerge naturally via specific cognitive biases without cultural influence. From this perspective comes the claim that self-proclaimed atheists harbour traces of supernatural thinking. By exploring the potential influence of the cultural learning mechanism Credibility Enhancing Displays (creds), which affirms beliefs, current disparities between studies involved in priming the implicit theism of atheists, might be reconciled. Eighty-eight university students were randomly assigned to either a religious or control prime condition. A dictator game was completed to obtain an indication of pro-social behaviour (psb). Lifetime theists reported significantly higher religious creds exposure levels than lifetime atheists, though not convert atheists. Conversely, lifetime atheists reported significantly lower creds exposure scores than convert atheists. Convert atheists in the prime condition were significantly more pro-social than lifetime atheists. Additionally, higher scores on the creds exposure measure equated to higher psb in the religious condition than the control condition. The results are consistent with the view that supernatural belief formation is an interactive process between both context and content biases, and that in order to accurately test for implicit theism, past personal differences in exposure to religious creds should be considered.

Are Atheists Implicit Theists?

in Journal of Cognition and Culture

Sections

References

AhmedA.M.SalasO. In the back of your mind: Subliminal influences of religious concepts on prosocial behavior Working Papers in Economics 2008 331 1 25

AhmedA.M.SalasO. Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions Journal of Socio-Economics 2011 40 242 246

AtranS.HenrichJ. The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions Biological Theory: Integrating Development Evolution and Cognition 2010 1 18 30

AtranS.NorenzayanA. Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, and communion Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004 27 713 730

AtranS.SperberD. LandsmannL.T. Learning without teaching: Its place in culture Culture schooling and psychological development 1991 NJ Ablex, Norwood 39 55

BanerjeeK.BloomP. Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012 17 7 8

BarghJ.A.ChartrandT.L. The unbearable automaticity of being American Psychologist 1999 54 462 479

BarghJ.A.ChartrandT.L. ReisH.T.JuddC.M. The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2000 New York, NY Cambridge University Press 253 284

BarrettJ.L. Exploring the natural foundations of religion Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000 4 29 34

BarrettJ.L. Why would anyone believe in God? 2004 Walnut Creek, CA Alta Mira Press

BarrettJ.L. The relative unnaturalness of atheism: On why Geertz and Markusson are both right and wrong Religion 2010 40 169 172

BarrettJ.L.LanmanJ.A. The science of religious beliefs Religion 2008 38 109 124

BeringJ.M. The existential theory of mind Review of General Psychology 2002 6 3 24

BeringJ.M. The folk psychology of souls Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006 29 453 498

BeringJ.M. Atheism is only skin deep: Geertz and Markusson rely mistakenly on sociodemographic data as meaningful indicators of underlying cognition Religion 2010 40 166 168

BloomP. Religion is natural Developmental Science 2007 10 147 151

BoyerP. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought 2001 New York, NY Basic Books

BoyerP.WalkerS. RosengrenK.S.JohnsonC.N.HarrisP.L. Intuitive ontology and cultural input in the acquisition of religious concepts Imagining the impossible: Magical scientific and religious thinking in children 2000 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 130 156

DijksterhuisA.PrestonJ.WegnerD. M.AartsH. Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008 44 2 9

FieldA. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2009 3rd. edn London Sage

GeertzA.MarkussonG. Religion is natural, atheism is not: On why everybody is both right and wrong Religion 2010 40 152 165

GervaisW.M. Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013 8 380 394

GervaisW.M. SaroglouV. Religious cognition Religion Personality and Social Behaviour 2014 Hove Psychology Press

GervaisW.M.HenrichJ. The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in Gods Journal of Cognition and Culture 2010 10 383 389

GervaisW.M.NorenzayanA. Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012 48 298 302

GervaisW.M.WillardA.NorenzayanA.HenrichJ. The cultural transmission of faith: Why natural intuitions and memory biases are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief Religion 2011 41 389 411

GillA.LundsgaardeE. State welfare spending and religiosity Rationality and Society 2004 16 399 436

GuthrieS. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion 1993 Oxford Oxford University Press

HaleyK.J.FesslerD.M. Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game Evolution and Human Behaviour 2005 26 245 256

HarrisP.L.PasquiniE.S.DukeS.AsscherJ.J.PonsF. Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontology Developmental Science 2006 9 76 96

HenrichJ. The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution Evolution and Human Behaviour 2009 30 244 260

HoffmanE.McCabeK.ShachatK.SmithV. Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games Games and Economic Behavior 1994 7 346 380

JongJ.HalberstadtJ.BluemkeM. Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012 48 983 989

LanmanJ.A. The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization Journal of Contemporary Religion 2012 27 49 65

LanmanJ. BullivantS.RuseM. Atheism and cognitive science The Oxford Handbook of Atheism 2013 Oxford Oxford University Press 468 482

LaurinK.KayA.C.FitzsimonsG.M. Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2012 102 4 12

McCauleyR.N. KeilF.C.WilsonR.A. The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness of science Explanation and cognition 2000 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 61 86

McKayR.EffersonC.WhitehouseH.FehrE. Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2011 278 1858 1863

NorenzayanA.GervaisW.M. The origins of religious disbelief Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013 17 20 25

NorenzayanA.HansenI. Beliefs in supernatural agents in the face of death Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006 32 174 187

NorenzayanA.ShariffA.F.GervaisW.M. The evolution of religious misbelief Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2009 32 531 532

NorenzayanA.HenrichJ.SlingerlandE. RichersonP.ChristiansenM. Religious prosociality: A synthesis Cultural Evolution in press Cambridge, MA MIT Press 365 379

OrtmannA.TichyL. Understanding gender effects in the laboratory: Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1999 39 327 339

PichonI.BoccatoG.SaroglouV. Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study European Journal of Social Psychology 2007 37 1032 1045

PrestonJ.EpleyN. Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009 45 238 241

RandD.G.DreberA.HaqueO.S.KaneR.J.NowakM.A.CoakleyS. Religious motivations for cooperation: an experimental investigation using explicit primes Religion Brain and Behavior 2014 4 31 48

Randolph-SengB.NielsenM.E. Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2007 17 303 315

Randolph-SengB.NielsenM.E. Is God really watching you? A response to Shariff and Norenzayan International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2007 18 119 122 (2008)

SalerB.ZieglerC.A. Atheism and the apotheosis of agency Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 2006 42 7 41

ShariffA.F.NorenzayanA. God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game Psychological Science 2007 18 803 809

ShenhavA.RandD.G.GreeneJ.D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012 141 423 428

Van CappellenP.CorneilleO.ColsS.SaroglouV. Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2011 21 97 105

WhithouseH. BulbuliaJ.SosisR.HarrisE.GenetR.GenetC.WymanK. Cognitive evolution and religion; cognition and religious evolution The evolution of religion 2008 Santa Margarita, CA Collins Foundation Press 31 40

XygalatasD. Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: A case study from Mauritius Religion Brain and Behavior 2013 3 91 102

ZuckermanP. MartinM. Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns The Cambridge Companion to Atheism 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 47 65

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Total cred means for each religious group. Error bars represent +1 se.
  • View in gallery
    Estimated marginal means for priming by religious groups. Error bars represent +1 se.
  • View in gallery
    Estimated marginal means for priming condition by atheist sub-groups. Error bars represent +1 se.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 35 11
Full Text Views 95 95 82
PDF Downloads 6 6 4
EPUB Downloads 2 2 2