The Mnemonic of Intuitive Ontology Violation is Not the Distinctiveness Effect: Evidence From a Broad Age Spectrum of Persons in the uk and China During a Free-Recall Task

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
View More View Less
  • 1 School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Thrive Center for Human Development, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology
  • 2 Thrive Center for Human Development, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology

Login via Institution

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

The typical formulation of Pascal Boyer’s counterintuitiveness theory asserts that concepts violating intuitive ontological-category structures are more memorable. However, Boyer’s (2001) original claim centered on the transmission advantages of counter-ontological representations that were cultural. Nevertheless, subsequent studies focused on the recall of novel counterintuitive representations, and an “alternative account” of the memorability of counterintuitive concepts has emerged resembling the distinctiveness effect (Upal, 2010). Yet, experimental evidence shows that familiar concepts have memorability advantages over novel ones (Anaki & Bentin, 2009; Ingram, Mickes, & Wixted, 2011). This investigation of these pan-cultural transmission biases used a large age-representative sample (13–86 years; N = 365) in the uk and China. Results were analyzed by hlm, with familiarity, counterintuitiveness, and delay as 2-level fixed factors, and age as a covariate. No support was revealed for the typical formulation of the hypothesis — however, a significant age effect and interaction of familiarity x counterintuitiveness were found.

  • Anaki, D., & Bentin, S. (2009) Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects. Cognition, 111, 144149.

  • Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Banerjee, K., Haque, O. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). Melting lizards and crying mailboxes: Children’s preferential recall of minimally counterintuitive concepts. Cognitive Science, 37, 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrett, J. L. (2008). Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 20, 308338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural Concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 1, 69100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bloch, M. (2005). Essays on cultural transmission. New York: Berg.

  • Boyer, P. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

  • Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535564.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brimer, R. W., & Mueller, J. H. (1979). Immediate and final recall of pictures and words with written or oral tests. The American Journal of Psychology, 93, 437447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gonce, L. O., Upal, M. A., Slone, D. J., & Tweney, R. D. (2006). Role of context in memory recall of counterintuitive concepts. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 6, 521547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.

  • Gregory, J. P., & Greenway, T.S. (2017). Is there a window of opportunity for religiosity? Children and adolescents preferentially recall religious-type cultural representations, but older adults do not. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(2), 98116. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2016.1196234

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J. P., & Barrett, J. L. (2009). Epistemology and counterintuitiveness: Role and relationship in epidemiology of cultural representations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 289314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, J. F. (1954). Learning as a function of word frequency. The American Journal of Psychology, 67, 138140.

  • Hildyard, A., & Olson, D. R. (1982). On the comprehension and memory of oral vs. written discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 1933). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirshman, E., Whelley, M. N., & Palij, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 594609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunt, R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulleting and Review, 2, 105112.

  • Ingram, K. M., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2011). Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 325339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, C. V. M., Kelly, S. W., & Bishop, P. (2010) Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 111123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keil, F. C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Legare, C. H., Zhu, L., & Wellman, H. M. (2013). Examining biological explanations in Chinese preschool children: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13, 6793.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nairne, J. S., VanArrsdall, J. E., Panderiada,J. N. S. Cogdill, M., & LeBreton J. M. (2013). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy. Psychological Science, 24, 20992105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. New York: Free Press.

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, C., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norenzayan. A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30, 531553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, S. R. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory of conceptually distinctive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 565578.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spelke, E. S. (1991). Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), Epigenesis of mind: Studies in biology and cognition (pp. 133170. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Sumby, W. H. (1963). Word frequency and serial position effects. Journal of Oral Learning and Oral Behavior, 1, 443450.

  • Surprenant, A. M., & Neath, I. (2009). Principles of memory. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Upal, M. A. (2010). An alternative account of the minimal counterintuitiveness effect. Cognitive Systems Research, 11, 194203.

  • Waddill, P. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (1998). Distinctiveness effects in recall: Differential processing or privileged retrieval? Memory and Cognition, 26, 108120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • > Wang, Q. (2004). The emergence of cultural self-construct: Autobiographical memory and self-description in American and Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 40, 315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 109 55 0
Full Text Views 178 4 0
PDF Downloads 10 2 0