The Needs of the Many Do Not Outweigh the Needs of the Few: The Limits of Individual Sacrifice across Diverse Cultures

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
View More View Less
  • 1 Institut Jean-Nicod CNRS UMR 8129, Institut d’Etude de la Cognition Ecole Normale Supérieure — PSL Research UniversityFrance
  • | 2 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives — INSERM U960, Institut d’Etude de la Cognition Ecole Normale Supérieure — PSL Research UniversityFrance
  • | 3 Nara Teachers college of Early childhood EducationNaraJapan
  • | 4 Department of General Psychology, Vilnius UniversityLithuania
  • | 5 Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, Universidad de Costa RicaCosta Rica
  • | 6 Reasearch institute for child psychology and pathopsychologyBratislavaSlovakia
  • | 7 Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State UniversityUSA
  • | 8 School of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State UniversityUSA
  • | 9 Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS) & Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • | 10 Laboratoire d’Ethnologie et de Sociologie Comparative Université Paris Ouest Nanterre — Nanterre UniversityFranceCNRS (UMR 7186)
  • | 11 Centre Asie du Sud-EstParisFranceEHESS/CNRS, UMR 8170
  • | 12 Corresponding Author, Yale
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



A long tradition of research in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) countries has investigated how people weigh individual welfare versus group welfare in their moral judgments. Relatively less research has investigated the generalizability of results across non-WEIRD populations. In the current study, we ask participants across nine diverse cultures (Bali, Costa Rica, France, Guatemala, Japan, Madagascar, Mongolia, Serbia, and the USA) to make a series of moral judgments regarding both third-party sacrifice for group welfare and first-person sacrifice for group welfare. In addition to finding some amount of cross-cultural variation on most of our questions, we also find two cross-culturally consistent judgments: (1) when individuals are in equivalent situations, overall welfare should be maximized, and (2) harm to individuals should be taken into account, and some types of individual harm can trump overall group welfare. We end by discussing the specific pattern of variable and consistent features in the context of evolutionary theories of the evolution of morality.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 548 117 13
Full Text Views 236 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 40 10 0