Performing Orders: Speech Acts, Facial Expressions and Gender Bias

in Journal of Cognition and Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The business of a sentence is not only to describe some state of affairs but also to perform other kinds of speech acts like ordering, suggesting, asking, etc. Understanding the kind of action performed by a speaker who utters a sentence is a multimodal process which involves the computing of verbal and non-verbal information. This work aims at investigating if the understanding of a speech act is affected by the gender of the actor that produces the utterance in combination with a certain facial expression. Experimental data collected show that, as compared to men, women are less likely to be perceived as performers of orders and are more likely to be perceived as performers of questions. This result reveals a gender bias which reflects a process of women’s subordination according to which women are hardly considered as holding the hierarchical social position required for the correct execution of an order

Performing Orders: Speech Acts, Facial Expressions and Gender Bias

in Journal of Cognition and Culture

Sections

References

  • AllwoodJ.CerratoL.JokinenK.NavarrettaC. & PaggioP. (2005). The MUMIN annotation scheme for feedback, turn management and sequencing. In Gothenburg papers in Theoretical Linguistics 92: Proceedings from The Second Nordic Conference on Multimodal Communication pp. 91109. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.

  • AustinJ. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.M.WalkerS.C. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 148.

  • BianchiC. (2008). “Indexicals, Speech Acts and pornography”Analysis68(4) 310316.

  • CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS.T. & GlickP. (2007). The BIAS Map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology92631648.

  • DomaneschiF.PassarelliM. & ChiorriC. (2017). Facial expressions and speech acts: Experimental evidences on the role of the upper face as an illocutionary force indicating device in language comprehension. Cognitive Processing. Advance online publication.

  • EaglyA.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • EaglyA.H. & SteffenV.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46735754.

  • EaglyA.H. & WoodW. (1999). The origins of human sex differences: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist54408423.

  • EaglyA.H.WoodW. & DiekmanA. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H.M. Trautner (Eds.) The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123174). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

  • EckertP. & McConnell-GinetS. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • EkmanP. & FriesenW.V. (1978). Manual for the Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • EspositoA.EspositoA.M.MartoneR.MüllerV.ScarpettaG. (Eds.) (2010). Towards Autonomous Adaptive and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces: Theoretical and Practical Issues. New York, NY & London, UK: Springer.

  • FiskeS. (1993). Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist48621628.

  • HessU.AdamsR.B.Jr. & KleckR.E. (2004). Facial appearance, gender, and emotion expression. Emotion4378388.

  • Hornsby J. (1993) “Speech Acts and Pornography” Women’s Philosophy Review 10 pp. 3845.

  • Hornsby J. e Langton R. (1998) “Free Speech and Illocution” Legal Theory4 pp. 2137.

  • LakoffR. (1975). Language and women’s place. New York: Harper and Row.

  • LangtonR. (2009). Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • McGurkH. & MacDonaldJ. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature5588(264) 746748. doi:10.1038/264746a0.

  • OertelC.WlodarczakM.EdlundJ.WagnerP. & GustafsonJ. (2012). Gaze Patterns in Turn-Taking. In Proc. of Interspeech 2012. Portland, OR.

  • PelachaudC.CarofiglioV.De CarolisB.de RosisF. & PoggiI. (2002, July). Embodied contextual agent in information delivering application. In Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: Part 2 (pp. 758765). New York, NY: ACM.

  • PelachaudC.PrevostS. (1994). Sight and sound: Generating facial expressions and spoken intonation from context. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Speech Synthesis (216219). New York, NY: New Paltz.

  • PlantE.A.HydeJ.S.KeltnerD. & DevineP.G. (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly248192.

  • PlantE.A.KlingK.C. & SmithG.L. (2004). The influence of gender and social role on the interpretation of facial expressions. Sex Roles51187196.

  • PoggiI. & PelachaudC. (2001). The Meanings of Gaze in Animated Faces. In P. McKevittS. Nuàllain & C. Mulvihill (Eds.). Language Vision and Music. Amsterdam: John Benjamins2001.

  • SearleJ.R.VandervekenD. (1985). The Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • SearleJ.R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.) Syntax and SemanticsVol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 5982). New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • WestC. 2003. The free speech argument against pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy33: 391422.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Upper face AUs that constitute non-verbal IFIDs for assertions (AU0), questions (AU2, AU1+4), orders (AU4+5), plus the ambiguous AU4+7 (Domaneschi et al., 2017)
  • View in gallery
    Screenshot of a trial example
  • View in gallery
    Predicted probabilities by speech act, action units and actor gender. Vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 112 112 11
Full Text Views 130 130 1
PDF Downloads 23 23 0
EPUB Downloads 4 4 0