Modeling Cultural Transmission of Rituals in Silico: The Advantages and Pitfalls of Agent-Based vs. System Dynamics Models
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Vojtěch Kaše in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Tomáš Hampejs in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Zdeněk Pospíšil in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article introduces an agent-based and a system-dynamics model investigating the cultural transmission of frequent collective rituals. It focuses on social function and cognitive attraction as independently affecting transmission. The models focus on the historical context of early Christian meals, where various theoretically inspiring trends in cultural transmission of rituals can be observed. The primary purpose of the article is to contribute to theorizing about cultural transmission of rituals by suggesting a clear operationalization of their social function and cognitive attraction. Furthermore, the article challenges recent trends in the field by providing a theoretically feasible model for how, under certain conditions, cognitive attraction can influence the transmission to a relatively greater extent than social function. In the system dynamics model we reproduce the results of our agent-based model while putting some of our basic operational assumptions under scrutiny. We consider approaching social function and cognitive attraction in isolation as a preliminary but necessary step in the process of creating more complex models of the cultural selection of rituals, where the two aspects will be combined to produce ritual forms with greater correspondence to real-world religious rituals.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ball, P. (2013). Why Society is a Complex Matter: Meeting Twenty-first Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science. Heidelberg: Springer.
-
Boyer, P., & Baumard, N. (2016). The Diversity of Religious Systems Across History: An Evolutionary Cognitive Approach. In T. K. Shackelford & J. R. Liddle (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Religion (pp. 1–25). New York: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.5
-
Conti, M., Passarella, A., & Pezzoni, F. (2011). A model for the generation of social network graphs. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, WoWMoM 2011 – Digital Proceedings. http://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986141
-
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(5), 178–190. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<178::AID-EVAN5>3.3.CO;2-P
-
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). How Do Rituals Affect Cooperation?: An Experimental Field Study Comparing Nine Ritual Types. Human Nature, 24(2), 115–125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9167-y
-
Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., Wilson, A., & Hood, B. M. (2009). Picasso Paintings, Moon Rocks, and Hand-Written Beatles Lyrics: Adults’ Evaluations of Authentic Objects. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9(1), 1–14.
-
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., & DeAngelis, D. L. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198, 115–126. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023
-
Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., Polhill, J. G., Giske, J., & Railsback, S. F. (2010). The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2760–2768. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.019
-
Grimm, V., Polhill, G., & Touza, J. (2013). Documenting Social Simulation Models: The ODD Protocol as a Standard. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating Social Complexity: A Handbook (pp. 117–133). Heidelberg: Springer. http://doi.org /10.1007/978-3-540-93813-2
-
Hood, B. M. (2009). SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable. San Francisco: HarperOne.
-
Hutson, M. (2012). The 7 Laws of Magical Thinking: How Irrational Beliefs Keep Us Happy, Healthy, and Sane. New York: Hudson Street Press.
-
Kapitány, R., & Nielsen, M. (2017). The ritual stance and the precaution system: the role of goal-demotion and opacity in ritual and everyday actions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(1), 27–42. http://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1141792
-
Kaše, V. (2018, in press). Ritualization of Early Christian Meals: The Earliest Evidence. In R. Uro, R. E. Demaris, J. Day, & R. Roitto (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Ritual (pp. 409–425). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Lang, M., Bahna, V., Shaver, J. H., Reddish, P., & Xygalatas, D. (2017). Sync to link: Endorphin- mediated synchrony effects on cooperation. Biological psychology, 127, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.06.001.
-
Liénard, P., & Boyer, P. (2006). Whence Collective Rituals? A Cultural Selection Model of Ritualized Behavior. American Anthropologist, 108(4), 814–827. http://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.4.814
-
Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, Magical, and Paranormal Beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 731–744. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
-
Llewelyn, S. R. (2001). The Use of Sunday for Meetings of Believers in the New Testament. Novum Testamentum, 43(3), 205–223. http://doi.org/10.1163/15685360152803601
-
McCauley, R. N., & Lawson, E. T. (2002). Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
McGowan, A. B. (2010). Rethinking Eucharistic Origins. Pacifica, 23, 173–191.
-
Mitkidis, P., Lienard, P., Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2014). Does Goal-Demotion Enhance Cooperation? Journal of Cognition & Culture, 14, 263–272.
-
Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2017). To Be in Synchrony or Not? A Meta-Analysis of Synchrony’s Effects on Behavior, Perception, Cognition and Affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009.
-
Müller, B., Bohn, F., Dreßler, G., Groeneveld, J., Klassert, C., Martin, R., & Schwarz, N. (2013). Describing Human Decisions in Agent-Based Models – ODD+D, an Extension of the ODD Protocol. Environmental Modelling and Software, 48, 37–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.003
-
Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2011). Spontaneous Processing of Functional and non-Functional Action Sequences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 18–30. http://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2010.550722
-
Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2011). Spontaneous Processing of Functional and non-Functional Action Sequences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 18–30. http://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2010.550722
-
Norenzayan, A. (2016). The Origins of Religion. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Willey.
-
Risen, J. L. (2016). Believing What We Do Not Believe: Acquiescence to Superstitious Beliefs and Other Powerful Intuitions. Psychological Review, 123(2), 182–207. http://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000017
-
Snoek, J. A. M. (2006). Defining “Rituals.” In J. Kreinath, J. Snoek, & M. Stausberg (Eds.), Theorizing Ritual: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts (pp. 3–14). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
-
Sørensen, J. (2007). A Cognitive Theory of Magic. London: AltaMira Press.
-
Stark, R. (2006). Cities of God: The Real Story of How Christianity Became an Urban Movement and Conquered Rome. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
-
Sterman J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
-
Subbotsky, E. (2010). Magic and the Mind: Mechanisms, Functions, and Development of Magical Thinking and Behavior. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Sutcliffe, A., Dunbar, R., Binder, J., & Arrow, H. (2012). Relationships and the social brain: Integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 149–168. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02061.x
-
Taussig, H. (2009). In the Beginning Was the Meal: Social Experimentation & Early Christian Identity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
-
Vyse, S. A. (2013). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Watson-Jones, R. E., & Legare, C. H. (2016). The Social Functions of Group Rituals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 42–46.
-
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014). The Ties that Bind Us: Ritual, Fusion, and Identification. Current Anthropology, 55(6). http://doi.org/10.1086/678698
-
Wildman, W. J., & Sosis, R. (2011). Stability of Groups with Costly Beliefs and Practices. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 14 (2011), 1–26.
-
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24, 1602–5. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472910
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1862 | 248 | 28 |
| Full Text Views | 347 | 13 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 261 | 18 | 5 |
Modeling Cultural Transmission of Rituals in Silico: The Advantages and Pitfalls of Agent-Based vs. System Dynamics Models
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Vojtěch Kaše in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tomáš Hampejs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zdeněk Pospíšil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article introduces an agent-based and a system-dynamics model investigating the cultural transmission of frequent collective rituals. It focuses on social function and cognitive attraction as independently affecting transmission. The models focus on the historical context of early Christian meals, where various theoretically inspiring trends in cultural transmission of rituals can be observed. The primary purpose of the article is to contribute to theorizing about cultural transmission of rituals by suggesting a clear operationalization of their social function and cognitive attraction. Furthermore, the article challenges recent trends in the field by providing a theoretically feasible model for how, under certain conditions, cognitive attraction can influence the transmission to a relatively greater extent than social function. In the system dynamics model we reproduce the results of our agent-based model while putting some of our basic operational assumptions under scrutiny. We consider approaching social function and cognitive attraction in isolation as a preliminary but necessary step in the process of creating more complex models of the cultural selection of rituals, where the two aspects will be combined to produce ritual forms with greater correspondence to real-world religious rituals.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1862 | 248 | 28 |
| Full Text Views | 347 | 13 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 261 | 18 | 5 |