Good Gods Almighty

A Report Concerning Divine Attributes from a Global Sample

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
View More View Less
  • * Fuller Theological Seminary, USA

Login via Institution

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

If “Big Gods” evolved in part because of their ability to morally regulate groups of people who cannot count on kin or reciprocal altruism to get along (Norenzayan, 2013), then powerful gods would tend to be good gods. If the mechanism for this cooperation is some kind of fear of supernatural punishment (Johnson & Bering, 2006), then we may expect that mighty gods tend to be punishing gods. The present study is a statistical analysis of superhuman being concepts from 20 countries on five continents to explore whether the goodness of a god is related to its mightiness. Gods that looked more like the God of classical theism and gods that were low in anthropomorphism were more likely to be regarded as morally good and to be the target of religious practices. Mighty gods were not, however, especially likely to punish or to be a “high god.”

  • Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37, 608619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrett, J. L., Shaw, R. D., Pfeiffer, J., & Grimes, J. (2019). Where the Gods Dwell: A Research Report. Journal of Cognition and Culture 19, 137152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boyer, Pascal. (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.

  • Database of Religious History. Retrieved November 2015. http://religiondatabase.org/landing/.

  • Johnson, D., & Bering, J. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology 4(1), 219233. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39, 165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Purzycki, B. G. (2013). Toward a Cognitive Ecology of Religious Concepts: An Example from the Tyva Republic. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1, 99120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shariff, A. F. & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Mean Gods Make Good People: Different Views of God Predict Cheating Behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 21, 8596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.556990.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 4(1), 2529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0071663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 244 160 5
Full Text Views 16 10 0
PDF Downloads 13 10 0