Save

Being Easy to Communicate Might Make Verdicts Based on Confessions More Legitimate

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
Authors:
Hugo Mercier Institut Jean Nicod, Département d’études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS Paris France

Search for other papers by Hugo Mercier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-7913
,
Anne-Sophie Hacquin Institut Jean Nicod, Département d’études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS Paris France

Search for other papers by Anne-Sophie Hacquin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-3614
, and
Nicolas Claidière Aix Marseille University, CNRS, LPC Marseille France

Search for other papers by Nicolas Claidière in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4472-6597
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

In many judicial systems, confessions are a requirement for criminal conviction. Even if confessions are intrinsically convincing, this might not entirely explain why they play such a paramount role. In addition, it has been suggested that confessions owe their importance to their legitimizing role, explaining why they could be required even when other evidence has convinced a judge. But why would confessions be particularly suited to justify verdicts? One possibility is that they can be more easily transmitted from one individual to the next, and thus spread in the population without losing their convincingness. 360 English-speaking participants were asked to evaluate the convincingness of one of three justifications for a verdict, grounded either in a confession, eyewitnesses, or circumstantial evidence, and to pass on that justification to another participant, who performed the same task. Then, 240 English-speaking participants evaluated the convincingness of some of the justifications produced by the first group of participants. Compared to the other justifications, justifications based on confessions lost less of their convincingness in the transmission process (small to medium effect sizes). Modeling pointed to the most common forms the justifications would take as they are transmitted, and results showed that the most common variant of the justification based on a confession was more convincing (small to medium effect sizes).

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 404 142 14
Full Text Views 12 6 1
PDF Views & Downloads 26 11 1