Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Folk Beliefs about Soul and Mind: Cross-Cultural Comparison of Folk Intuitions about the Ontology of the Person
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureAbstract
The present study addressed two related problems: The status of the concept of the soul in folk psychological conceptualizations across cultures, and the nature of mind-body dualism within Chinese folk psychology. We compared folk intuitions about three concepts – mind, body, and soul – among adults from China (N=257) and Poland (N=225). The questionnaire study comprised of questions about the functional and ontological nature of the three entities. The results show that the mind and soul are conceptualized differently in the two countries: The Chinese appear to think of the soul similarly to how they view the mind (importantly, they still seem to see it as separate from the body), while Poles differentiate it both in ontological and functional respects. The study provides important insights into cross-cultural differences in conceptualizing the soul as well as into the nature of Chinese mind-body dualism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Astuti, R., & Harris, P. L. (2008). Understanding Mortality and the Life of the Ancestors in Rural Madagascar. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(4), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802066907.
-
Barrett, J. L., & Hornbeck, R. G. (2017). Introduction: Homo Religious and the Dragon. In R. G. Hornbeck, J. L. Barrett, & M. Kang (Eds.), New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion, 2367–3494: Vol. 2. Religious cognition in China: “Homo religiosus” and the dragon / edited by Ryan G. Hornbeck, Justin L. Barrett, Madeleine Kang (pp. 1–14). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
-
Bell, C. (1989). Religion and Chinese Culture: Toward an Assessment of “Popular Religion”. History of Religions, 29(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1062838.
-
Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009101.
-
Bering, J. M., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2004). The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.217.
-
Bloom, I. (1997). Human Nature and Biological Nature in Mencius. Philosophy East and West, 47(1), 21–32.doi:10.2307/1400248.
-
Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human / Paul Bloom. London: William Heinemann.
-
Boeri, M. D., &Kanayama, Y. Y. (2018). General Introduction. In M. D. Boeri, Y. Y. Kanayama, & J. Mittelmann (Eds.), Studies in the history of philosophy of mind: volume 20. Soul and mind in Greek thought: Psychological issues in Plato and Aristotle / Marcelo D. Boeri, Yasuhira Y. Kanayama, Jorge Mittelmann, editors (Vol. 101, pp. 1–15). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78547-9_1.
-
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought ([ACLS Humanities E-Book edition]). New York: Basic Books. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.30744.0001.001.
-
Brashier, K. E., & 白瑞旭 (1996). Han Thanatology and the Division of “Souls”. Early China, 21, 125–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362502800003424.
-
Chudek, M., McNamara, R., Burch, S., & Bloom, P., Henrich, J. (2013). Developmental and cross-cultural evidence for intuitive dualism.
-
Cohen, E. (2011). The mind possessed: The cognition of spirit possession in an Afro-Brazilian religious tradition. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Cohen, E., & Barrett, J. (2008). When Minds Migrate: Conceptualizing Spirit Possession. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8(1–2), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/156770908X289198.
-
Davis, N. Z. (1982). From ‘Popular Religion’ to Religious Culture. In S. Ozment (Ed.), Reformation Europe: A Guide to Research (pp. 321–343). St. Louis: Center for Reformation Research.
-
Flanagan, O. J. (2003). The problem of the soul: Two visions of mind and how to reconcile them / Owen Flanagan. New York, Great Britain: BasicBooks.
-
Graham, A. C. (1989). Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
-
Gernet, J. (1985). China and the Christian Impact: A Conflict of Cultures (Janet Lloyd, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Guo, Q. (2003). LunZhongguoGudaiZheren de ShengcunlunZhihui論中國古代人的生存輪智慧. XueshuYuekan 學術月刊, 9, 95–103.
-
Hall, D, & Ames, R. (1987). Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Harrell, S. (1979). The Concept of Soul in Chinese Folk Religion. The Journal of Asian Studies, 38(3), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/2053785.
-
Harris, P. L., & Richert, R. (2006). The Ghost in My Body: Children’s Developing Concept of the Soul. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(3–4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853706778554913.
-
Harris, P. L., & Richert, R. (2008). Dualism Revisited: Body vs. Mind vs. Soul. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1163/156770908X289224.
-
Hornbeck, R. G., Barrett, J. L. [Justin L.], & Kang, M. (Eds.). (2017). New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion, 2367–3494: Vol. 2. Religious cognition in China: “Homo religiosus” and the dragon / edited by Ryan G. Hornbeck, Justin L. Barrett, Madeleine Kang. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
-
Ji, L.‑J., & Chan, E. (2017). Chinese Thinking Styles and Religion. In R. G. Hornbeck, J. L. Barrett, & M. Kang (Eds.), New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion, 2367–3494: Vol. 2. Religious cognition in China: “Homo religiosus” and the dragon / edited by Ryan G. Hornbeck, Justin L. Barrett, Madeleine Kang (pp. 35–54). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
-
Jullien, F. (2007). Vital nourishment: Departing from happiness / FrançoisJullien; translated by Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Zone; London: MIT [distributor].
-
Lewis, M. E. (2006). The construction of space in early China. SUNY series in Chinese philosophy and culture. New York: State University of New York; [Bristol: University Presses Marketing.
-
Li, Z., & Carleo, R. A. (2018). The origins of Chinese thought: From shamanism to ritual regulations and humaneness / by Li Zehou; translated by Robert A. Carleo III. Modern Chinese philosophy, 1875–9386: volume 17. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
-
Lillard, A. S. (1998). Ethnopsychologies: Cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychological bulletin, 123(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.3.
-
Lun, V. M.‑C., & Bond, M. H. (2013). Examining the relation of religion and spirituality to subjective well-being across national cultures. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033641.
-
Murphy, N. C. (2006). Bodies and souls, or spirited bodies? Current issues in theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0642/2006296139-d.html.
-
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.
-
Ostanina-Olszewska, J., & Despot, K. S. (2017). When “soul” is lost in translation: Metaphorical conceptions of “soul” in Dostoyevsky’s original “БратьяКарамазовы” (“The Brothers Karamazov”) and its translations into Polish, Croatian and English. Cognitive Studies | Étudescognitives. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1319.
-
Perkins, F. (2004). Leibniz and China: A commerce of light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519994.
-
Piedmont, R. L. (2009). The Contribution of Religiousness and Spirituality to Subjective Wellbeing and Satisfaction with Life. In M. de Souza, L. J. Francis, J. O’Higgins-Norman, & D. Scott (Eds.), International Handbooks of Religion and Education. International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care and Wellbeing (Vol. 3, pp. 89–105). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9018-9_6.
-
Seok, B. (2013). Embodied moral psychology and Confucian philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books.
-
Slingerland, E. (2017). China as the Radical “Other”: Lessons for the Cognitive Science of Religion. In R. G. Hornbeck, J. L. Barrett, & M. Kang (Eds.), New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion, 2367–3494: Vol. 2. Religious cognition in China: “Homo religiosus” and the dragon / edited by Ryan G. Hornbeck, Justin L. Barrett, Madeleine Kang (Vol. 2, pp. 55–76). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62954-4_4.
-
Slingerland, E. (2019). Mind and body in early China: Beyond Orientalism and the myth of holism / Edward Slingerland. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
-
Slingerland, E., & Chudek, M. (2011). The prevalence of mind-body dualism in early China. Cognitive Science, 35(5), 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01186.x.
-
Swinburne, R. (2013). Mind, brain, and free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Tang, Y. (2007). Ruxue de xiandaiyiyi 儒学的现代意义. JianghanLuntan 江汉论坛, 1, 1–14.
-
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1973). Outline of the History of Philosophy in Poland (Christopher Kasparek, Trans.). The Polish Review, XVIII(3), 73–85.
-
Teichman, J. (1974). The Mind and the Soul: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
-
Weber, M. (1922/1993). The Sociology of Religion (Ephraim Fischoff, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
-
Weber, M. (1951). The Religion of China. (Hans Gerth, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
-
Wierzbicka, A. (1989). Soul and Mind: Linguistic Evidence for Ethnopsychology and Cultural History. American Anthropologist, 91(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1989.91.1.02a00030.
-
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Wierzbicka, A. (2006). On Folk Conceptions of Mind, Agency and Morality. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853706776931286.
-
Yao, X., & Badham, P. (2007). Religious experience in contemporary China. Religion, education and culture. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
-
Yu, N. (2009). The Chinese heart in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Applications of cognitive linguistics: Vol. 12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Retrieved from http://reference-global.com/doi/book/10.1515/9783110213348https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213348.
-
Yuasa, Y., & Kasulis, T. P. (1987). The body: Toward an Eastern mind-body theory / YuasaYasuo; edited by Thomas P. Kasulis; translated by Nagatomo Shigenori, Thomas P. Kasulis. SUNY series in Buddhist studies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Zhang, L. (1998). Mighty Opposites: From Dichotomies to Differences in the Comparative Study of China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Zhang, Z. (2008). ZuoweiShentiZhexue de ZhongguoGudaiZhexue 作爲身體哲學的中國古代哲學. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 665 | 188 | 21 |
| Full Text Views | 44 | 20 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 91 | 35 | 3 |
Folk Beliefs about Soul and Mind: Cross-Cultural Comparison of Folk Intuitions about the Ontology of the Person
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureAbstract
The present study addressed two related problems: The status of the concept of the soul in folk psychological conceptualizations across cultures, and the nature of mind-body dualism within Chinese folk psychology. We compared folk intuitions about three concepts – mind, body, and soul – among adults from China (N=257) and Poland (N=225). The questionnaire study comprised of questions about the functional and ontological nature of the three entities. The results show that the mind and soul are conceptualized differently in the two countries: The Chinese appear to think of the soul similarly to how they view the mind (importantly, they still seem to see it as separate from the body), while Poles differentiate it both in ontological and functional respects. The study provides important insights into cross-cultural differences in conceptualizing the soul as well as into the nature of Chinese mind-body dualism.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 665 | 188 | 21 |
| Full Text Views | 44 | 20 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 91 | 35 | 3 |