Dehumanization is routinely invoked in social science and law as the primary factor in explaining how propaganda encourages support for, or participation in, violence against targeted outgroups. Yet the primacy of dehumanization is increasingly challenged by the apparent influence of revenge on collective violence. This study examines critically how various propaganda influence audiences. Although previous research stresses the dangers of dehumanizing propaganda, a recently published study found that only revenge propaganda significantly lowered outgroup empathy. Given the importance of these findings for law and the behavioral sciences, this research augments that recent study with two additional samples that were culturally distinct from the prior findings, showing again that only revenge propaganda was significant. To explore this effect further, we also conducted a facial electromyography (fEMG) among a small set of participants, finding that revenge triggered significantly stronger negative emotions against outgroups than dehumanization.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Atran, S. (2021). Psychology of transnational terrorism and extreme political conflict. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 471–501.
Badar, M. E. (2016). The road to genocide: The propaganda machine of the self- declared Islamic State (IS). International Criminal Law Review, 16(3), 361–411.
Badar, M. E., & Florijančič, P. (2020). The Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj: A symptom of the fragmented institutional criminalization of hate and fear propaganda. International Criminal Law Review, 1–87.
Benesch, S. (2012). The ghost of causation in international speech crime cases. In P. Dojčinović, (Ed.), Propaganda, war crimes trials and international law: From speakers’ corner to war crimes (pp. 254–268). Routledge.
Beyer, F., Münte, T. F., Erdmann, C., & Krämer, U. M. (2013). Emotional reactivity to threat modulates activity in mentalizing network during aggression. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(10), 1552–1560.
Boyer, P. (2018). Minds Make Societies: How Cognition Explains the World Humans Create. Yale University Press.
Bruneau, E., Jacoby, N., Kteily, N., & Axe, R. (2018). Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(7), 1078–1093.
Carver, R. (2000). Broadcasting and political transition: Rwanda and beyond. In J. Currey (Ed.), African Broadcast Cultures: Radio Transition (pp. 189–197). Oxford University Press.
Chester, D. S., & Martelli, A. M. (2020). Why revenge sometimes feels so good. In E. Worthington Jr. & N. G. Wade (Eds.), Handbook on Forgiveness, Second Edition (pp. 43–51). New York: Routledge.
Choi, J., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318(5850), 636–640.
Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 540–551.
Cramer, R., Clark, J., Kehn, A., Burks, A., & Wechsler, H. (2014). A mock juror investigation of blame attribution in the punishment of hate crime perpetrators. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(6), 551–557.
Cremin, M. R., & Popescu, B. G. (2021). Sticks and stones? Connecting insurgent propaganda with violent outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1–25.
Dojčinović, P. (2012). Propaganda, War Crimes Trials and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Routledge.
Dojčinović, P. (2019). Propaganda and International Criminal Law: From Cognition to Criminality. Routledge.
Everett, L., Worthington, J. R., & Wade, N. G. (Eds.) (2020). Handbook of Forgiveness, Second Edition. Routledge.
Fiske, A. P., & Rai, T. S. (2014). Virtuous Violence: Hurting and Killing to Create, Sustain, End, and Honor Social Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Fujii, L. A. (2009). Killing Neighbors: Webs of Violence in Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press.
Gao, Y., Glenn, A. L., Schug, R. A., Yang, Y., & Raine, A. (2009). The neurobiology of psychopathy: A neurodevelopmental perspective. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 813–823.
Hahn, R., Murray, J., & Carvalho, C. M. (2020). Bayesian regression models for causal inference: Regulation, confounding, and heterogenous effects. Bayesian Analysis, 15(3), 965–1056.
Harris, L. (2017). Invisible mind: Flexible social cognition and dehumanization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Harris, L., & Fiske, S.T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853.
Harris, L., & Fiske, S.T. (2009). Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanized perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 192–231.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.
Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon.
Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2019). Propaganda and Persuasion, Seventh Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Judah, T. (2010). The Serbs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kelman, H. C. (2017). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 25–61.
Kiper, J., Gwon, Y., & Wilson, R. A. (2020). How propaganda works: Nationalism, revenge, and empathy in Serbia. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 20, 403–431.
Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901.
Leader Maynard, J., & Benesch, S. (2016). Dangerous speech and dangerous ideology: An integrated model for monitoring and prevention. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 9(3), 70–95.
Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces (KDEF). CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institute, 91(630), 2-2.
Mathiak, K., & Weber, R. (2006). Toward brain correlates of natural behavior: fMRI during violent video games. Human Brain Mapping, 27(12), 948–956.
McCullough, M., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1–15.
Mercier, H. (2020). Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe. Princeton University Press.
Newsom, M. (2017). Football, fan violence, and identity fusion. International Review for the Sociology of Sport.
Oberschall, A. (2006). Vojislav Seselj’s nationalist propaganda: Contents, techniques, aims and impacts, 1990–1994. United Nations.
Oberschall, A. (2012). Propaganda, Hate Speech and Mass Killing. In Predrag Dojcinovic (Ed.), Propaganda, War Crimes Trials and International Law From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes (pp. 171–200). Routledge.
Petersen, M. B. (2020). The evolutionary psychology of mass mobilization: How disinformation and demagogues coordinate rather than manipulate. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 71–75.
Pratkanis, A., & Aronson, E. (2001). The Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. Holt.
Purzycki, B., & Lang, M. (2019). Identity fusion, outgroup relations, and sacrifice: A cross-cultural test. Cognition, 186, 1–6.
Rai, T. S., Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. (2017). Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral violence. PNAS, 114, 8511–8516.
Siever, L. J. (2008). Neurobiology of aggression and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 429–442.
Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Markowitz, D., Quist, A., & Västfjall, D. (2020). Virtuous violence from the war room to death row. PNAS, 117(34), 20474–20482.
Smith, D. L. (2018). Less than human: Why we demean, enslave, and exterminate others. St. Martin’s Press.
Straus, S. (2015). Making and Unmaking Nations: The Origins and Dynamics of Genocide in Contemporary Africa. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 103–129.
Valtora, R., Baldissarri, C., Andrighetto, L., & Volpato, C. (2021). Seeing others as a disease: The impact of physical (but not moral) disgust on biologization. International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 1–17.
Vollbgerg, M., Gaesser, B., & Cikara, M. (2021). Activating episodic simulation increases effective empathy. Cognition, 209, 104558.
West, J. D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2021). Misinformation in and about science. PNAS, 118(15), 1–8.
Wilson, R. A. (2015). Inciting Genocide with Words. Michigan Journal of International Law, 36, 278–320. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2439325.
Wilson, R. A. (2016). Propaganda and History in International Criminal Trials. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 14(3), 519.
Wilson, R. A. (2017). Incitement on Trial: Prosecuting International Speech Crimes. Cambridge University Press.
Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2014). Propaganda and conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan genocide. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, doi:10.1093/qje/qju020.
Zerback, T., Töpfl, F., & Knöpfle, M. (2021). The disconcerting potential of online disinformation. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1080–1098.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1111 | 712 | 79 |
Full Text Views | 478 | 43 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 610 | 63 | 0 |
Dehumanization is routinely invoked in social science and law as the primary factor in explaining how propaganda encourages support for, or participation in, violence against targeted outgroups. Yet the primacy of dehumanization is increasingly challenged by the apparent influence of revenge on collective violence. This study examines critically how various propaganda influence audiences. Although previous research stresses the dangers of dehumanizing propaganda, a recently published study found that only revenge propaganda significantly lowered outgroup empathy. Given the importance of these findings for law and the behavioral sciences, this research augments that recent study with two additional samples that were culturally distinct from the prior findings, showing again that only revenge propaganda was significant. To explore this effect further, we also conducted a facial electromyography (fEMG) among a small set of participants, finding that revenge triggered significantly stronger negative emotions against outgroups than dehumanization.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1111 | 712 | 79 |
Full Text Views | 478 | 43 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 610 | 63 | 0 |