Bound to Share or Not to Care. The Force of Fate, Gods, Luck, Chance and Choice across Cultures
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Renatas Berniūnas in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Audrius Beinorius in
Current site
Google Scholar
Postdoctoral Researcher, Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
Search for other papers by Vilius Dranseika in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Vytis Silius in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Paulius Rimkevičius in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
People across cultures consider everyday choices in the context of perceived various external life-determining forces: such as fate and gods (two teleological forces) and such notions as luck and chance (two non-teleological forces). There is little cross-cultural evidence (except for a belief in gods) showing how people relate these salient notions of life-determining forces to prosociality and a sense of well-being. The current paper provides preliminary cross-cultural data to address this gap. Results indicate that choice is the most important life-determining factor. Regression analyses indicate that choice and belief in gods and fate emerged as significant predictors of prosociality towards strangers. Moreover, luck was a significant predictor of decreased prosociality. A relation between life-determining forces and life satisfaction followed the same pattern: choice, gods, and fate emerged as significant predictors of greater life satisfaction, whereas luck was associated with decreased life satisfaction. The overall pattern of results indicates that participants across different cultures might sense being bounded to share or not to care depending on the perceived intentional agency and meaning in the external forces.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578.
-
Andre’, N. (2006). Good fortune, luck, opportunity and their lack: How do agents perceive them? Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1461–1472. 10.1016/j.paid .2005.10.022.
-
Au, E. W. M., Chiu, C., Zhang, Z., Mallorie, L., Chaturvedi, A., Viswanathan, M., & Savani, K. (2011). Maintaining faith in agency under immutable constraints: Cognitive consequences of believing in negotiable fate. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.578138.
-
Au, E. W. M., Chiu, C., Zhang, Z. X., Mallorie, L. A., Chaturvedi, A., Viswanathan, M., Savani, K. (2012). Negotiable Fate: Social Ecological Foundation and Psychological Functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(6), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111421632.
-
Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014). Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition, 133(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017.
-
Baumeister, R. F., & Brewer, L. E. (2012). Believing versus Disbelieving in Free Will: Correlates and Consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751–9004.2012.00458.x.
-
Baumeister, R. F., Clark, C., & Luguri, J. (2015). Free Will – Belief and Reality. In A. R. Mele (Ed.), Surrounding Free Will (pp. 49–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Baumeister, R. F., Crescioni, A. W., & Alquist, J. L. (2011). Free Will as Advanced Action Control for Human Social Life and Culture. Neuroethics, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-90584.
-
Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & DeWall, C. N. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 260–268. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208327217.
-
Berniūnas, R., Dranseika, V., & Delgermend, T. (2020). Between Karma and Buddha: prosocial behaviour among Mongolians in an anonymous economic game. The International Journal For The Psychology Of Religion, 30 (2), pp. 142–160. DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2019.1696497.
-
Berniūnas, R., Beinorius, A., Dranseika, V., Silius, V., & Rimkevičius, P. (2021). The weirdness of belief in free will. Consciousness and Cognition, 87, 103054.
-
Clobert, M., Saroglou, V., & Hwang, K.-K. (2015). Buddhist concepts as implicitly reducing prejudice and increasing prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, pp. 513–525.
-
Clobert, M., Saroglou, V., Hwang, K.-K., & Soong, W.-L. (2014). East Asian religious tolerance: A myth or a reality? Empirical investigations of religious prejudice in East Asian societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1515–1533.
-
Crescioni, A. W., Baumeister, R. F., Ainsworth, S. E., Ent, M., & Lambert, N. M. (2016). Subjective correlates and consequences of belief in free will. Philosophical Psychology, 29(1), 41–63.
-
Crone, D. L., & Levy, N. L. (2019). Are Free Will Believers Nicer People? (Four Studies Suggest Not). Soc Psychol Personal Sci, 10(5), 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618780732.
-
Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, pp. 486–511. 10.1037/t09477-000.
-
Day, L., & Maltby, J. (2003). Belief in good luck and psychological well-being: The mediating role of optimism and irrational beliefs. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 99–110. 10.1080/00223980309600602.
-
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
-
Ewusi-Boisvert, E., & Racine, E. (2018). A critical review of methodologies and results in recent research on belief in free will. Neuroethics, 11(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9346-3.
-
Feldman, G., Baumeister, R. F., & Wong, K. F. E. (2014). Free will is about choosing: The link between choice and the belief in free will. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.012.
-
Giner-Sorolla, R., Embley, J., & Johnson, L. (2019, December 4). Replication of Vohs & Schooler (2008, PS, Study 1). Retrieved from osf.io/i29mh.
-
Henrich, J. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
-
Heywood, B. T., & Bering, J. (2014). “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.782888.
-
Johnson, D. P. (2015). Big Gods, small wonder: Supernatural punishment strikes back. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 5 (4), 290–298. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2014.928356.
-
Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children intuitive theists? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, pp. 295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004 .00672.x.
-
Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1074–1083.
-
Krueger, F., Hoffman, M., Walter, H., & Grafman, J. (2014). An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 9(8), 1143–1149. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst092.
-
Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75, pp. 914–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386686.
-
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
-
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 1–57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
-
Markus, H. R., Uchida, Y., Omoregie, H., Townsend, S., & Kitayama, S. (2006). Going for the gold: Models of agency in Japanese and American contexts. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 103–112.
-
Markus, H. R., & Schwartz, B. (2010). Does choice mean freedom and well-being? Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 344–355.
-
Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2010). From uncaused will to conscious choice: The need to study, not speculate about people’s folk concept of free will. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, pp. 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0010-7.
-
Monroe, A. E., Brady, G. L., & Malle, F. M. (2017). This Is not the Free Will Worth Looking For: General Free Will Beliefs Do Not Influence Moral Judgments, Agent-Specific Choice Ascriptions Do. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616667616.
-
Nahmias, E., Morris, S., Nadelhoffer, T., & Turner, J. (2005). Surveying freedom: Folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500264180.
-
Nadelhoffer, T., Shepard, J., Nahmias, E., Sripada, C., & Ross, L. T. (2014). The free will inventory: Measuring beliefs about agency and responsibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.006.
-
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e1. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14001356.
-
Norenzayan, A., & Lee, A. (2010). It was meant to happen: Explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(5), 702–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019141.
-
Paulhus, D., & Carey, J. (2011). The FAD–Plus: Measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs. Journal of Personality and Assessment, 11(1), 96–104.
-
Pavot, W. G., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well- being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17.
-
Purzycki, B. G. (2010). Spirit masters, ritual cairns, and the adaptive religious system in Tyva. Sibirica, 9(2), 21–47.
-
Purzycki, B. G., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., Henrich, J., (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530, pp. 327–330. doi:10.1038/nature16980.
-
Rakos, R. F., Laurene, K. R., Skala, S., & Slane, S. (2008). Belief in free will: Measurement and conceptualisation innovations. Behavior and Social Issues, 17(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v17i1.1929.
-
Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K. J., & Kelemen, D. (2017). Cultural influences on the teleological stance: Evidence from China. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(1), 17–26.
-
Savani, K., Markus, H. R., Naidu, N. V. R., Kumar, S., and Berlia, N. (2010). What Counts as a Choice? U.S. Americans Are More Likely Than Indians to Construe Actions as Choices. Psychological Science, 21(3), 391–398.
-
Savani, K., Stephens, N. M., & Markus, H. R. (2011). The Unanticipated Interpersonal and Societal Consequences of Choice: Victim Blaming and Reduced Support for the Public Good. Psychological Science. 22(6), 795–802. doi:10.1177/0956797611407928.
-
Savani, K., & Rattan, A. (2012). A choice mindset increases the acceptance and maintenance of wealth inequality. Psychological Science, 23(7), 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434540.
-
Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 46–99. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2011.558707.
-
Schulz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. (2019). The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366 (6466), eaau5141.
-
Shariff, A. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2014). The world without free will. Scientific American, 310, 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican 0614-76.
-
Singh, M., Kaptchuk, T. J., and Henrich, J. (2021). Small gods, rituals, and cooperation: The Mentawai water spirit Sikameinan. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42:61–72.
-
Thompson, E. R., & Prendergast, G. P. (2013). Belief in luck and luckiness: conceptual clarification and new measure validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 501–506. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.027.
-
Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19, pp. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x.
-
Willard, A., Baimel, A., Turpin, H., Jong, J. & Whitehouse, H. (2020). Rewarding the good and punishing the bad: The role of karma and afterlife beliefs in shaping moral norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 385–396.
-
Woolley, J. D., & Kelley, K. A. (2020). “When something like a ladybug lands on you”: Origins and development of the concept of luck. Developmental psychology, 56(10), 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001104.
-
Young, M. J., Morris, M. W., Burrus, J., Krishnan, L., & Regmi, M. P. (2011). Deity and destiny: Patterns of fatalistic thinking in Christian and Hindu cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1030–1053. Doi: 10.1177/0022022110381123.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 199 | 199 | 40 |
| Full Text Views | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 21 | 21 | 2 |
Bound to Share or Not to Care. The Force of Fate, Gods, Luck, Chance and Choice across Cultures
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Renatas Berniūnas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Audrius Beinorius in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Postdoctoral Researcher, Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
Search for other papers by Vilius Dranseika in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vytis Silius in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paulius Rimkevičius in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
People across cultures consider everyday choices in the context of perceived various external life-determining forces: such as fate and gods (two teleological forces) and such notions as luck and chance (two non-teleological forces). There is little cross-cultural evidence (except for a belief in gods) showing how people relate these salient notions of life-determining forces to prosociality and a sense of well-being. The current paper provides preliminary cross-cultural data to address this gap. Results indicate that choice is the most important life-determining factor. Regression analyses indicate that choice and belief in gods and fate emerged as significant predictors of prosociality towards strangers. Moreover, luck was a significant predictor of decreased prosociality. A relation between life-determining forces and life satisfaction followed the same pattern: choice, gods, and fate emerged as significant predictors of greater life satisfaction, whereas luck was associated with decreased life satisfaction. The overall pattern of results indicates that participants across different cultures might sense being bounded to share or not to care depending on the perceived intentional agency and meaning in the external forces.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 199 | 199 | 40 |
| Full Text Views | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 21 | 21 | 2 |