Save

A Most Dangerous Tale: the Universality, Evolution, and Function of Blood Libels

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
Author:
Ákos Szegőfi Doctorate student, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University Vienna Austria

Search for other papers by Ákos Szegőfi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9130-766X
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Blood libels are narratives about Jews and Christians, featuring an accusation that a child or a woman had been kidnapped and assaulted due to religious or economic goals. Blood libel-like narratives, however, are not only found in Judeo-Christian history; they appear in many cultures. Using the framework of Cultural Attraction Theory, the paper considers their evolution, and identifies testable factors of attraction. The paper makes two claims regarding the morphology and the function of these ancient tales. Firstly, narratives about outgroups tend to evolve towards the shape of a blood libel, as it taps into an optimum number of universal cognitive preferences. The correspondence with the evolved features of the mind contributes to the success of the narrative in different cultures and time periods. Secondly, these narratives function as coalition signals. Upon calling ingroup members into action against an outgroup, the blood libel unifies audiences before engaging in exclusionary action.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 643 643 185
Full Text Views 18 18 3
PDF Views & Downloads 44 44 5