The Fall of Kinship: Towards an Epidemiological Explanation
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Paulo Sousa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Kinship used to be described as what anthropologists do. Today, many might well say that it is what anthropologists do not do. One possible explanation is that the notion of kinship fell off anthropology's radar due to the criticisms raised by Needham and Schneider among others, which supposedly demonstrated that kinship is not a sound theoretical concept. Drawing inspiration from epidemiological approaches to cultural phenomena, this article aims to enrich this explanation. Kinship became an unattractive theoretical concept in the subculture of anthropology not simply because of problems with kinship theory per se, but also on account of fundamental changes in the very conception of anthropological knowledge and the impact of these changes on the personal identity of anthropologists.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 565 | 147 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 216 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 142 | 33 | 0 |
The Fall of Kinship: Towards an Epidemiological Explanation
In: Journal of Cognition and CultureSearch for other papers by Paulo Sousa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Kinship used to be described as what anthropologists do. Today, many might well say that it is what anthropologists do not do. One possible explanation is that the notion of kinship fell off anthropology's radar due to the criticisms raised by Needham and Schneider among others, which supposedly demonstrated that kinship is not a sound theoretical concept. Drawing inspiration from epidemiological approaches to cultural phenomena, this article aims to enrich this explanation. Kinship became an unattractive theoretical concept in the subculture of anthropology not simply because of problems with kinship theory per se, but also on account of fundamental changes in the very conception of anthropological knowledge and the impact of these changes on the personal identity of anthropologists.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 565 | 147 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 216 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 142 | 33 | 0 |