Save

Counting in Tongan: The Traditional Number Systems and Their Cognitive Implications

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture
Authors:
Andrea BenderDepartment of Psychology, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, University of Freiburg, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Andrea Bender in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Sieghard BellerDepartment of Psychology, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, University of Freiburg, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Sieghard Beller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Is the application of more than one number system in a particular culture necessarily an indication of not having abstracted a general concept of number? Does this mean that specific number systems for certain objects are cognitively deficient? The opposite is the case with the traditional number systems in Tongan, where a consistent decimal system is supplemented by diverging systems for certain objects, in which 20 seems to play a special role. Based on an analysis of their linguistic, historical and cultural context, we will show that the supplementary systems did not precede the general system, but were rather derived from it. Especially when notation is lacking, having such supplementary systems can even yield cognitive advantages. In using larger counting units, they both abbreviate counting and expand the limits of the general system, thus facilitating the cognitive task of mental arithmetic.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 569 147 19
Full Text Views 194 16 3
PDF Views & Downloads 78 31 7