Shining Ideal and Uncertain Reality: Commentaries on the “Golden Rule” in Confucianism and Other Traditions

in Journal of Chinese Humanities
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This paper considers a number of problematic issues underlying the seemingly unassailable truth of moral philosophy expressed in the “Golden Rule” in a variety of cultural spheres. These issues include the place of this teaching within its given religious or philosophical context, the defense of this principle as an inviolable tenet of revealed dogma or as a piece of utilitarian advice for the regulation of social life, the manner in which the precise rhetorical structure of a given formulation reflects the specific intellectual underpinnings of its cultural milieu, claims of universal validity as a statement of moral truth for all men and all time or as a culture-specific value understood to apply exclusively within a particular religious community, and modes of commentarial expansion by scriptural exegetes and textual scholiasts seeking to ground this teaching within the logic of philosophical or theological discourse. After outlining several points of uncertainty that emerge in the context of transferring the ideal of human empathy to the messy reality of concrete existence, we then turn to a number of attempts by leading commentators in the Confucian, rabbinic, and other scholastic traditions to grapple with these contradictions and to reconcile them within the framework of their respective value systems.

Shining Ideal and Uncertain Reality: Commentaries on the “Golden Rule” in Confucianism and Other Traditions

in Journal of Chinese Humanities

Sections

References

AllinsonRobert “On the Negative Version of the Golden Rule as Formulated by Confucius” New Asia Academic Bulletin 1982 3 223 232

DihleAlbrecht Die goldene Regel: Eine Einführung in die Geschichte der antiken und frühchristlichen Vulgärethik 1962 Göttingen Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht

EriksonEric “The Golden Rule in the Light of New Insight” Insight and Responsibility 1964 New York W.W. Norton

FingaretteHarold “Following the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 1979 47 38 373 405

FreudSigmund StracheyJames Civilization and Its Discontents Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 1961 21 London Hogarth Press 108 116

GouldJames A. “The Golden Rule” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 1983 4 73 79

HarmanGilbert “Chapter iii: The Moral Law” The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics 1977 New York Oxford University Press 57 99

KantImmanuel PatonH.J. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals 1964 New York Harper and Row

NagelThomas The Possibility of Altruism 1970 Oxford Oxford University Press

NivisonDavid S. “Golden Rule Arguments in Chinese Moral Philosophy” The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy 1996 La Salle, IL Open Court Press

PhillipidisLeonidas Die goldene Regel religionsgeschichtlich Untersuch 1929 Leipzig A. Klein

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 136 136 17
Full Text Views 94 94 70
PDF Downloads 8 8 8
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0