The memorialization of the Nanjing Massacre, constructed almost fifty years after the event, poses challenges for historians. This article asks the simple question: why? Why has the evolution of memory in China and Japan circumvented the issues of Nanjing for nearly half a century before letting it erupt onto the international stage in the past few decades? By examining the circumstances surrounding the opening of Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall and its ensuing impact, this article not only attempts to shed light on how the memorial has been misconstrued in global historical memory, and the fundamental historiographical debates surrounding it, but also the utility of memory in historical narrative. When dealing with the ghosts of the past in the politics of the present, is it ever possible to purge historiography and memory of government?
BergerThomasMüllerJan-Werner“The Power of Memory and Memories of Power: The Cultural Parameters of German Foreign Policy-Making since 1945”Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past2002CambridgeCambridge University Press7699
GaoXingzuWuShiminHuYungongChaRuizhenGrayRobert“Riben diguo zhuyi he Nanjing datushua 日本帝國主義和南京大屠殺 [Japanese Imperialism and the Nanjing Massacre: Brutal Killings Committed by the Japanese Invasion Force in the Safety Zone]”China News Digest1996March23
TakanoriKatō“Nankin daigyakusatsu kinenkan baransu kaku tenjibutsu nitchūkan hatten no samatage [Damage Caused by the Unbalanced Interpretations of the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Exhibition]”Yomiuri shimbun2008January25
YangDaqingFujitaniTakashiWhiteGeoffreyYoneyamaLisa“The Malleable and the Contested: The Nanjing Massacre in Postwar China and Japan”Perilous Memories: The Asia-Pacific War(s)2001DurhamDuke University Press5087
Zhongguo zhongri guanxi yanjiuhui 中國中日關係研究會 [Chinese Association for the Study of the History of Sino-Japanese Relations]Riben de Zhongguo yimin 日本的中國移民 [Chinese Immigrants in Japan]1987BeijingShijie zhishi chubanshe
ZhuChengshan朱成山Qin-Hua rijun Nanjing datusha xingcunzhe zhengyanji 侵華日軍南京大屠殺倖存者證言集 [Collection of Testimonies by Survivors of the Nanjing Massacre during the Japanese Army Invasion]1994NanjingNanjing daxue chubanshe
ZhuChengshan朱成山ZhangQingbo張慶波Qin hua rijun Nanjing datusha yunan tongbao jinianguan chenzhan tuji 侵華日軍南京大屠殺遇難同胞紀念館陳展圖集 [A Pictorial Collection from the Memorial Hall of the Victims in Nanjing Massacre at the Hands of the Japanese Military]2008BeijingChangcheng chubanshe
James Burnham Sedgwick, “Memory on Trial: Constructing and Contesting the ‘Rape of Nanking’ at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946-1948,”Modern Asian Studies, 43, no. 5 (2009): 1232.
Ian Buruma, “Memories of the Nanjing Massacre Are Drenched in Politics: War and Remembrance,”Far Eastern Economic Review, 153, no. 36 (September 5, 1991): 51-52; Adam Phillips, “The Forgetting Museum,” Index on Censorship, 2 (2005).
Mark Eykholt, “Aggression, Victimization and Chinese Historiography of the Nanjing Massacre,” in The Nanjing Massacre in History and Historiography, ed. Joshua A. Fogel (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), 23.
Eykholt, “Aggression, Victimization and Chinese Historiography,”36; Daqing Yang, “The Malleable and the Contested: The Nanjing Massacre in Postwar China and Japan,” in Perilous Memories: The Asia-Pacific War(s), ed. Takashi Fujitani, Geoffrey White, and Lisa Yoneyama (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001), 76; Lucian W. Pye, “Memory, Imagination, and National Myth,” in Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia, ed. Gerrit Gong (Washington, dc: Center for Strategic & International Studies, 1996), 26.
Higashinakano Osamichi, “Aratamete ‘Rabe no nikki’ o tettei kensho suru [Thoroughly Examining the Diaries of Rabe Again],”Seiron, April 1998, 289; idem, “Nankin gyakusatsu” no tettei kensho [Solid Examination of the “Nanjing Massacre”] (Tokyo: Tentensha, 1999), 227.
Robert Barnett, “China—America’s Ally,”Far Eastern Pamphlet, 5 (1942): 9; Patrick Hein, How the Japanese Became Foreign to Themselves: The Impact of Globalization on the Private and Public Spheres in Japan (Berlin: lit, 2009), 118.
Thomas Berger, “The Power of Memory and Memories of Power: The Cultural Parameters of German Foreign Policy-Making since 1945,” in Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past, ed. Jan-Werner Müller (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 76-84; Eric Langenbacher and Yossi Shain, Power and the Past: Collective Memory and International Relations (Washington, dc: Georgetown University Press, 2010), 2.
Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II (New York: Basic Books, 2011), 6; Ian Buruma, Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan (New York: New York Review of Books, 1995).
Paul Williams, “The Atrocity Exhibition: Touring Cambodian Genocide Memorials,” in On Display: New Essays in Cultural Studies, ed. Anna Smith and Lydia Wevers (Wellington, nz: Victoria University Press, 2004), 197-204.
Zheng Wang, Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 95-96; Zhu Chengshan 朱成山 and Zhang Qingbo 張慶波, Qin hua rijun Nanjing datusha yunan tongbao jinianguan chenzhan tuji 侵華日軍南京大屠殺遇難同胞紀念館陳展圖集 [A Pictorial Collection from the Memorial Hall of the Victims in Nanjing Massacre at the Hands of the Japanese Military] (Beijing: Changcheng chubanshe, 2008), 292.
Katō Takanori, “Nankin daigyakusatsu kinenkan baransu kaku tenjibutsu nitchūkan hatten no samatage [Damage Caused by the Unbalanced Interpretations of the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Exhibition],”Yomiuri shimbun, January 25, 2008.