Building a Modern Political Ecology and the Need to Demystify Political Meritocracy

in Journal of Chinese Humanities
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

To construct socialism with Chinese characteristics, advance socialist democracy, and establish a political ecology for socialism with Chinese characteristics, we should devote our efforts toward building a stronger political system and strengthening the rule of law and democracy. Important projects, such as the anti-corruption campaign, mass-line education, or team building for government officials should be guided by the spirit of democracy and the rule of law and proceed in an orderly and regulated manner. Still, voices in support of political meritocracy have become increasingly audible in Chinese political and academic circles, supporting a political phenomenon completely incompatible with the goal of building a socialist democracy. Meritocracy as a political system entails a high degree of uncertainty, unsustainability, and risk and is essentially just a modified version of the rule of man or, to put it differently, the rule of man “2.0.” Its fatal weakness is its inability to resolve two fundamental problems related to the legitimacy of political power: Where does power originate, and how can we control it? An important theoretical prerequisite for building a clean political ecology is thus to demystify meritocracy and dispel any popular myths surrounding it.

Building a Modern Political Ecology and the Need to Demystify Political Meritocracy

in Journal of Chinese Humanities

Sections

References

  • BellDaniel [Bei Danning 貝淡寧]. “Cong ‘Yazhou jiazhiguan’ dao ‘xianneng zhengzhi’ 從‘亞洲價值觀’ 到 ‘賢能政治’ [From ‘Asian Values’ to ‘Political Meritocracy’].” Wen shi zhe 文史哲 [Journal of Literature History and Philosophy]no. 3 (2013): 5-11.

  • BellDaniel. “Xianneng zhengzhi shi ge hao dongxi 賢能政治是個好東西 [Political Meritocracy Is a Good Thing].” Dangdai shijie 當代世界 [Contemporary world]no. 8 (2012): 5-7.

  • BellDaniel. Xianneng zhengzhi: weishenme shangxian zhi bi xuanju minzhu zhi geng shihe Zhongguo 賢能政治: 為什麼尚賢制比選舉民主制更適合中國 [The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy]. Translated by Wu Wanwei. Beijing: CITIC Publishing Group2016.

  • Ge Quan 葛荃Quanli zaizhi lixing—shiren chuantong zhengzhi wenhua yu zhongguo shehui 權力宰製理性—士人傳統政治文化與中國社會 [Power Dominating Rationality: Literati Traditional Political Culture and Chinese Society]. Tianjin: Nankai University Press2003.

  • “Guanyu ‘zhengzhi shengtai’ Xi Jinping dou shuole shenme 關於‘政治生態’習近平都說了什麼 [What Did Xi Jinping Say about Political Ecology?].” Xinhua Wang 新華網 [Xinhua Net]November 32015. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-03/11/c_1114601310.htm.

  • JeffersonThomas. The Writings of Thomas Jeffersonvol. 15. Washington, DC: Lipscomb and Bergh1903-1904.

  • Jiang Feng 姜峰. “Sifa shencha de ‘zhengzhi baoxian lun’ 司法審查的‘政治保險論’ [‘Political Insurance’ Theory of Judicial Review].” Renda falü pinglun 人大法律評論 [Renmin University Law Review]no. 2 (2016): 445-463.

  • LeggeJames trans. The Sacred Books of China: The Texts of Confucianism Part I. Oxford: Clarendon Press1879.

  • LittlerJo. “Meritocracy as Plutocracy: The Marketising of ‘Equality’ Under Neoliberalism.” New Formationsnos. 80-81 (2013): 52-72.

  • Liu Jingxi 劉京希. Zhengzhi shengtai lun: zhengzhi fazhan de shengtaixue kaocha 政治生態論: 政治發展的生態學考察 [Political Ecology Theory: Observations on the Ecology of Political Development]. Jinan: Shandong daxue chubanshe2007.

  • SlingerlandEdward trans. Confucius Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett2003.

  • Wang Guoliang 王國良. “Rujia xianneng zhengzhi sixiang yu zhongguo xianneng tuiju zhidu de fazhan 儒家賢能政治思想與中國賢能推舉制度的發展 [Confucian Thought on Political Meritocracy and the Development of a Meritocratic Selection System for Office].” Wen shi zheno. 3 (2013): 24-31.

  • “Xi Jinping zhuchi zhaokai shan’ganning geming laoqu tuopin zhifu zuotanhui ceji 習近平主持召開陝甘寧革命老區脫貧致富座談會側記 [Sidelights on Xi Jinping Moderating the Opening of the Symposium on Poverty Alleviation for the Shaan-Gan-Ning Old Revolutionary Region].” Xinhua WangFebruary 162015. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-02/16/c_1114394435.htm.

  • Xu Jingbo 徐靜波. Riben ren de huofa 日本人的活法 [The Japanese Way of Life]. Beijing: Huawen chubanshe2017.

  • Yang Bojun 楊伯峻. Lunyu yizhu 論語譯注 [Translation and Commentary on the Analects]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company2002.

  • Zhang Moning 張墨寧. “Yi dangnei minzhu gaibian zhengzhi shengtai-zhuanfang zhongyang dangxiao dangjian jiaoyanbu zhuren Wang Changjiang jiaoshou 以黨內民主改變政治生態—專訪中央黨校黨建教研部主任王長江教授 [Using Inner-Party Democracy to Change Political Ecology: An Interview with Professor Wang Changjiang, Director of the Party Building Teaching and Research Department at the Central Party School].” Nanfeng Chuang 南風窗 [South Reviews]no. 21 (2014): 45-47.

  • “Zhongguo gongchandang zhongyang weiyuanhui guanyu jianguo yilai dang de ruogan lishi wenti de jueyi 中國共產黨中央委員會關於建國以來黨的若干歷史問題的決議 [Resolution on Certain Questions in the History of Our Party since the Founding of the People’s Republic of China].” Peking Reviewno. 27 (1981): 10-39.

  • Zhou Bingjun 周秉鈞 comm. Shangshu 尚書 [Book of Documents]. Changsha: Yuelu Press2001.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 231 231 131
Full Text Views 107 107 3
PDF Downloads 11 11 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0