A Critical Discussion of Daniel A. Bell’s Political Meritocracy

in Journal of Chinese Humanities
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

“Meritocracy” is among the political phenomena and political orientations found in modern Western democratic systems. Daniel A. Bell, however, imposes it on ancient Confucianism and contemporary China and refers to it in Chinese using loaded terms such as xianneng zhengzhi 賢能政治 and shangxian zhi 尚賢制. Bell’s “political meritocracy” not only consists of an anti-democratic political program but also is full of logical contradictions: at times, it is the antithesis of democracy, and, at other times, it is a supplement to democracy; sometimes it resolutely rejects democracy, and sometimes it desperately needs democratic mechanisms as the ultimate guarantee of its legitimacy. Bell’s criticism of democracy consists of untenable platitudes, and his defense of “political meritocracy” comprises a series of specious arguments. Ultimately, the main issue with “political meritocracy” is its blatant negation of popular sovereignty as well as the fact that it inherently represents a road leading directly to totalitarianism.

A Critical Discussion of Daniel A. Bell’s Political Meritocracy

in Journal of Chinese Humanities

Sections

References

  • BellDaniel [Bei Danning 貝淡寧]. “Cong ‘yazhou jiazhiguan’ dao ‘xianneng zhengzhi’ 從‘亞洲價值觀’ 到 ‘賢能政治’ [From ‘Asian Values’ to ‘Political Meritocracy’].” Wen shi zhe 文史哲 [Journal of Literature History and Philosophy]no. 3 (2013): 5-11.

  • BellDaniel. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press2015.

  • BellDaniel. Xianneng zhengzhi: weishenme shangxianzhi bi xuanju minzhuzhi geng shihe Zhongguo 賢能政治: 為什麼尚賢制比選舉民主制更適合中國 [The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy]. Translated by Wu Wanwei. Beijing: CITIC Publishing Group2016.

  • Del CoronaMarco. “Facciamo l’essame a chi comanda: Daniel A. Bell e la meritocrazia politica.” Corriere della seraMay 172015. http://leviedellasia.corriere.it/?r=4&s=daniel+a.+bell/.

  • Del CoronaMarco. “Zai yi ge xifang xuezhe yanzhong, zhongguo moshi meili hezai 在一個西方學者眼中, 中國模式魅力何在 [According to a Western Scholar, the China Model Is Full of Promises].” Translated by Liu Xushuang 劉旭爽. Guancha zheJuly 212015. http://www.guancha.cn/BeiDanNing/2015_07_21_327510.shtml.

  • FoxAlan. “Class and Equality.” In Socialist CommentaryMay (1956): 11-13.

  • Huang Yushun 黃玉順. “Guomin zhengzhi ruxue-rujia zhengzhi zhexue de xiandai zhuanxing 國民政治儒學—儒家政治哲學的現代轉型 [Confucianism’s Civic Politics: The Modern Transformation of Confucian Political Philosophy],” Dongyue luncongno. 11 (2015): 33-41.

  • Huang Yushun. “Lun ruxue de xiandai xing 論儒學的現代性 [A Discussion of Confucianism’s Modernity].” Shehui kexue yanjiuno. 6 (2016): 125-135.

  • Huang Yushun. “‘Yishen weiben’ yu ‘datong zhuyi’- ‘jiaguo tianxia’ huayu fansi yu ‘tianxia zhuyi’ guannian pipan ‘以身為本’ 與 ‘大同主義’—‘家國天下’ 話語反思與 ‘天下主義’ 觀念批判 [A Rethinking of the Discourse of the Nation under Heaven and a Critique of the Notion of the Heavenly Doctrine].” Tansuo yu zhengmingno. 1 (2016) 30-35.

  • Huang Yushun. Zhongguo zhengyilun de chongjian-rujia zhidu lunlixue de dangdai chanshi 中國正義論的重建—儒家制度倫理學的當代闡釋 [The Re-Establishment of the Chinese Theory of Justice: A Contemporary Interpretation of Confucian Ethics]. Hefei: Anhui People’s Publishing House2013. Translated into English as Voice from the East: The Chinese Theory of Justice. Translated by Hou Pingping and Wang Keyou. Reading UK: Paths International 2016.

  • Huang Yushun. Zhongguo zhengyilun de xingcheng—Zhou Kong Meng Xun de zhidu lunlixue chuantong 中國正義論的形成—周孔孟荀的制度倫理學傳統 [The Formation of a Chinese Theory of Justice: The Ethical Tradition from the Duke of Zhou to Confucius Mencius and Xun Zi]. Taipei: Eastern Publishing2015.

  • LeggeJames. The Analects of Confucius. In The Chinese Classicsvol. 1. Taipei: SMC2001.

  • LeggeJames. The Li Ki.” In The Sacred Books of the Eastvol. 28. Oxford: Clarendon Press1885.

  • LittlerJo. “Meritocracy as Plutocracy: The Marketising of ‘Equality’ under Neoliberalism.” New Formationsnos. 80-81 (2013): 52-72.

  • LuceEdward. “The End of American Meritocracy.” Financial TimesMay 82016. https://www.ft.com/content/c17d402a-12cf-11e6-839f-2922947098f0.

  • Shanghai guji chubanshe 上海古籍出版社. Shisanjing zhushu 十三經注疏. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe1997.

  • Wang Wenjin 王文錦. Liji yijie 禮記譯解 [Translation and Commentary on the Book of Rites]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company2001.

  • WeberMax. “Politics as Vocation (1919).” Translator unknown. http://anthropos-lab.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Weber-Politics-as-a-Vocation.pdf.

  • Yang Bojun 楊伯峻. Lunyu yizhu 論語譯注 [Translation and Commentary on the Analects]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company2002.

  • Ye Pengfei 葉鵬飛. “Sui you su er bude shi 雖有粟而不得食 [Although Revenues Are Being Made, People Can’t Enjoy Them].” Lianhe zaobaoAugust 42013. http://www.zaobao.com/forum/views/opinion/story20130804-236753/.

  • YoungMichael. “Down with Meritocracy.” The GuardianJune 292001. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2001/jun/29/comment/.

  • YoungMichael. The Rise of the Meritocracy (2d rev. ed.). London: Transaction Books2004.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 201 201 6
Full Text Views 121 121 12
PDF Downloads 17 17 4
EPUB Downloads 3 3 0