Throughout the history of East Asia, various polities in modern-day Korea, Japan, and Vietnam accepted investitures bestowed by the Chinese royal court. Many of these states also established their own vassal structures based on this tributary system. In light of this, it would be more accurate to describe the traditional international order of East Asia as a system of investitures and tributes, an “investiture-tribute system.” The significance of this system is the royal court being revered by its tributaries, which acknowledge it as the superior power. Looking at the vassal relationship between the Ming [1368-1644] and Qing [1644-1911] courts and the states of Joseon 朝鮮, Ryukyu 琉球, and Vietnam under various names, it is clear that the tributary system was a basic mechanism that facilitated bilateral trade, cultural exchange, border control, and judicial cooperation. Moreover, when vassal states encountered threats to their national security, the Chinese government assisted them with diplomatic and military resources befitting its position as the imperial court. Yet, although the tributary system enabled a relationship in which the royal court enjoyed a position of superiority and its vassal states an inferior one, none of the vassal states formed an alliance that revolved around the Chinese empire. Hence, in the near-modern period, the system struggled to contend with both the great world powers that made use of the treaty system and the expansion of Japan in East Asia.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ban Gu 班固. Hanshu 漢書 [The History of the Former Han Dynasty], annot. Yan Shigu 顏師古. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2000.
Bikers, Robert, ed. Ritual & Diplomacy: The Macartney Mission to China 1792-1794. London: British Association of Chinese Studies and Wellsweep Press, 1993.
Cameron, Nigel. Barbarians and Mandarins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Chaoxian wangchao shilu 朝鮮王朝實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty]. Available on the website of the National Institute of Korean History, http://sillok .history.go.kr.
Chen Shangsheng 陳尚勝. “Fenlie shidai de waijiao jingzheng: Wei-Jin Nan-Bei chao shiqi de Zhong-Han guanxi shuping 分裂時代的外交競爭:魏晉南北朝時期的中韓關係述評 [Diplomatic Competition in an Age of Division: Reviewing the Relationship between China and Korea during the Wei, Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties].” In Hanguoxue lunwenji 韓國學論文集 [Collected Papers on Korean Studies], ed. Beijing daxue hanguoxue yanjiu zhongxin 北京大學韓國學研究中心, 6.6-14. Beijing: Xinhua chubanshe, 1997.
Chen Shangsheng 陳尚勝. “Qing shi lu zhong de tianchao tizhi kaolun〈清實錄〉中的‘天朝體制’考論 [An Investigation of the ‘Celestial System’ in the Veritable Records of the Qing Dynasty].” In Ji’nan shixue 暨南史學 [Ji’nan Historiography], ed. Ma Mingda 馬明達 and Ji Zongan 紀宗安, 9.285-305. Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe, 2014.
Chen Shangsheng 陳尚勝. “Shilun Qing qianqi fenggong tixi de jiben tezheng 試論清前期封貢體系的基本特徵 [A Tentative Discussion on the Basic Features of the Investiture-Tribute System of the Early Qing Dynasty].” Qingshi yanjiu 清史研究, no. 2 (2010): 86-97.
Chen Shou 陳壽. San guo zhi 三國志 [Records of the Three Kingdoms], annot. Pei Songzhi 裴松之. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2000.
Chen Wenshou 陳文壽. Jinshi chuqi Riben yu Hua-Yi zhixu yanjiu 近世初期日本與華夷秩序研究 [Research on Japan and Hua-Yi Order during the Early Modern Period]. Hong Kong: Xianggang shehui kexue chubanshe, 2002.
Chen Zhiqi 陳志奇. Zhongguo jindai waijiaoshi 中國近代外交史 [A History of Chinese Foreign Relations in the Modern Era], part. 2. Taipei: Nantian shuju, 2003.
Cranmer-Byng, J. L. “The Chinese Perception of a World Order.” International Journal 24, no. 1 (1969): 166-171.
Da’nan shilu 大南實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Great South]. Tokyo: Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, 1961.
Danjō Hiroshi 檀上寛. Akiyo kaikin = chōkō shisutemu to Ka-I chitsujo 明代海禁=朝貢システムと華夷秩序 [The Ming-Dynasty Ban on Maritime Trade, the Tributary System and Hua-Yi Order]. Kyoto: Kyoto University Academic Press, 2013.
Daqing huidian: Yongzheng chao 大清會典·雍正朝 [Yongzheng Period in Collected Statutes of the Great Qing]. Beijing: Xianzhuang shuju, 2006.
Fairbank, John K. “On the Ch’ing Tributary System.” Journal of Asiatic Studies 6, no. 2 (1941): 135-246.
Fairbank, John K. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968.
Fan Shuzhi 樊樹志. “Wanli nianjian de Chaoxian zhanzheng 萬曆年間的朝鮮戰爭 [Military Conflict in Korea during the Reign of the Wanli Emperor].” Fudan xuebao 復旦學報, no. 6 (2003): 96-102.
Fu Baichen 付百臣. “Lüelun Riben zai Dongya chaogong tixi zhong de juese he zuoyong 略論日本在東亞朝貢體系中的角色和作用 [A Brief Discussion on the Role and Function of Japan in the East Asian Tributary System].” Shehui kexue zhanxian 社會科學戰線, no. 6 (2007): 150-155.
Fukuo Takeichirō 福尾猛市郎, ed. Nipponshi shiryō shūsei 日本史史料集成 [A Collection of Historical Materials on Japanese History]. Tokyo: Daiichi gakushūsha, 1980.
Gao Mingshi 高明士. Tianxia zhixu yu wenhuaquan de tansuo: yi Dongya gudai de zhengzhi yu jiaoyu wei zhongxin 天下秩序與文化圈的探索—以東亞古代的政治與教育為中心 [Exploring the World Order and Cultural Sphere of China with the Political and Education Systems of Ancient East Asia at Its Core]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2008.
Gu Tinglong 顧廷龍 and Dai Yi 戴逸, ed. Li Hongzhang quanji 李鴻章全集 [The Complete Works of Li Hongzhang]. Hefei: Anhui jiaoyu chubanshe, 2008.
Guo Tingyi 郭廷以 and Li Yushu 李毓澍, ed. Qingji Zhong-Ri-Han guanxi shiliao 清季中日韓關係史料 [Historical Records on Relations between the Late Qing, Japan, and Korea]. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo, 1972.
Guo Tingyi 郭廷以 and Wang Yujun 王聿均, ed. Zhong-Fa-Yuenan jiaoshe dang 中法越南交涉檔 [Archives on Representations Made by China, France, and Vietnam], vol. 1. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo, 1962.
Guoli gugong bowuyuan gugong wenxian bianji weiyuanhui 國立故宮博物院故宮文獻編輯委員會, ed. Gongzhongdang Yongzhengchao zouzhe 宮中檔雍正朝奏摺 [Memorials to the Emperor in the Yongzheng Imperial Archives]. Taipei: Gugong bowuyuan, 1978.
Guoli Taiwan daxue 國立台灣大學, ed. Lidai bao’an 歷代寶案 [Precious Documents of Successive Generations]. Taipei: Guoli Taiwan daxue, 1972.
Hamashita Takeshi 濱下武志, Zhu Yingui 朱蔭貴 and Ouyang Fei 歐陽菲, trans. Jindai Zhongguo de guoji qiji: Chaogong maoyi tixi yu jindai Yazhou jingjiquan 近代中國的國際契機:朝貢貿易體係與近代亞洲經濟圈 [International Opportunities in Modern China: The Tributary Trade System and the Modern Asian Economic Zone]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1999.
Han Dongyu 韓東育. “Hua-Yi zhixu de Dongya goujia yu zijieti neiqing 華夷秩序的東亞構架與自解體內情 [The Structure of ‘Hua-Yi Order’ in East Asia and How It Self-Disintegrated].” In Cong zhoubian kan Zhongguo 從周邊看中國 [Viewing China From the Peripheries], ed. Fudan daxue wenshi yanjiuyuan 復旦大學文史研究院, 79-90. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2009.
Hanguo minzu wenhua tuijin weiyuanhui 韓國民族文化推進委員會, ed. Hanguo wenji congkan 韓國文集叢刊 [The Collected Works of Korea]. Seoul: Minzu wenhua tuijinhui, 2003.
He Fangchuan 何芳川. “Hua-Yi zhixu lun 華夷秩序論 [‘Hua-Yi Order’ Theory].” Beijing daxue xuebao 北京大學學報, no. 6 (1998): 30-45.
Huang Zhilian 黃枝連. Yazhou de Huaxia zhixu: Zhongguo yu Yazhou guojia guanxi xingtai lun 亞洲的華夏秩序:中國與亞洲國家關係形態論 [Huaxia Order in Asia: A Morphological Theory on Relations between China and Other Asian Countries]. Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe, 1992.
Iwai Shigeki 岩井茂樹. “16-18 shiji dongya de guoji shangye yu hushi tizhi 16-18 世紀東亞的國際商業與互市體制 [The International Business and Mutual Trade System in East Asia from the Sixteenth to Eighteenth Century].” Higashi-Ajia kenkyū 東アジア研究 46 (2006): 3-24.
Jeong In Ji 鄭麟趾. Gaoli shi 高麗史 [A History of Korea]. Tokyo: Kokusho kankōkai, 1908.
Jeong Yong Hwa 鄭容和. “Cong zhoubian shijiao lai kan chaogong guanxi: Chaoxian wangchao dui chaogong tixi de renshi he liyong 從周邊視角來看朝貢關係:朝鮮王朝對朝貢體系的認識和利用 [Viewing the Tributary Relationship from a Peripheral Perspective: The Joseon Dynasty’s Understanding and Utilization of the Tributary System].” Guoji zhengzhi yanjiu 國際政治研究, no. 1 (2006): 72-87.
Kim, Key-Hiuk. The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order: Korea, Japan, and the Chinese Empire, 1860-1882. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.
Kimiya Yasuhiko 木宮泰彦. Hu Xinian 胡錫年, trans. Ri-Zhong wenhua jiaoliu shi 日中文化交流史 [A History of Cultural Exchange between Japan and China]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1980.
Kyōto shiseki-kai 京都史蹟会, ed. Hayashi Razan bunshū 林羅山文集 [Collected Works of Hayashi Razan]. Kyoto: Heian kōkogaku-kai, 1930.
Lee Man Un 李萬運. Zengbu wenxian beikao 增補文獻備考 [Reference on Supplementary Documents]. Seoul: Myeongmundang, 1959.
Li Dalong 李大龍. “Butong fanshu tixi de chongzu yu wangchao jiangyu de xingcheng 不同藩屬體系的重組與王朝疆域的形成 [The Restructuring of Different Vassal Systems and the Formation of Imperial Territories].” Zhongguo bianjiang shidi yanjiu 中國邊疆史地研究, no. 1 (2006): 14-23.
Li Dalong 李大龍. “Guanyu fanshu tizhi de jige lilun wenti: dui Zhongguo gudai jiangyu lilun fazhan de lilun chanshi 關於藩屬體制的幾個理論問題—對中國古代疆域理論發展的理論闡釋 [Some Theoretical Issues Related to the Vassal System: A Theoretical Interpretation of the Development of Ancient Chinese Periphery Theory].” Xuexi yu tansuo 學習與探索, no. 4 (2007): 223-231.
Liu Xu 劉昫 et al. Jiu Tang shu 舊唐書 [Old Book of Tang]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2000.
Liu Yuewu 柳嶽武. “Qingdai zhongqi yiqian Zhong-Chao zongfan guanxi xia de sifa yunzuo zhi yanjiu 清代中期以前中朝宗藩關係下的司法運作之研究 [Research into the Judicial Operations of the Chinese Imperial Court in the Context of Pre-Mid-Qing-Dynasty Vassal Relations].” Fujian shifan daxue xuebao 福建師範大學學報, no. 2 (2007): 94-101.
Ming shilu 明實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty]. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo, 1962.
Miyata Toshihiko 宮田俊彦. Ryūmin Ryūshin kōshō-shi no kenkyū 琉明・琉清交渉史の研究 [Research on the History of Diplomatic Representations between Ryukyu and the Ming and Qing Courts]. Tokyo: Bungaku shuppan, 1996.
Peyrefitte, Alain. Tingzhi de diguo 停滯的帝國 [The Immobile Empire], trans. Wang Guoqing 王國卿. Shanghai: Sanlian shudian, 1993.
Phan Thúc Trực 潘叔直, ed. Guoshi yibian: Mingming zhengyao: Rouyuan 國史遺編·明命政要·柔遠 [Remnants of the History of the Nation: Political Events of the Ming Dynasty: Pacification of the Distant Regions]. Hong Kong: New Asia Institute of Advanced Chinese Studies, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1965.
Qi Qizhang 戚其章. “Riben tunbing Liuqiu yu Zhong-Ri guanyu qiuan de jiaoshe 日本吞併琉球與中日關於球案的交涉 [Japan’s Annexation of Ryukyu and Diplomatic Representations Made by China and Japan about Ryukyu].” Ji’nan jiaoyu xueyuan xuebao 濟南教育學院學報, no. 5 (2000): 1-8.
Qing shilu 清實錄 [The Veritable Records of the Qing Dynasty]. Vols. 186, 245.
Riben waijiao wenshu 日本外交文書 [Diplomatic Documents of Japan], 11. 271-272.
Robinson, Kenneth R. “Centering the King Chosõn: Aspects of Korean Maritime Diplomacy, 1392-1592.” Journal of Asian Studies 59, no. 1 (February 2000): 109-125.
Rossabi, Morris. China and Inner Asia: From 1368 to the Present Day. London: Pica Press, 1975.
Seung Moon Won 承文院. Tongwen huikao 同文彙考 [Verifications of Collected Texts]. Seoul: Gugsapyeonchan-wiwonhoe, 1978.
Shang Huipeng 尚會鵬. “Lunren yu tianxia: jiedu yi chaogong tixi wei hexin de gudai dongya guoji zhixu 倫人與天下:解讀以朝貢體系為核心的古代東亞國際秩序 [‘Lunren’ and ‘Tianxia’: Deciphering the International Order of Ancient East Asia with the Tributary System at Its Core].” Guoji zhengzhi yanjiu, no. 2 (2009): 29-43.
Shao Xunzheng 邵循正. Zhong-Fa-Yuenan guanxi shimo 中法越南關係始末 [Relations between China, France, and Vietnam]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei jiaoyu chubanshe, 2000.
Sima Qian 司馬遷. Shiji 史記 [Records of the Grand Historian]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2000.
Singer, Aubery. The Lion and the Dragon: The Story of the First British Embassy to the Court of the Emperor Qianlong in Peking 1792-94. London: Barrie & Jenkins, 1992.
Spence, Jonathan, and John Wills, Jr., ed. From Ming to Qing: Conquest, Region and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century China. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.
Tang Xiyong 湯熙勇. “Qing Shunzhi zhi Qianlong shiqi Zhongguo jiuzhu Chaoxian hainanchuan ji piaoliumin de fangfa 清順治至乾隆時期中國救助朝鮮海難船及漂流民的方法 [How China Provided Relief to Korean Vessels and Individuals Affected by Maritime Disasters from the Reigns of the Shunzhi Emperor to the Qianlong Emperor of the Qing dynasty].” In Zhongguo haiyang fazhanshi lunwenji 中國海洋發展史論文集 [Collected Papers on the Maritime History of China], 8.105-172. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan zhongshan renwen shehui kexue yanjiusuo, 2002.
Tuo Jin 托津, ed. Qing huidian shili 清會典事例 [Examples of Qing Dynasty Statutes]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1991.
Virphol, Sarasin. Tribute and Profit: Sino-Siamese Trade, 1652-1853. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Wang Cungang 王存綱 and Liu Han 劉涵. “Chaogong tixi xia gudai Dongya zhixu xingcheng yu weixi de neizai luoji 朝貢體系下古代東亞秩序形成與維繫的內在邏輯 [The Internal Logic behind the Formation and Maintenance of Order in East Asia during Antiquity under the Tributary System].” Guoji anquan yanjiu 國際安全研究, no. 4 (2013): 145-155.
Wang Tieya 王鐵崖, ed. Zhongwai jiu yuezhang huibian 中外舊約章彙編 [A Compilation of Old International Treaties between China and Other Countries]. Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1957.
Wang Yanjie 王燕傑. “Shixi Qianlong ershijiu nian de Shengjing huishen: jian lun Shengjing huishen yu Fenghuang cheng huishen de chayi 試析乾隆二十九年的盛京會審:兼論盛京會審與鳳凰城會審的差異 [A Tentative Analysis of the Joint Trials Held in Shengjing in the 29th Year of the Reign of the Qianlong Emperor and a Discussion of Differences between the Joint Trials of Shengjing and Those of Fenghuangcheng].” Shehui kexue jikan 社會科學輯刊, no. 4 (2011): 146-151.
Wen Qing 文慶, Jia Zhen 賈楨 and Bao Yun 寶鋆 et al., ed. “Chouban yiwu shimo 籌辦夷務始末 [Foreign Affairs of the Late Qing Dynasty].” In Xuxiu siku quanshu 續修四庫全書 [A Continuation of the Complete Library of the Four Treasrties], Daoguang era 道光朝, 416.73.31-33. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 1996.
Xie Bizhen 謝必震. Ming-Qing Zhong-Liu hanghai maoyi yanjiu 明清中琉航海貿易研究 [Research into Ryukyu Navigation and Trade during the Ming and Qing Dynasties]. Beijing: Haiyang chubanshe, 2004.
Yu Xiaoguang 於曉光. “Mingchao yu Chaoxian weirao Nüzhenren de jiaoshe wenti yanjiu 明朝與朝鮮圍繞女真人的交涉問題研究 (1368-1619) [Research on Diplomatic Representations between the Ming Imperial Court and Korea Regarding the Jurchens].” PhD diss., Shandong University, 2006.
Yue Yang 岳陽. “Qing-Xian guanxi zhong de Chaoxian jizixing yanjiu 清鮮關係中的朝鮮齎咨行研究 [Research into Korean Jaejahaeng Envoys in the Context of Qing-Korean Relations].” Master’s thesis, Shandong University, 2010.
Zhang Cunwu 張存武. “Zhongguo dui xifang kuisi Liuqiu de fanying 中國對西方窺伺琉球的反應, 1840-1860 [China’s Reaction to the West’s Gaze on Ryukyu].” Jindaishi yanjiusuo jikan 近代史研究所集刊 16 (1987): 85-110.
Zhang Shengzhen 張聲振 and Guo Hongmao 郭洪茂. Zhong-Ri guanxishi 中日關係史 [A History of Sino-Japanese Relations]. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2006.
Zhang Tingyu 張廷玉 et al. Mingshi 明史 [The Official History of the Ming Dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2000.
Zheng Liangsheng 鄭樑生, ed. Ashita kankei-shi no kenkyū 明日関係史の研究 [Research on Relations between the Ming Dynasty and Japan]. Tokyo: Yuzankaku, 1995.
Zhongguo di yi lishi dang’anguan 中國第一歷史檔案館, ed. Qingdai Zhong-Chao guanxi dang’an shiliao xubian 清代中朝關係檔案史料續編 [Continuation of Historical Archives on Relations between China and Korea during the Qing Dynasty]. Beijing: Zhongguo dang’an chubanshe, 1998.
Zhongguo shixuehui 中國史學會, ed. Zhong-Fa zhanzheng 中法戰爭 [The Sino-French War], vol. 1. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1957.
Zhou Fangyin 周方銀 and Gao Cheng 高程, ed. Dongya zhixu: guannian, zhidu yu zhanlüe 東亞秩序:觀念,制度與戰略 [East Asian Order: Concepts, Systems, and Strategies]. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2012.
Zhuang Guotu 莊國土. “Lüelun chaogong zhidu de xuhuan: yi gudai Zhongguo yu Dongnanya de chaogong guanxi wei li 略論朝貢制度的虛幻:以古代中國與東南亞的朝貢關係為例 [A Brief Discussion on the Illusion of the Tributary System as Demonstrated by the Tributary Relations between China and East Asia during Antiquity].” Nanyang wenti yanjiu 南洋問題研究, no. 3 (2005): 1-8.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 114 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 1433 | 528 | 29 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 6460 | 1103 | 54 |
Throughout the history of East Asia, various polities in modern-day Korea, Japan, and Vietnam accepted investitures bestowed by the Chinese royal court. Many of these states also established their own vassal structures based on this tributary system. In light of this, it would be more accurate to describe the traditional international order of East Asia as a system of investitures and tributes, an “investiture-tribute system.” The significance of this system is the royal court being revered by its tributaries, which acknowledge it as the superior power. Looking at the vassal relationship between the Ming [1368-1644] and Qing [1644-1911] courts and the states of Joseon 朝鮮, Ryukyu 琉球, and Vietnam under various names, it is clear that the tributary system was a basic mechanism that facilitated bilateral trade, cultural exchange, border control, and judicial cooperation. Moreover, when vassal states encountered threats to their national security, the Chinese government assisted them with diplomatic and military resources befitting its position as the imperial court. Yet, although the tributary system enabled a relationship in which the royal court enjoyed a position of superiority and its vassal states an inferior one, none of the vassal states formed an alliance that revolved around the Chinese empire. Hence, in the near-modern period, the system struggled to contend with both the great world powers that made use of the treaty system and the expansion of Japan in East Asia.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 114 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 1433 | 528 | 29 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 6460 | 1103 | 54 |