Save

Doing Minority Justice Through Procedural Fairness: Face Veil Bans in Europe

In: Journal of Muslims in Europe
Authors:
Saïla Ouald Chaib a) saila.oualdchaib@ugent.be b) Eva.brems@ugent.be

Search for other papers by Saïla Ouald Chaib in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Eva Brems a) saila.oualdchaib@ugent.be b) Eva.brems@ugent.be

Search for other papers by Eva Brems in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The French and Belgian bans on face veils in public places have been subjected to strong substantive human rights critiques. This article takes a complementary approach, examining the bans from the perspective of procedural fairness. Indeed, the French and Belgian bans are extreme examples of legislative processes taking place above the heads of the people concerned, neglecting the ban’s possible human rights impact. After exploring what the social psychology notion of procedural fairness entails for the judiciary and the legislator, especially in a multicultural context, this article details procedural fairness shortcomings with respect to the face veil ban in France and Belgium. Subsequently, the article sets out how the European Court of Human Rights might compensate for these shortcomings.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 887 122 17
Full Text Views 272 18 6
PDF Views & Downloads 145 31 12