Transformations of the Secular and the ‘Muslim Question’. Revisiting the Historical Coincidence of Depillarisation and the Institutionalisation of Islam in The Netherlands

in Journal of Muslims in Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article revisits the ‘historical coincidence’ of the process of ‘depillarisation’ and the institutionalisation of Islam in the Netherlands. It critically considers the established Dutch narrative of pillarisation, i.e. the organisation of the social body along confessional or sectarian lines, and the way in which this historical formation of Dutch secularism is mobilised within contemporary discussions about multiculturalism. This article further explores how depillarisation accounts figure within ‘the Muslim question’ in the Netherlands. While acknowledging that depillarisation is a multidimensional concept, it engages the argument that, on a structural level, Muslim claims of recognition and institutionalisation vis-à-vis the Dutch state were crucial for the process of depillarisation. The article thus reverses the suggestion that Muslims arrived ‘too late’ in an already depillarized society, and draws attention to the constitutive role of Muslims in the ongoing process of nation-building and secularism in the Netherlands.

Transformations of the Secular and the ‘Muslim Question’. Revisiting the Historical Coincidence of Depillarisation and the Institutionalisation of Islam in The Netherlands

in Journal of Muslims in Europe

Sections

References

3

Asad TalalFormations of the Secular: Christianity Islam Modernity. (Stanford: Stanford University Press2003).

4

AsadSecular Formations p. 17.

7

Vink Maarten“Dutch ‘Multiculturalism’ Beyond the Pillarisation Myth”Political Studies Reviewvol. 5 (2007) p. 337.

10

See notably: Vink“Beyond the Pillarisation Myth”; Duyvendak, J.W. & P. Scholten, “Questioning the Dutch multicultural model of immigrant integration”Migrations Société (special issue ‘Beyond models of integration: France the Netherlands and the Crisis of National Models’ ed. C. Bertossi & J.W. Duyvendak) (2009); Maussen Marcel “Pillarization and Islam: Church-state traditions and Muslim claims for recognition in the Netherlands” Comparative European Politics vol. 10 3 (2012) pp. 337-353.

14

Vink“Beyond the Pillarisation Myth” p. 338.

18

Sunier Thijl“Verzuilen of niet? Dat is de vraag,” Tijdschrift voor Migratie- en Etnische Studies16:1 (2000) pp. 54-58.

19

Vink“Beyond the Pillarisation Myth” p. 339.

21

Lijphart ArendVerzuiling pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek (Amsterdam: De Bussy1968).

22

Hoogenboom MarcelEen miskende democratie. Een andere visie op verzuiling en politieke samenwerking in Nederland (Politiek Bestuurlijke Studiën 18) (Leiden: DSWO Press1996).

23

Dekker Paul & Peter Ester“Depillarization, Deconfessionalization and De-ideologization: Empirical Trends in Dutch Society 1958-1992”Review of Religious Research37:4 (1996) pp. 325-341.

25

Lijphart Arend“From the Politics of Accommodation to Adversarial Politics in the Netherlands—A Reassessment”West European Politics12:1 (1989).

26

van der Veer Peter“Pim Fortuyn, Theo van Gogh, and the Politics of Tolerance in the Netherlands”Public Culture18 1 (2006) pp. 111-124.

27

van der Veer‘The Politics of Tolerance’ p. 119.

28

van der Veer‘The Politics of Tolerance’ p. 120.

29

Lechner Frank J.“Secularization in the Netherlands?”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religionvol. 35 no. 3 (1996) pp. 252-264.

30

Dobbelaere Karel“Towards an Integrated perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization”Sociology of Religion60:3 (1999) pp. 229-247.

31

Lechner“Secularization in the Netherlands?” p. 258.

33

Dekker & Ester“Depillarization Deconfessionalization and De-ideologization” p. 331.

36

Rath et al.“The Politics of Recognizing Religious Diversity in Europe” p. 58.

37

Sunier Thijl“Naar een nieuwe schoolstrijd?”BMGN (Low Countries Historical Review) 4 (2004) p. 553.

38

Sunier“Naar een nieuwe schoolstrijd?” p. 552.

39

Sengers Erik“Dutch and Catholic. The Catholic Church and Dutch Catholics in the Dutch nation state since 1795”Religious Newcomers and the Nation State: Political Culture and Organized Religion in France and the NetherlandsEric Sengers & Thijl Sunier (eds.) (Delft: Eburon 2010). p. 80.

40

Sengers“Dutch and Catholic” p. 92.

41

Sengers“Dutch and Catholic” p. 92.

43

Knippenberg Hans“Assimilating Jews in Dutch nation-building: the missing pillar”Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie93: 2 (2002) pp. 191–207; Frishman Judith & Hetty Berg (eds.) Dutch Jewry in a Cultural Maelstrom 1880-1940 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2008).

44

Frishman & BergDutch Jewry in a Cultural Maelstrom pp. 9-10.

45

Fetzer Joel & Christopher SokerMuslims and the State in Britain France and Germany. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2005).

47

Rath et al.“The Politics of Recognizing Religious Diversity in Europe” p. 59.

49

Scott Joan WallachThe Politics of the Veil (Princeton: Princeton University Press2007).

52

See e.g. Amir-Moazami Schirin“Dialogue as a governmental technique: managing gendered Islam in Germany”Feminist Review98 (2011) pp. 9-27.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 20 20 13
Full Text Views 38 38 31
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0