The article explores ethical challenges in digital media ethnography in the field of militant political Islam, pointing to the dilemma that arises in doing research on Islam as part of the securitised research funding system. Expanding on discussions in anthropology about the principles of “do no harm” and “be open and honest about your work”, the authors reflectively contextualise the interrelated notions of “Jihadism” and “Salafism” and examine how these categories serve as “floating signifiers”. Examining one particular incident from the digital fieldwork leads to discussions of transparency, anonymity and shifting forms of “publicness” in the digital sphere.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Allen, Charlotte (1997). Spies Like Us: When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects, Lingua Franca. http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9711/9711.allen.html. Accessed 24 September 2019.
American Anthropological Association (2012). Full Text of the 2012 Ethics Statement: Principles of Professional Responsibility, AAA Ethics Forum. http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/. Accessed 25 September 2019.
Amir-Moazami, Schirin (2018a). Einleitung, in Shirin Amir-Moazami (ed.), Der inspizierte Muslim: zur Politisierung der Islamforschung in Europa. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 1-34.
Amir-Moazami, Shirin (ed.) (2018b). Der inspizierte Muslim: zur Politisierung der Islamforschung in Europa. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Atwan, Abdel Bari (2015). Islamic State: The Digital Caliphate. Oakland: Univ. of California Press.
CAIR Welcomes AP Stylebook Revision of “Islamist”—CAIR’, 5 April 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20150907184257/https:/www.cair.com/press-center/press-releases/11808-cair-welcomes-ap-stylebook-revision-of-islamist.html. Accessed 25 September 2019.
Calvey, David (2008). The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field. Sociology 42 (5), pp. 905-918.
Carvalho, Claudia (2014). ‘Okhti’ Online. Spanish Muslim Women Engaging Online Jihad—a Facebook Case Study.’ Online - Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet 6. https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/index.php/religions/article/view/17358/11169. Accessed 26 September 2019.
Carvalho, Claudia (2018). Women Who Run with the Wolves: Online Stories and Roles of Spanish-Speaking Jihadist Women. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
Coolsaet, Rik (2019). Radicalization: The Origins and Limits of a Contested Concept. In Nadja Fadil, Martijn de Koning, and Francesco Ragazzi (eds.), Radicalization in Belgium and the Netherlands: Critical Perspectives on Violence and Security. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 29-51.
Damir-Geilsdorf, Sabine, and Mira Menzfeld (2017). Who Are ‘the’ Salafis? Insights into Lifeworlds of Persons Connected to Salafis(m) in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Journal of Muslims in Europe 6 (1), pp. 22-51.
Damir-Geilsdorf, Sabine, and Mira Menzfeld (2016). ‘Looking at the Life of the Prophet and How He Dealt with All These Issues.’ Self-Positioning, Demarcations and Belongingness of German Salafis from an Emic Perspective’. Contemporary Islam 10 (3), pp. 433-454.
De Koning, Martijn (2019). ‘No, I’m not a Salafist’: Salafism, Secularism, and Securitization in the Netherlands. In Tahir Abbas and Sadek Hamid (eds.), Political Muslims: Understanding Youth Resistance in a Global Context. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, pp. 75-98.
De Koning, Martijn (2018) Ethnographie und der Sicherheitsblick: Akademische Forschung mit ‘salafistischen’ Muslimen in den Niederlanden. In Der inspizierte Muslim: zur Politisierung der Islamforschung in Europa, Shirin Amir-Moazami (ed.), 335-366. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2018.
Ess, Charles (2009). Digital Media Ethics. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Fadil, Nadia and Martijn De Koning (2019). Turning ‘Radicalization’ into Science: Ambivalent Translations into the Dutch (Speaking) Academic Field. In Nadia Fadil, Martijn de Koning, and Francesco Ragazzi (eds.), Radicalization in Belgium and the Netherlands: Critical Perspectives on Violence and Security. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 53-79.
Fadil, Nadia, Martijn de Koning, and Francesco Ragazzi (2019). Radicalization: Tracing the Trajectories of an ‘Empty Signifier’ in the Low Lands. In Nadia Fadil, Martijn de Koning, and Francesco Ragazzi (eds.), Radicalization in Belgium and the Netherlands: Critical Perspectives on Violence and Security, Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 3-27.
Fadil, Nadia, Martijn de Koning, and Francesco Ragazzi (eds.) (2019). Radicalization in Belgium and the Netherlands: Critical Perspectives on Violence and Security. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Floridi, Luciano (2013). Distributed Morality in an Information Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3), pp. 727-743.
Gauvain, Richard (2018). ‘Just Admit It Man, You’re a Spy!’ Fieldwork Explorations into the Notion of Salafi ‘Oppositionality’. Fieldwork in Religion 13 (2), pp. 203-230.
Hemmingsen, Ann-Sophie (2011). Salafi Jihadism: Relying on Fieldwork to Study Unorganized and Clandestine Phenomena. Ethnic & Racial Studies 34 (7), pp. 1201-1215.
Hirschkind, Charles (2012). Salafi Islam, Online Ethics and the Future of the Egyptian Revolution [Audio]. LSE Podcast. London. https://soundcloud.com/lsepodcasts/salafi-islam-online-ethics-and. Accessed 26 September 2019.
Hummel, Klaus, Melanie Kamp, and Riem Spielhaus (2016). Herausforderungen der Empirischen Forschung zu Salafismus: Bestandsaufnahme und Kritische Kommentare der Datenlage. HSFK-Reportagereihe ‘Salafismus in Deutschland’. Frankfurt a. Main: HSFK. https://salafismus.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/report0116.pdf. Accessed 27 September 2019.
Hutchinson, Jonathan, Fiona Martin, and Aim Sinpeng (2017). Chasing ISIS: Network Power, Distributed Ethics and Responsible Social Media Research. In Michael Zimmer and Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda (eds.), Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age: New Challenges, Cases, and Contexts, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 57-69.
Inge, Anabel (2016). The Making of a Salafi Muslim Woman: Paths to Conversion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiefer, Michael, Jörg Hüttermann, Bacem Dziri, Rauf Ceylan, Viktoria Roth, Fabian Srowig, and Andreas Zick (2017). ‘Lasset uns in sha’a Allah ein Plan machen’: Fallgestutzte Analyse der Radikalisierung einer WhatsApp-Gruppe. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Klausen, Jytte (2015). Tweeting the Jihad: Social Media Networks of Western Foreign Fighters in Syria and Iraq. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 38 (1), pp. 1-22.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London; New York: Verso.
Logvinov, Michail and Klaus Hummel (eds.) (2015). Gefährliche Nähe: Salafismus und Dschihadismus in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Press.
Marcus, George E. (1997). The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mise-En-Scène of Anthropological Fieldwork. Representations 59, pp. 85-108.
Markham, Annette, and Elizabeth Buchanan (2012). Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf. Accessed 27 September 2019.
Miller, Daniel, Elisabetta Costa, Nell Haynes, Tom McDonald, Razvan Nicolescu, Jolynna Sinanan, Juliano Speyer, and Xinyuan Wang (2016). How the World Changed Social Media. Why We Post. London: UCL Press. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474805/.
Moors, Annelies (2019). The trouble with transparency: Reconnecting ethics, integrity, epistemology, and power. Ethnography 20 (2), pp. 149-169.
Müller, Tobias (2018). Sicherheitswissen und Extremismus: Definitionsdynamiken in der deutschen Islampolitik. In Shirin Amir-Moazami (ed.), Der inspizierte Muslim: zur Politisierung der Islamforschung in Europa, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 185-214.
Peters, Rudolph (2005). Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader. Princeton: Marcus Wiener Publishing.
Pink, Sarah, Heather Horst, John Postill, Larissa Hjorth, Tania Lewis, and Jo Tacchi (2015). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Los Angeles et al.: Sage Publications.
Prucha, Nico (2016). IS and the Jihadist Information Highway—Projecting Influence and Religious Identity via Telegram. Perspectives on Terrorism 10 (6), pp. 48-58. http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/556.
Schmidt-Kleinert, Anja (2018). Ein kritischer Blick auf die Radikalisierungsforschung: Ein Essay. Demokratie gegen Menschenfeindlichkeit: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis, 3 (2), pp. 39-50.
Schreiber, Constantin (2017). Inside Islam: Was in Deutschlands Moscheen gepredigt wird. Berlin: Ullstein Buchverlage.
‘Seehofer: Der Islam gehört nicht zu Deutschland’ (2018). sueddeutsche.de. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/integration-seehofer-der-islam-gehoert-nicht-zu-deutschland-1.3908644. Accessed 27 September 2019.
Shoshan, Nitzan (2016). The Management of Hate: Nation, Affect, and the Governance of Right-Wing Extremism in Germany. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Wiktorowicz, Quintan (2006). Anatomy of the Salafi Movement. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29 (3), pp. 207-239.
Winter, Charlie (2018). Apocalypse, Later: A Longitudinal Study of the Islamic State Brand. Critical Studies in Media Communication 35 (1), pp. 103-121.
Zimmer, Michael, and Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda (2017). Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age: New Challenges, Cases, and Contexts. New York: Peter Lang, International Academic Publishers.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1802 | 251 | 23 |
Full Text Views | 202 | 18 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 325 | 40 | 0 |
The article explores ethical challenges in digital media ethnography in the field of militant political Islam, pointing to the dilemma that arises in doing research on Islam as part of the securitised research funding system. Expanding on discussions in anthropology about the principles of “do no harm” and “be open and honest about your work”, the authors reflectively contextualise the interrelated notions of “Jihadism” and “Salafism” and examine how these categories serve as “floating signifiers”. Examining one particular incident from the digital fieldwork leads to discussions of transparency, anonymity and shifting forms of “publicness” in the digital sphere.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1802 | 251 | 23 |
Full Text Views | 202 | 18 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 325 | 40 | 0 |