Northeast Asian Perspectives on UN Peacekeeping

China, Japan, Korea

in Journal of International Peacekeeping
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Peacekeeping operations are the most visible activity of the United Nations and widely considered an important tool for conflict resolution. For historical, cultural, and political reasons, however, states from Northeast Asia have been hesitant in their support, and limited in their contributions. Yet Northeast Asian regional actors are no longer as resistant to collective security and international governance initiatives as they have historically been portrayed. With the exception of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (dprk), a rogue regime often at loggerheads with the United Nations (un), and the Republic of China (roc) in Taiwan, a province currently denied independent un membership, the three remaining regional powers, the People’s Republic of China (prc), Japan, and the Republic of Korea (rok), have become increasingly engaged in regional and global peace operations. This engagement has picked up pace since the end of the Cold War in 1991. This article, therefore, examines the contributions to un peacekeeping operations by these three Northeast Asian powers. It further explores the motivational impetuses for policy changes and increasing contributions. Finally the paper assesses both the obstacles to, and the potential for future peacekeeping contributions emanating from the region.

Sections

References

5

Shulong Chu, ‘China, Asia and Issues of Sovereignty and Intervention’, Pugwash Occasional Papers, vol. 2, Jan. 2001, pp. 39–51.

10

Corinna Konrad, ‘The Japanese Approach: Tracks of Human Security Implementation’, Human Security Perspectives, vol. 1, issue 3, 2006, pp. 22–38.

11

Kathrin Hille, ‘China Commits Combat Troops to Mali’, Financial Times, 27 June 2013, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e46f3e42-defe-11e2-881f-00144feab7de.html#axzz3AyxCRECW (accessed on 20 August 2014.); ‘Over there. China Ponders Sending More Combat Troops on un Peacekeeping Missions’, The Economist, 15 July 2013, http://www.economist.com/news/china/21579495-china-ponders-sending-more-combat-troops-un-peacekeeping-missions-over-there (accessed on 20 August 2014). For further discussion on China’s participation in un peacekeeping operations, see Bates Gill and Chin-Hao Huang, China’s Expanding Role in Peacekeeping, Prospects and Policy Implications. sipri Policy Paper, 25 November 2009, http://books.sipri.org/files/PP/SIPRIPP25.pdf. (accessed on 17 August 2014); Chin-Hao Huang, Contributor Profile: The People’s Republic of China, http://www.ipinst.org/images/pdfs/china-hao130208.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2014); Sarah Teitt, ‘The Responsibility to Protect and China’s Peacekeeping Policy’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 18, no. 3, 2011, pp. 298–312 and Liu Tiewa, ‘Marching for a More Open, Confident and Responsible Great Power: Explaining China’s Involvement in un Peacekeeping Operations’, Journal of International Peacekeeping, vol. 13, issue 1–2, 2009, pp. 101–130.

21

Teitt, p. 2.

23

Teitt, p. 2.

28

Bert Edström, ‘Japan’s Foreign Policy and Human Security’, Japan Forum, vol. 15, issue 2, 2003, pp. 209–225, 220.

29

 See Brendan Howe, ‘Between Normality & Uniqueness: Unwrapping the Enigma of Japanese Security Policy Decision-Making’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 44, no. 6, 2010, pp. 1313–1336.

30

Kent E. Calder, ‘Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State’, World Politics, vol. 40, no. 4, 1988, pp. 517–541.

32

Keiko Hirata, ‘Japan as a Reactive State? Analyzing Japan’s Relations with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam’, Japanese Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1988, pp. 1–31.

34

Kevin Cooney, Japan’s Foreign Policy since 1945 (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2007), pp. 6–7.

43

Chi Young Pak, Korea and the United Nations (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000).

46

Kyudok Hong, ‘South Korean Approaches to Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead’, The Journal of East Asian Affairs, vol. 23, no. 1, 2009, pp. 23–46, 24.

47

Sangtu Ko, ‘Korea’s Middle Power Activism and Peacekeeping Operations’, Asia Europe Journal, vol. 10, 2012, pp. 287–299, 288.

55

Lee and Park, p. 2.

59

Jung-ho Nam, ‘Korea’s Duty in Peacekeeping. Participation in International Peacekeeping Activities Can Be a Precious Experience for a Divided Nation like Korea’, JoongAng Daily, 24th April 2008, http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2888998 (accessed on 17 August 2014).

68

Lee and Park, p. 4.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 2
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0