Arthur Danto, the End of Art, and the Philosophical View of History

In: Journal of the Philosophy of History
View More View Less
  • 1 VU University Amsterdam
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



This essay takes Arthur Danto’s end-of-art thesis as a case in point of a substantive philosophy of history. Such philosophy explains the direction that art has taken and why that direction could not have been different. Danto never scrutinized the philosophy of history that his end-of-art thesis presumes. I aim to do that by drawing a distinction between what I refer to as the common view of history and the philosophical view of history, and by arguing that we need the latter if we want to properly assess the plausibility of the end-of-art thesis.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 723 233 5
Full Text Views 101 25 1
PDF Views & Downloads 97 32 4