Hermeneutics and the Provisional Character of Dialogue

in Journal of the Philosophy of History
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The model of dialogue has been of crucial importance for the philosophical-hermeneutic account of interpretation ever since Schleiermacher. In this essay we investigate how contemporary hermeneutics accounts for this model in terms of provisionality and how the attention to provisionality marks the contemporary hermeneutic conception of interpretation. We will do so by first exploring how the theme of provisionality arises in Martin Heidegger’s work on interpretation: provisionality appears out of Heidegger’s concern with the primacy of anticipation in interpretation. Subsequently, we will show how Hans-Georg Gadamer’s attention to dialogue incorporates the theme of provisionality: since no dialogue ever truly comes to an end, every dialogue invites its own continuation. Finally, we will discuss how Jacques Derrida’s account of dialogue radicalizes the conception of this provisionality: despite its invitation for continuation, dialogues are radically interrupted; consequently, an additional work of interpretation is needed to continue a dialogue beyond these interruptions.

Hermeneutics and the Provisional Character of Dialogue

in Journal of the Philosophy of History

Sections

References

1

For a definition see B. VedderWandelen met woorden (Budel: Damon2001).

2

H.-G. Gadamer“Hermeneutik,” in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophieed. J. Ritter vol. 3 (Basel: Schwabe 1974) pp. 1061ff.

5

F. Rodi“Dilthey, Gadamer and ‘Traditional Hermeneutics’ ”Reports on Philosophy 7 (1983) 3–12.

6

S. ijsseling“Heidegger en het geschreven woord”Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 54 (1992) 195–213.

7

M. HeideggerParmenides (Frankfurt: Klostermann1982) pp. 131–132.

8

Th. Kisiel“Das Entstehen der Begriffsfeldes ‘Faktizität’ im Frühwerk Heideggers”Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften4 (1986/87) 91–120.

9

M. HeideggerOntologie. Hermeneutik der Faktizität (Frankfurt: Klostermann1988) p. 9. Translation taken from M. Heidegger Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity trans. J. Van Buren (Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1999). (Hereafter when quoting the English translation in the main text references will be made as #1/#2 where #1 refers to the page number in the German edition and #2 to the one in the English translation.) Heidegger mentions clearly that his concept of hermeneutics is not the same as Schleiermacher’s and Dilthey’s (Heidegger Ontologie p. 14).

13

M. HeideggerEinführung in die phänomenologische Forschung (Frankfurt: Klostermann1994) pp. 110 112.

16

M. HeideggerProlegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (Frankfurt: Klostermann1979) p. 356.

18

HeideggerProlegomena p. 257.

19

HeideggerSein und Zeit p. 150.

21

HeideggerSein und Zeit p. 392.

22

Ibid. p. 395.

26

M. HeideggerEinführung in die Metaphysik (Frankfurt: Klostermann1983) p. 123.

27

M. HeideggerKant und das Problem der Metaphysik (Frankfurt: Klostermann1993) p. xvii. Translation taken from M. Heidegger Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics trans. R. Taft (Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1997) p. xx.

28

HeideggerSein und Zeit p. 386.

29

S. IJsseling“Heidegger als interpretator. Bouwstenen voor een filosofische hermeneutiek”Tijdschrift voor Filosofie29 (1967) 65–97.

30

HeideggerEinführung in die Metaphysik p. 134.

31

H.-G. GadamerWahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1986) p. 245. Translation taken from H.-G. Gadamer Truth and Method trans. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall (London: Continuum 2004) p. 250.

32

J. GrondinHermeneutische Wahrheit? Zum Wahrheitsbegriff Hans-Georg Gadamers (Königstein: Athenäum1982) p. 108.

33

Ibid. p. 121.

35

Ibid. p. 445.

36

Ibid. p. 372.

37

Ibid. p. 283.

38

Ibid. p. 279.

39

H.-G. GadamerWahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen (Tübingen: Niemeyer1986) p. 52.

40

GadamerWahrheit und Methode p. 345.

42

GadamerWahrheit und Methode p. 375.

43

Ibid. p. 280.

44

I. Bocken“Concordia et Differentia. Tolerantie en waarheid volgens Nicolaus Cusanus”Bijdragen. Tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie57 (1996) 40–61.

45

GadamerWahrheit und Methode p. 277.

46

J. GrondinEinführung in die philosophische Hermeneutik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft1991) p. 152.

47

GadamerWahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen p. 195.

48

S. IJsselingRetoriek en Filosofie. Wat gebeurt er wanneer er gesproken wordt? (Bilthoven: Ambo1975).

49

GadamerWahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen p. 77.

51

GadamerTruth and Method p. 439.

52

Derrida“Rams” pp. 140–141.

53

DerridaSovereignties in Question p. 167.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 28 28 6
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0