Analogy, Natural History and the Philosophy of Nature

Kant, Herder and the Problem of Empirical Science

in Journal of the Philosophy of History
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In 1785 Kant published a series of critical reviews of Johann Gottfried Herder’s Ideas for a Philosophy of the History of Humanity (1784–1785), in which he not only challenges Herder’s conception of nature but also, and more importantly, his methodology. Kant’s complaint is that by relying on analogy, Herder draws deeply mistaken conclusions that overlook fundamental differences between human and nonhuman beings. But was Kant’s critique of Herder entirely fair? And how does it compare to Kant’s own use of analogy? My claim is that Herder’s use of analogy posed a fundamental methodological challenge to Kant, a challenge he sought to meet in the years following the reviews. In so doing, however, Kant found himself in the untenable situation of, on the one hand, granting analogy greater significance, and, on the other, severely restricting its use. By tracing the shifts in Kant’s thought through the lens of analogy, I aim to show that Kant’s transformed understanding of analogy reveals a fundamental tension between his a priori “metaphysics of nature” and empirical science, a tension that fundamentally shaped the philosophies of nature after Kant.

Sections

References

4

H.D. Irmscher, “Beobachtungen zur Funktion der Analogie im Denken Herders,” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 55 (1981), 64–97, at 65.

5

Zammito, Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology, 328.

8

See D. Whistler, “Post-Established Harmony: Kant and Analogy Reconsidered,” Sophia 52, no. 2 (2013), 235–258, at 8.

10

Kant, Logik-Vorlesung, 477–478.

13

See, for instance, H. B. Nisbet, Herder and the Philosophy and History of Science (Cambridge: Modern Humanities Research Association, 1970), 36; and Irmscher, “Beobachtungen,” 77.

17

E. Watkins, “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment,” Kant Yearbook 1 (2009), 197–222, at 220.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 5
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0