Ideas, Persons, and Objects in the History of Ideas

in Journal of the Philosophy of History
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The history of ideas is most prominently understood as a highly specialized group of methods for the study of abstract ideas, with both diachronic and synchronic aspects. While theorizing the field has focused on the methods of study, defining the object of study – ideas – has been neglected. But the development of the theories behind material culture studies poses a sharp challenge to this narrow approaches. It both challenges the integrity of the notion of abstract ideas and also offers possibilities for enlarging the scope of the ways in which we can study ideas historically. It is proposed here to regard ideas as mental relations deeply connected to human communication by both thinking and doing. This connection of ideational thought to human production and behavior is a deep foundation for the history of ideas as an interdisciplinary historiographic means of understanding moral life.

Ideas, Persons, and Objects in the History of Ideas

in Journal of the Philosophy of History

Sections

References

  • 5

    Mark BevirThe Logic of the History of Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1999). See also Simon Stow “Histories Logics and Politics: An Interview with Mark Bevir” Journal of Moral Philosophy vol. 2 no. 2 (2005): 203–216. Of the many discussion of Bevir’s book see Frank Ankersmit “Comments on Bevir’s the Logic of the History of Ideas” Rethinking History vol. 4 no. 3 (2000): 321–331; Daniel I. O’Neill “Revisiting the Middle Way: The ‘Logic of the History of Ideas’ After More Than a Decade” Journal of the History of Ideas vol. 73 no. 4 (October 2012): 583–592; Siep Stuurman “On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas” Rethinking History vol. 4 no. 3 (2000): 311–319; and collections of discussion (besides vol. 4 no. 3 of Rethinking History mentioned above) such as those in The History of European Ideas vol. 28 no. 1 (2002): 1–117); The History of the Human Sciences vol. 15 (200): 99–133; and Philosophical Books vol. 42 (2001): 161–95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Anthony Grafton“The History of Ideas: Precept and Practice, 1950–2000 and Beyond,” Journal of the History of Ideasvol. 67 no. 1 (Jan. 2006): 1–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Paul RicoeurHusserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press1967).

  • 18

    Dan Hicks“The Material-Cultural Turn: event and effect,” in The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studiesedited by D. Hicks and M. C. Beaudry 30 et passim (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Ian Hodder“The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View,” New Literary Historyvol. 45 no. 1 (Winter 2014): 19–36.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 142 142 9
Full Text Views 229 229 3
PDF Downloads 18 18 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0