Anthropology and Nonviolence: a Reflection on Peace from Nagasaki
In: Journal of Pacifism and NonviolenceAbstract
Despite their personal commitment to peace, anthropologists have an ambivalent relationship to pacifism and nonviolence. This is partly because violence is pervasive at all levels of interpersonal, intergroup, and international relations anthropologists routinely study. Ethnographic records show that violence of all kinds is part and parcel of human relationality. While there are many fine-grained analyses of conflicts, disputes, injustices, and inequalities, and their complex, and often long-term, consequences, pacifism and nonviolence have not been among the discipline’s explicit ethnographic or theoretical concerns. In this article I discuss the concept of “peace resources,” recently introduced by Japanese anthropologist Oda Hiroshi, as a possible starting point for more ethnographic and practical engagement with pacifism and nonviolence. I use my ethnographic observations of various activities aimed at the abolition of nuclear weapons taking place alongside the annual commemoration of the atomic bombing of Nagasaki on August 9th to examine the concept’s promise.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Anderson, Tom. (1997). “Art, Education, and the Bomb: Reflections on an International Children’s Peace Mural Project,” Journal of Social Theory in Art Education 17, pp. 71–97.
-
Anderson, Tom. (2000). “The Guernica Children’s Peace Mural Project,” Journal of Art and Design Education 19(2), pp. 141–152.
-
Briggs, Jean L. (1994). “‘Why Don’t You Kill Your Baby Brother?’: The Dynamics of Peace in Canadian Inuit Camps,” in: Leslie E. Sponsel and Thomas Gregor, eds., The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 155–181.
-
Butler, Judith. (2020). The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind. London and New York: Verso.
-
Das, Veena. (2010). “Engaging the Life of the Other: Love and Everyday Life,” in: Michael Lambek, ed., Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 376–399.
-
Dower, John W. 1995. “The Bombed: Hiroshimas and Nagasakis in Japanese Memory.” Diplomatic History 19(2), pp. 275–295.
-
Fry, Douglas P., and Geneviève Souillac. (2021). “Peaceful Societies are Not Utopian Fantasy. They Exist,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 22.
-
Galtung, Johan. (1964). “An Editorial,” Journal of Peace Research 1 (1), pp. 1–4.
-
Galtung, Johan. (1969). “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research,” Journal of Peace Research 6 (3), pp. 167–191.
-
Greenhouse, Carol J. (1985). “Mediation: A Comparative Approach,” Man, New Series, 20 (1), pp. 90–114.
-
Gregor, Thomas. (1994). “Symbols and Rituals of Peace in Brazil’s Upper Xingu,” in: Leslie E. Sponsel and Thomas, Gregor, eds., The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 241–257.
-
Gusterson, Hugh. (1996). Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Hirsch, Marianne. (2012). The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture after the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Koga, Yukiko. (2016). Inheritance of Loss: China, Japan, and the Political Economy of Redemption after Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Kwon, Heonik. (2020). “Anthropology and World Peace,” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 10 (2), pp. 279–288.
-
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1941). “An Anthropological Analysis of War,” American Journal of Sociology 46 (4), pp. 521–550.
-
Mauss, Mauss. ([1925] 1990). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by W.D. Halls. New York: W.W. Norton.
-
Mead, Margaret. ([1940] 2019). “War is Only an Invention: Not a Biological Necessity,” Asia 40, pp. 402–405. (Reprinted in: González, Roberto J, Hugh Gusterson, and Gustaaf Houtman, eds. [2019], Militarization, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 336–339).
-
Miyazaki, Hirokazu. (2020). “Artifact of Hope: The Journey of a Cross across the Pacific,” Berkley Forum (Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, Georgetown University), May 8th.
-
Miyazaki, Hirokazu. (2021). “Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Models of City Diplomacy,” Sustainability Science 16(4), pp. 1215–1228.
-
Miyazaki, Hirokazu, and Annelise Riles. (2022). “Theorizing Intergenerational Justice in International Law: The Case of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons,” UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 7, pp. 122–145.
-
Navaro, Yael, Zerrin Özlem Biner, Alice von Bieberstein, Seda Altuğ. (2021). Introduction, in: Yael Navaro, Zerrin Özlem Biner, Alice von Bieberstein and Seda Altuğ, eds., Reverberations: Violence Across Time and Space, Phildelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–30.
-
Oda, Hiroshi. (2014). “Heiwa no jinruigaku: joron,” [The anthropology of peace: An introduction], in: Hiroshi Oda and Yuji Seki, eds., Heiwa no jinruigaku [The anthropology of peace], Kyoto: Horitsu Bunka-sha, pp. 1–23.
-
Orr, James Joseph. (2001). The Victim as Hero: Ideologies of Peace and National Identity in Postwar Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
-
Ortner, Sherry B. (2016). “Dark Anthropology and Its Others: Theory Since the Eighties,” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1), pp. 47–73
-
Richards, Paul, ed. (2005). No Peace, No War: An Anthropology of Contemporary Armed Conflicts. Oxford: James Currey.
-
Robarchek, Clayton A. (1994). “Ghosts and Witches: The Psychocultural Dynamics of Semai Peacefulness,” in: Leslie E. Sponsel and Thomas Gregor, eds., The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 183–196.
-
Robbins, Joel. (2013). “Beyond the Suffering Subject: Toward an Anthropology of the Good,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(3), pp. 447–462.
-
Sponsel, Leslie E. (1994). “The Mutual Relevance of Anthropology and Peace Studies,” in: Leslie E. Sponsel and Thomas Gregor, eds., The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 1–36.
-
Sponsel, Leslie E. (2014). “The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence,” Diogenes (English ed.) 61 (3–4), pp. 30–45.
-
Strathern, Marilyn. (1985). “Discovering ‘Social Control,’” Journal of Law and Society 12 (2), pp. 111–134.
-
Taue, Tomihisa. (2020). “Nagasaki Peace Declaration,” August 9. Accessed: October 14, 2022: https://nagasakipeace.jp/content/files/abm/download/2020english.pdf.
-
Theidon, Kimberly Susan. (2013). Intimate Enemies: Violence and Reconciliation in Peru. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Venkatesan, Soumhya ed. (2015). “There is No Such Thing as the Good: The 2013 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory,” Critique of Anthropology 35(4), pp. 430–480.
-
Yoneyama, Lisa. (1999). Hiroshima Traces: Time, Space, and the Dialectics of Memory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 124 | 124 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 75 | 75 | 22 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 142 | 142 | 36 |
Anthropology and Nonviolence: a Reflection on Peace from Nagasaki
In: Journal of Pacifism and NonviolenceAbstract
Despite their personal commitment to peace, anthropologists have an ambivalent relationship to pacifism and nonviolence. This is partly because violence is pervasive at all levels of interpersonal, intergroup, and international relations anthropologists routinely study. Ethnographic records show that violence of all kinds is part and parcel of human relationality. While there are many fine-grained analyses of conflicts, disputes, injustices, and inequalities, and their complex, and often long-term, consequences, pacifism and nonviolence have not been among the discipline’s explicit ethnographic or theoretical concerns. In this article I discuss the concept of “peace resources,” recently introduced by Japanese anthropologist Oda Hiroshi, as a possible starting point for more ethnographic and practical engagement with pacifism and nonviolence. I use my ethnographic observations of various activities aimed at the abolition of nuclear weapons taking place alongside the annual commemoration of the atomic bombing of Nagasaki on August 9th to examine the concept’s promise.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 124 | 124 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 75 | 75 | 22 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 142 | 142 | 36 |