IPA and Science: A Response to Jonathan Smith

in Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article is a response to Jonathan Smith’s attempted rebuttal to the accusations I had made that Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis’s (IPA’s) methodical procedures did not meet generally accepted scientific criteria. Each of Smith’s defenses was carefully examined and found to be lacking. IPA’s claim to have roots in contemporary phenomenological philosophy was found to be seriously deficient and its claim that it has a basis in hermeneutics was superficial. IPA’s hesitation to proclaim fixed methods makes the possibility of replication of IPA studies impossible and thus it makes the fulfillment of an important scientific criterion impossible. Its claim that its findings are subjective fails to meet the important scientific criterion of objectivity or even intersubjectivity. Consequently, the claims that I made in my original article were basically sustained and repeated.

IPA and Science: A Response to Jonathan Smith

in Journal of Phenomenological Psychology

Sections

References

AddisonR. B., 'Grounded interpretive research: An investigation of physician socialization', in M. J. Packer and R. B. Addison (eds), Entering the circle. Hermeneutic investigations in psychology, (SUNY Press, Albany, N.Y. 1989) 39-57.

'Phenomenology and contemporary clinical practice' (2004) 35(No. 2Special Issue) Journal of Phenomenological Psychology.

EatoughV.SmithJ. A., 'Interpretive phenomenological analysis', in C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers (eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, (Sage Publications, London 2008) 179-194.

GadamerH.-G., Truth and method, (Sheed and Ward, London 1975) (German original 1960).

GiorgiA., The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach, (Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh PA 2009).

GiorgiA., 'Phenomenology and the practice of science' (2010) 21 Existential Analysis: 3-22.

HeideggerM.MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE., Being and Time, (Harper & Row, N. Y. 1962) (German original 1925).

HusserlE.ScanlonJ., Phenomenological Psychology: Lectures Summer Semester 1925, (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague 1977) (German original 1962).

HusserlE.KerstenF., Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Book One, (M. Nijhoff, The Hague 1983) (German original 1913).

KerstenF., Phenomenological method: Theory and practice, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1989).

MacDonaldP., 'Husserl’s preemptive responses to existentialist critiques' (2001) 1 Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology: 1-22.

Merleau-PontyM.SmithC., Phenomenology of Perception, (Humanities Press, N.Y. 1962) (French original 1945).

MohantyJ. N., Transcendental Phenomenology, (Blackwell, London 1989).

PackerM. J., 'Tracing the hermeneutic circle: Articulating an ontical study of moral conflicts', in M. J. Packer and R. B. Addison (eds), Entering the Circle: Hermeneutic Investigations in Psychology, (SUNY Press, Albany N.Y. 1989) 95-117.

ProctorR. W.CapaldiE. J., Why Science Matters: Understanding the methods of Psychological Research, (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2006).

SartreJ.-P.BarnesH., Being and Nothingness, (Philosophical Library, N.Y. 1956) (French original 1943).

ScanlonJ., 'Translator’s Introduction', in E. Husserl (ed), Phenomenological Psychology, (Nijhoff, The Hague 1977) ix-xv.

SmithJ. A., 'Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretive phenomenological analysis in health psychology' (1996) 11 Psychology and Health: 261-271.

SmithJ.A., 'Interpretive phenomenological analysis: A reply to Amedeo Giorgi' (2010) 21(2) Existential Analysis: 186-192.

SmithJ. A.OsbornM., 'Interpretive phenomenological analysis', in J. A. Smith (ed), Qualitative psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, (Sage Publications, London 2008) 53-80.

SmithJ. A.FlowersP.LarkinM., Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory Method and Research, (Sage Publications, London 2009).

WertzF., 'The method of eidetic intuition in psychology', in T. Cloonan and C. Thiboutot (eds), The Redirection of Psychology: Essays in Honor of Amedeo P. Giorgi, (CIRP, Montreal, Que. 2009).

ZahaviD., Husserl’s Phenomenology, (Stanford University Press, Stanford CA 2003).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 29
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0