A Phenomenological Analysis of the Experience of Security and Contentment for Latency Aged Children in Shared-time Parenting Arrangements

in Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This study explored the lived experience of security and contentment, and their absence, for latency-aged children (aged 8–12) living in shared-time parenting arrangements following their parents’ separation. A descriptive phenomenological methodology was utilized (Giorgi, 1985, 2009; Giorgi & Giorgi, 2003, 2008). Sixteen children living in shared-time were interviewed about their experiences of two phenomena: “feeling secure and content living in shared-time” and “not feeling secure and content living in shared-time.” The eight richest protocols were selected for analysis. The two resultant general structures and their core constituents are presented, and individual variations discussed. Central to each phenomenon is the parent/s’ capacity, or incapacity, to create and sustain a physical and emotional space in which the child feels secure and held in the mind, feels the arrangements are responsive to their needs, feels free to access the “absent” parent, and experiences integration between the two parental homes. Implications for phenomenological human science research are considered, including the use of descriptive phenomenology with children.

A Phenomenological Analysis of the Experience of Security and Contentment for Latency Aged Children in Shared-time Parenting Arrangements

in Journal of Phenomenological Psychology

Sections

References

AbarbanelA. Shared parenting after separation and divorce: A study of joint custody American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1979 49 2 320 329

AmatoP. R.CheadleJ. E. Parental divorce, marital conflict and children’s behavior problems: A comparison of adopted and biological children Social Forces 2008 86 3 1139 1161 Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=31673141&site=ehost-live

BirnbaumR.SainiM. A qualitative synthesis of children’s experiences of shared care post divorce International Journal of Children’s Rights 2015 23 1 109 132

BowlbyJ. Separation: Anxiety and anger 1973 London, UK Hogarth Press

BowlbyJ. Attachment and loss: Volume ii separation and anxiety 1980 2nd Ed. New York, NY Basic Books

BraverS. L.EllmanI. M.VotrubaA. M.FabriciusW. Lay judgments about child custody and divorce Psychology Public Policy and Law 2011 17 2 212 240

ButlerI.ScanlanL.RobinsonM.DouglasG.MurchM. Divorcing children: Children’s experience of their parents’ divorce 2003 London and New York Jessica Kingsley Publishers

CallowayG.ErardR. E. Introduction to the special issue on attachment and child custody Journal of Child Custody 2009 6 1–2 1 7 Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010324911&site=ehost-live

CarlbergM.HardyA.Elfver-LindstromE.JulinS. Alternating residency—different perspectives 2004 Sweden The National Board of Health and Welfare

CarlsundÅ.ErikssonU.LöfstedtP.SellströmE. Risk behaviour in Swedish adolescents: Is shared physical custody after divorce a risk or a protective factor? The European Journal of Public Health 2012 doi:10.1093/eurpub/cks011

CashmoreJ.ParkinsonP.WestonR.PatulnyR.RedmondG.QuL.KatzI. Shared care parenting arrangements since the 2006 Family Law Reforms: Report to the Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department 2010 Sydney, Australia Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales

ColaizziP. ValleR.KingM. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology 1978 New York Oxford University Press 48 71

DaviesH. Shared parenting or shared care? Learning from children’s experiences of a post-divorce shared care arrangement Children and Society 2013 doi:10.111/chso.12013

EmeryR. E.WaldronM.KitzmannK. M.AaronJ. Delinquent behavior, future divorce or nonmarital childbearing, and externalizing behavior among offspring: A 14-year prospective study Journal of Family Psychology 1999 13 4 568 579 doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.4.568

Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility Act) 2006 Australian Commonwealth Government

FabriciusW.SokolK.DiazP.BraverS. KuehnleK.DrozdL. Parenting time, parent conflict, parent-child relationships, and children’s physical health Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the Family Court 2011 Oxford, USA Oxford University Press 188 213

FabriciusW.BraverS.DiazP.VelezC. LambM. Custody and parenting time: Links to family relationships and wellbeing after divorce The father’s role in child development 2010 5th ed. New Jersey Wiley and Sons 201 260

FabriciusW. Listening to children of divorce: New findings that diverge from Wallerstein, Lewis, and Blakeslee Family Relations 2003 52 4 385 Retrieved from Fabricius W. & Hall J. (2000). Young adults’ perspectives on divorce: Living arrangements. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 38 446–461. Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119052386/PDFSTART

FehlbergB.SmythB. M. Caring for children after parental separation: Would legislation for shared parenting time help children? 2011 University of Oxford, UK Department of Social Policy and Intervention (Family Policy Briefing No. 7)

FehlbergB.SmythB.MacleanM.RobertsC. Legislating for shared time parenting after separation: A research review International Journal of Law Policy and the Family 2011 25 3 318 337 doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebr015

GiorgiA. GiorgiA. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method Phenomenology and psychological research 1985 Pittsburgh, PA Duquesne University Press 8 22

GiorgiA. Difficulties encountered in the application of the phenomenological method in the social sciences Analise Psicologica 2006 3 XXIV 353 361

GiorgiA. The descriptive phenomenological approach in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach 2009 Pittsburgh, PA Duquesne University Press

GiorgiA.GiorgiB. SmithJ. A. Phenomenology Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods 2003 1st Ed. London, UK Sage Publications 25 50

GiorgiA.GiorgiB. SmithJ. A. Phenomenology Qualitative psychology: A guide to research methods 2008 2nd Ed. London, UK Sage Publications 26 52

HallingS. Making phenomenology accessible to a wider audience Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 2002 33 1 19 38 doi:10.1163/156916202320900400

HaugenG. M. D. Children’s perspectives on everyday experiences of shared residence: Time, emotions and agency dilemmas Children & Society 2010 24 2 112 122 doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00198.x

HusserlE. FindlayJ. N. Logical investigations 1900/1970 London, UK Routledge and Kegan Paul [Logische Untersuchungen]

HusserlE. LandgrebeL. ChurchillJ. S.AmeriksK. Experience and judgment: Investigations in the geneology of logic 1973 London, UK Routledge and Kegan Paul

KaspiewR.GrayM.WestonR.MoloneyL.HandK.QuL.& the Family Law Evaluation Team Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms 2009 Melbourne, Australia Australian Institute of Family Studies

KellyJ. B.EmeryR. E. Children’s adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives Family Relations 2003 52 352 362

Kurki-SuonioK. Joint custody as an interpretation of the best interests of the child in critical and comparative perspective International Journal of Law Policy and the Family 2000 14 183 205

LangdridgeD. ‘The child’s relation with others’ Merleau-Ponty, embodiment and psychotherapy Existential Analysis 2005 16 1 87 99

LeeI.Koro-LjungbergM. A phenomenological study of Korean students’ acculturation in middle schools in the usa Journal of research in international education 2007 6 1 95 117

LodgeJ.AlexanderM. Views of adolescents in separated families: A study of adolescents’ experiences after the 2006 reforms to the family law system 2011 Melbourne, Australia Australian Institute of Family Studies

LuepnitzD. A. Child custody: A study of families after divorce 1982 Lexington, MA Lexington Books

McIntoshJ. E. Multiple loss: A phenomenolgical study of attachment and its felt absence in fostered children 1997 (Unpublished PhD). University of Melbourne Melbourne vic

McIntoshJ. E. Legislating for shared parenting: Exploring some underlying assumptions Family Court Review 2009 47 3 20 July 2009

McIntoshJ. E. Guest Editor’s Introduction to special issue on attachment theory, separation, and divorce: Forging coherent understandings for family law Family Court Review 2011 49 3 418 425 doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01382.x

McIntoshJ. E.ChisholmR. Cautionary notes on the shared care of children in conflicted parental separation Journal of Family Studies 2008 14 1 37 52

McIntoshJ. E.SmythB. KuehnleK.DrozdL. Shared-time parenting: An evidence-based matrix for evaluating risk Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the Family Court 2011 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press 155 187

McIntoshJ. E.SmythB. M.KelaherM.WellsY.LongC. Post-separation parenting arrangements and developmental outcomes for infants and children: Collected reports 2010 Canberra Australian Government Attorney General’s Department

McIntoshJ. E.SmythB. M.KelaherM.WellsY.LongC. Post-separation parenting arrangements: Patterns and developmental outcomes: Studies of two risk groups Family Matters 2011 86 40 48

Merleau- PontyM. CobbW. EdieJ. “The child’s relation with others The Primacy of perception 1964 Evanston, Il Northwestern University Press 96 158

MelliM. S.BrownP. R. Exploring A new family form—the shared time family International Journal of Law Policy and the Family 2008 22 2 231 269 doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn002

MillerS. Hearing from children who have diabetes Journal of child health care 1999 3 1 5 12

MoustakasC. Phenomenological research methods 1994 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications

NeohJ.Mellor Shared parenting: Adding children’s voices and their measures of adjustment to the evaluation Journal of child custody 2010 7 3 155 175 doi:10.1080/15379418.2010.512230

PolkinghorneD. E. ValleR. S.SteenH. Phenomenological research methods Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience 1989 First ed New York Plenum Press 41 62

RhoadesH. The dangers of shared care legislation: Why Australia needs (yet more) family law reform Federal Law Review 2008 36 3 279 299 Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;res=agispt;dn=20091168

RhoadesH.BoydS. B. Reforming custody laws: A comparative study International Journal of Law Policy and the Family 2004 18 2 119 146 doi:10.1093/lawfam/18.2.119

RybaT. V. Researching children in sport: Methodological reflections Journal of applied sport psychology 2008 20 334 348

SadowskiMcIntosh On laughter and loss: Children’s perspectives of parenting behaviors that enable security in shared-time parenting arrangements Childhood 2015 Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0907568215570072

SagesR.SzybekP. A phenomenological study of students’ knowledge of biology in a Swedish comprehensive school Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 2000 31 2 155 187

SmartC. From children’s shoes to children’s voices Family Court Review 2002 40 3 307 319 Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118930036/PDFSTART

SmartC. Equal shares: Rights for fathers or recognition for children? Critical Social Policy 2004 24 484 503

SmartC.NealeB.WadeA. The changing experience of childhood: Families and divorce 2001 Cambridge, UK Polity Press

SmythB. M. A 5-year retrospective of post-separation shared care research in Australia Journal of Family Studies 2009 15 1 36 59

SokolowskiR. Introduction to phenomenology 2000 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

St Luke’s Innovative Resources The Bears 2005 New edition available at http://www.innovativeresources.org/Pages/Our_Publications/Card_Range.aspx?id=625437e6-2a1a-44b5-833b-8c6325853ccf. Original Bear Cards available at http://www.qcards.com.au/the-bear-cards

SteinmanS. B. The experience of children in a joint-custody arrangement: A report of a study American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1981 31 3 403 414

SteinmanS. B. Joint custody: What we know, what we have yet to learn and the judicial and legislative implications University of California-Davis Law Review 1983 16 739 762

TrinderL. BainhamA.LindleyB.RichardsM.TrinderL. Introduction Children and their families: Contact rights and welfare 2003 Oxford and Portland, Oregon Hart Publishing 1 14

TrinderL. BainhamA.LindleyB.RichardsM.TrinderL. Introduction Children and their families: Contact rights and welfare 2003 Oxford, UK and Portland, OR Hart Publishing 1 14

TrinderL. Shared residence: A review of recent research evidence Child and Family Law Quarterly 2010 22 4 475 498

van KriekenR. The ‘best interests of the child’ and parental separation: On the ‘civilising of parents’ Modern Law Review 2005 68 1 25 48

WelshT. The child as natural phenomenologist: Primal and primary experience in Merleau-Ponty’s Psychology 2013 Chicago Northwestern University Press

WestonR.QuL.GrayM.DeMaioJ.KaspiewR.MoloneyL.HandK. Shared care time: An increasingly common arrangement? Family Matters 2011 88 51 56

ZukauskasP. R.SiltonN.AssumpcaoF. B. Temporality and Asperger’s Syndrome Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 2009 40 1 85 106

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Bear Card: Secure and content (images from The Bears reproduced with the permission of the publisher, St Luke’s Innovative Resources).
  • View in gallery
    Bear Cards: Not secure and content (images from The Bears reproduced with the permission of the publisher, St Luke’s Innovative Resources).
  • View in gallery
    Giselle’s Drawing: Feeling secure and content in shared-time.
  • View in gallery
    Clare’s Drawing: Feeling secure and content in shared-time.
  • View in gallery
    Pablo’s Drawing: Not feeling secure and content in shared-time.
  • View in gallery
    Tabitha’s Drawing: Not feeling secure and content in shared-time.
  • View in gallery
    Clare’s Drawing: Not feeling secure and content in shared-time.
  • View in gallery
    Shane’s Drawing: Not feeling secure and content in shared-time.Clare’s Drawing: Not feeling secure and content in shared-time.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 14 14 8
Full Text Views 14 14 14
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0