On the Benefit of a Phenomenological Revision of Problem Solving

in Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Problem solving has been empirical psychology’s concern for half a century. Cognitive science’s work on this field has been stimulated especially by the computational theory of mind. As a result, most experimental research originates from a mechanistic approach that disregards genuine experience. On the occasion of a review of problem solving’s foundation, a phenomenological description offers fruitful perspectives. Yet, the mechanistic paradigm is currently dominant throughout problem solving’s established patterns of description. The review starts with a critical historical analysis of the state of problem solving in academic psychology. Subsequently, a phenomenological, contrastive approach is proposed. It questions the notion of problems as “goal-driven” behavior by making vivid experience the subject of discussion. As its given compounds, solvability, oppressiveness, and the problem’s horizon are discussed. Ultimately, an experience-based multimodal notion of the problem is elaborated that relates problems to challenges, fatalities and opportunities as different types of situations.

On the Benefit of a Phenomenological Revision of Problem Solving

in Journal of Phenomenological Psychology

Sections

References

AanstoosC. M. (1983). The think aloud method in descriptive research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology14 (2) 243266.

AanstoosC. M. (1987). A critique of the computational model of thought: The contribution of Merleau-Ponty. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology18 (2) 187200.

BitbolM. & PetitmenginC. (2013). A defense of introspection from within. Constructivist Foundations8 (3) 269279.

DillonJ. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior 16 (2)97111.

DunckerK. (1974). Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens. Berlin.

FahrenbergJ. (2015). Theoretische Psychologie–Eine Systematik der Kontroversen. Lengerich.

FrederiksenN. (1984). The Real Test Bias: Influences of Testing on Teaching and Learning. American Psychologist 39 (3) 193202.

FrenschP.A. & FunkeJ. (Eds.) (1995): Complex problem solving: The European perspective. Hillsdale.

FunkeJ. (2012). Complex problem solving; in SeelN. M. (Ed.): Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Heidelberg682685.

FunkeJ. (2014). Problem solving: What are the important questions?; in: P. BelloM. GuariniM. McShaneB. Scassellati (Eds.) Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 493498). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

GehlenA. (2009). Der Mensch. Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt. Wiebelsheim.

GetzelsJ. W. (1982). The problem of the problem. New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Question framing and response consistency 113749.

GrathoffR. (1995). Milieu und Lebenswelt. Einfuhrung in die phanomenologische Soziologie und die sozial-phanomenologische Forschung. Frankfurt am Main.

HuttoD. D. (2008). Articulating and understanding the phenomenological manifesto. Abstracta4 (3) 1019.

JäkelF. & SchreiberC. (2013). Introspection in problem solving. The Journal of Problem Solving6 (1) 2033.

LeeH.YounsoonC. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem situation. The Journal of Educational Research 101 (2) 113123.

MacGregorJ. N.OrmerodT. C.ChronicleE. P. (2001). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 27 (1) 176249.

MumfordM. D. & FleishmanE. A. (1994). Cognitive principles and training program design: Knowledge processes and application. Unpublished manuscript.

NewellA. & SimonH. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

NerneyG. (1979). The Gestalt of Problem-Solving: An Interpretation of Max Wertheimer’s” Productive Thinking”. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology10 (1) 5680.

OhlssonS. (1984). Restructuring revisited I. Summary and critique of the Gestalt theory of problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology25 (1) 6578.

OhlssonS. (2012). The Problems with Problem Solving: Reflections on the Rise, Current Status, and Possible Future of a Cognitive Research Paradigm. The Journal of Problem Solving 5 (1) 101128.

PólyaG. (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton.

PopperK. R. (1999). All life is problem solving. Psychology Press.

QuesadaJ.KintschW.GomezE. (2005). Complex problem-solving: a field in search of a definition? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 6 (1) 533.

RadleyA. (1991). Solving a Problem Together: A Study of Thinking in Small Groups. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology22 (1) 3959.

RuncoM. A. & NemiroJ. (1994). Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness. Roeper Review 16 (4) 235241.

SchmitzH. (1990). Der unerschöpfliche Gegenstand. Grundzüge der Philosophie. Bonn.

SchützA.LuckmannT. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz.

SimonH.A. & LeaG. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view; in: GreggL.W. (Ed.) Knowledge and Cognition. Pocmac, Maryland105128.

SimonH.A. & NewellA. (1971). Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist 26 (2) 145159.

SpiegelbergH. (1972). Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry. Nortwestern University Press Evanston.

WertzF. J. (1993). Cognitive psychology: A phenomenological critique. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology13 (1) 224.

WoodworthR. S. (1938). Experimental Psychology. New York.

ZahaviD. & GallagherS. (2008). Reply: A Phenomenology with Legs and Brains. Abstracta4 (3) 86107.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 45 45 19
Full Text Views 90 90 76
PDF Downloads 8 8 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0