Save

The Incompatibility of Phenomenological Data and Dominant Nosological Systems Like DSM-5: Binswanger’s Psychopathological Phenomenology

In: Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Authors:
Albert-Jan van de Pol Department of Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands

Search for other papers by Albert-Jan van de Pol in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Jan Derksen Department of Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jan Derksen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

This essay is a response to proposals to integrate patient-subjective or idiographic data into future versions of nosologies such as the DSM and the ICD. It argues that a nosology is not a suitable vehicle for disseminating psychopathological-phenomenological research results throughout the field. Drawing on the work of Ludwig Binswanger, it examines, on the basis of four postulates, how he applies the Husserlian concept of intentionality in psychiatry and thus arrives at a psychopathological phenomenology. For each individual postulate, we then look in depth at the implications for the current debate around DSM. The conclusion we come to is that, both because of the objective of phenomenological research and because of the complexity of the kind of information involved in findings based on that research, it is impossible to integrate these findings into a nosology without deviating from either them or the nosology itself.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 481 86 6
Full Text Views 116 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 98 7 1