Save

The Limits of Abstraction: Towards a Phenomenologically Reformed Understanding of Science

In: Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Author:
Philipp Berghofer University of Graz Austria

Search for other papers by Philipp Berghofer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Husserl argued that psychology needs to establish an abstraction that is opposite to the abstraction successfully established in the natural sciences. While the natural sciences abstract away the psychological or subjective, psychology must abstract away the physical or worldly. However, Husserl and other phenomenologists such as Iso Kern have argued that there is a crucial systematic disanalogy between both abstractions. While the abstraction of the natural sciences can be performed completely, the abstraction of psychology cannot. In this context, Husserl argues that the psychological reduction leads to paradoxes. In this paper, I critically discuss whether it is true that the natural sciences can successfully abstract away the subjective. Or more precisely, I raise the question of whether they should.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 312 143 11
Full Text Views 130 9 0
PDF Views & Downloads 221 27 0