Achaemenid Creation and Second Isaiah

in Journal of Persianate Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

For many years, scholars have entertained the idea that monotheism appeared in Second Isaiah as a result of Zoroastrian influence. Since the issue of monotheism is inappropriate for either the Persian or the Judaean contexts, this paper argues that a more fruitful angle to pursue the Persian context of Isaiah is through analysis of the concept of creation. This paper takes the Achaemenid creation prologues in the Old Persian inscriptions as a comparator for the use of creation in Second Isaiah, and places these two in a broader ancient Near Eastern context of creation mythology. It is argued that both share distinctive features in the way creation is presented and understood. Given the novel and similar concepts visible in both corpora, it is argued that the vision of creation and form of yhwh as creator are the earliest attested instance of “Iranian influence” on the Judaean tradition.

Achaemenid Creation and Second Isaiah

in Journal of Persianate Studies

Sections

References

  • AhnG., Religiöse Herrscherlegitimation im achämenidischen Iran: Die Voraussetzungen und die Struktur ihrer Argumentation, (Leiden 1992).

  • AlbertzR., From the Exile to the Maccabees vol. 2 A History of Israelite Teligion in the Old Testament Period, (Louisville 1994).

  • BaileyH. W., Zoroastrian Problems in the Ninth-Century Books, (Oxford 1971).

  • BalcerJ. M., A Prosopographical Study of the Ancient Persians Royal and Noble c. 550–450 B.C., (Lewiston 1993).

  • BaltzerK., Deutero-Isaiah: A Commentary on Isaiah 40–55, (Minneapolis 2001).

  • BarstadH. M., The Babylonian Captivity of the Book of Isaiah: “Exilic” Judah and the Provenance of Isaiah 40–55, (Oslo 1997).

  • BartholomaeC., Altiranisches Wörterbuch, (Strassburg 1904).

  • BergmanJ.RingrenH.BernhardtK. H.BottereckG. J., '“ברא bārāʾ”', in G. J. Bottereck and H. Ringgreneds (eds), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, (Grand Rapids 1975) 242-249.

  • BlenkinsoppJ., Isaiah 40–55: a New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, (New York 2002).

  • BlenkinsoppJ., '“The Cosmological and Protological Language of Deutero-Isaiah”' (2011) 73(3) Catholic Biblical Quarterly: 493-510.

  • BoyceM., A History of Zoroastrianism: Under the Achaemenians, (Leiden 1982).

  • BoyceM., '“Persian Religion in the Achaemenid Age”', in W. D. Davies and L. Finkelstein (eds), The Cambridge History of Judaism, (Cambridge 2000) 279-307.

  • BriantP.DanielsP. T., From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, (Winona Lake 2002).

  • BrosiusM., Women in Ancient Persia (559–331 BC), (Oxford 1998).

  • BrueggemannW., Isaiah 40–66, (Louisville 1998).

  • ByrneM.“‘My People Shall Know My Name’: The Divine Designations in the Book of Isaiah as a Hermeneutical Key to the Formation of the Text in its Final Form”2006National University of Ireland Maynoothunpub. Ph.D. diss.

  • CameronG. G., '“The ‘Daiva’ Inscription of Xerxes: In Elamite”' (1954–9) 2(5–6) Die Welt des Orients: 470-476.

  • CarrollR. P., When Prophecy Failed: Cognitive Dissonance in the Prophetic Traditions of the Old Testament, (New York 1979).

  • CarterG. W., Zoroastrianism and Judaism, (New York 1970) 1918 reprint.

  • CheungJ., Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb, (Leiden 2007).

  • DaviesP. R., '“God of Cyrus, God of Israel: Some Religio-Historical Reflections on Isaiah 40–55”', in J. Davies, G. Harvey and W. G. E. Watson (eds), Words Remembered Texts Renewed: Essays in Honour of John F. A. Sawyer, (Sheffield 1995) 207-225.

  • DelitzschF.MartinJ., Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Isaiah, (Edinburgh 1881) col. 2.

  • DelitzschF.DenneyJ., Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Isaiah, (New York 1877) 2 vols.

  • ElligerK., Deuterojesaja 1: Jesaja 401–457, (Neukirchen-Vluyn 1978).

  • GarrisonM. B., '“Royal Achaemenid Iconography”', in D. T. Potts (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran, (Oxford 2013) 566-597.

  • GnoliG., The Idea of Iran: An essay on its Origin, (Rome 1989).

  • GoldingayJ., The Message of Isaiah 40–55: a Literary-Theological Commentary, (London 2005).

  • GranerødG., '“ ‘By the Favour of Ahuramazda I am King’: On the Promulgation of a Persian Propaganda Text among Babylonians and Judaeans”' (2013) 44 Journal for the Study of Judaism: 455-480.

  • GreenfieldJ. C.PortenB.YardeniA., The Bisitun Inscription of Darius the Great: Aramaic Version, (London 1982).

  • HaleM., '“Old Persian Word Order”' (1988) 31(1) Indo-Iranian Journal: 27-40.

  • HeffelfingerK. M., I am Large I Contain Multitudes: Lyric Cohesion and Conflict in Second Isaiah, (Leiden 2011).

  • HenkelmanW. F. M., The Other Gods Who Are: Studies in Elamite-Iranian Acculturation Based on the Persepolis Fortification Texts, (Leiden 2008).

  • HerrenschmidtC., '“Désignation de l’empire et concepts politiques de Darius 1er d’après ses inscriptions en vieux perse”' (1976) 5 Studia Iranica: 33-65.

  • HerrenschmidtC., '“Les créations d’Ahuramazda”' (1977) 6 Studia Iranica: 17-58.

  • HerrenschmidtC., '“Vieux-Perse šiyāti”', in J. Kellens (ed), La religion iranienne à l’époque achéménide, (Ghent 1991) 13-21.

  • HerrenschmidtC., '“Designation of the Empire and its Political Concepts of Darius I according to Old Persian Records”', in T. Daryaee, A. Mousavi and K. Rezakhani (eds), Excavating an Empire: Achaemenid Persia in Longue Durée, (Costa Mesa 2014) 12-36.

  • de JongA., '“Ahura Mazda the Creator”', in J. Curtis and S. Simpson (eds), The World of Achaemenid Persia: History Art and Society in Iran and the Ancient Near East, (London 2010) 85-90.

  • KellensJ., '“Ahura Mazdā n’est pas un dieu créateur”', in C.-H. de Fouchécour and P. Gignoux (eds), Études irano-aryennes offertes à Gilbert Lazard, (Paris 1989) 217-28.

  • KentR. G., Old Persian: Grammar Texts Lexicon, (New Haven 1961).

  • KnäpperK., Die Religion der frühen Achaimeniden in ihrem Verhältnis zum Avesta, (Munich 2011).

  • KochK., '“Ugaritic Polytheism and Hebrew Monotheism in Isaiah 40–55”', in R. P. Gordon (ed), The God of Israel, (Cambridge 2007) 205-228.

  • KooleJ. L.RuniaA. P., Isaiah III.1/Isaiah 40–48, (Kampen 1997).

  • KuhrtA., The Persian Empire: a Corpus of Sources from the Achaemenid Period, (London 2009) single vol. Ed..

  • LecoqP., Les inscriptions de la Perse achéménide: Traduit du vieux perse de l’élamite du babylonien et de l’araméen, (Paris 1997).

  • LenziA., '“The Curious Case of Failed Revelation in Ludlul Bēl Nēmeqi: A New Suggestion for the Poem’s Scholarly Purpose”', in C. L. Crouch, J. Stökl and A. E. Zernecke (eds), Mediating between Heaven and Earth, (London 2012) 36-66.

  • LincolnB., Religion Empire and Torture: the Case of Achaemenian Persia with a Postscript on Abu Ghraib, (Chicago 2007).

  • LincolnB., ‘Happiness for Mankind’: Achaemenian Religion and the Imperial Project, (Leuven 2012).

  • LordA. B., The Singer of Tales, (Cambridge 2000).

  • MillsL. H., Zarathuštra Philo the Achaemenids and Israel, (Leipzig 1905–66).

  • MitchellC., '“A Note on the Creation Formula in Zechariah 12:1–8; Isaiah 42:5–6; and Old Persian Inscriptions”' (2014) 133(2) Journal of Biblical Literature: 305-308.

  • MitchellC., ' “The Testament of Darius (DNa/DNb) and Constructions of Kings and Kingship in 1–2 Chronicles”', in J. M. Silverman and C. Waerzeggers (eds), Political Memory in and after the Persian Empire, (Atlanta 2015) 363-380.

  • NilsenT. D., '“The Creation of Darkness and Evil (Isaiah 45:6c–7)”' (2008) 115(1) Revue Biblique: 5-25.

  • NilsenT. D., '“Creation in Collision? Isaiah 40–48 and Zoroastrianism, Babylonian Religion and Genesis 1”' (2013) 13 Journal of Hebrew Scriptures onlinehttp://www.jhsonline.org/Articles/article_188.pdf.

  • OtzenB., '“יצר yāṣar”', in G. J. Bottereck and H. Ringgren (eds), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, (Grand Rapids 1990) 257-265.

  • PaulS. M., Isaiah 40–66: Translation and Commentary, (Grand Rapids 2012).

  • PompeoF., '“Some Syntactic and Semantic Remarks on XPl 30–31”', in G. P. Basello and A. V. Rossi (eds), Dariosh Studies II: Persepolis and its Settlements: Territorial System and Ideology in the Achaemenid State, (Naples 2012) 155-182.

  • RazmjouS.RoafM., '“Temples and Sacred Places in Persepolis”', in K. Kaniuth (ed), Tempel im Alten Orient, (Wiesbaden 2013) 407-426.

  • RinggrenH., '“עשה ʿāśâ”', in J. Bottereck, H. Ringgren and H.-J. Fabry (eds), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, (Grand Rapids 2001) 387-403.

  • RootM. C., The King and Kingship in Achaemenid Art: Essays on the Creation of an Iconography of Empire, (Leiden 1979).

  • RootM. C., '“Imperial Ideology in the Achaemenid Persian Art: Transforming the Mesopotamian Legacy”' (2000) 35 Bulletin of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies: 19-27.

  • SchmidtE. F., Persepolis III: The Royal Tombs and Other Monuments, (Chicago 1970).

  • SchmittR., The Old Persian Inscriptions of Naqsh-i Rustam and Persepolis, (London 2000).

  • SchmittR.“Personal Names, Iranian iii. Achaemenid Period”Encyclopædia Iranica2005onlinehttp://www.iranica.com/articles/personal-names-iranian-iii-achaemenid

  • SchmittR., Die altpersischen Inschriften der Achaimeniden: editio minor mit Deutscher Übersetzung, (Wiesbaden 2009).

  • SharmaR. S., '“The Aryan Problem and the Horse”' (1993) 21(7–8) Social Scientist: 3-16.

  • SilvermanJ. M., '“On Cultural and Religious Influence”', in J. M. Silverman (ed), A Land Like Your Own: Traditions of Israel and Their Reception, (Eugene 2010) 1-12.

  • SilvermanJ. M., Persepolis and Jerusalem: Iranian Influence on the Apocalyptic Hermeneutic, (London 2012).

  • SilvermanJ. M., '“It’s a Craft! It’s a Cavern! It’s a Castle! Yima’s Vara, Iranian Flood Myths, and Jewish Apocalyptic Traditions”', in J. M. Silverman (ed), Opening Heaven’s Floodgates: The Genesis Flood Narrative Its Contexts and Reception, (Piscataway 2013) 191-230.

  • SilvermanJ. M., '“Was There an Achaemenid ‘Theology’ of Kingship?”', in D. V. Edelman, A. Fitzpatrick-McKinley and P. Guillaume (eds), Religion in the Persian Period: Emerging Trends Judaisms and Other Trends, (Tübingen 2016) 172-196.

  • SimcoxC. E., '“The Role of Cyrus in Deutero-Isaiah”' (1937) 57(2) Journal of the American Oriental Society: 158-171.

  • Sims-WilliamsN., '“The Final Paragraph of the Tomb-Inscription of Darius I (DNb, 50–60): The Old Persian Text in the Light of the Aramaic Version”' (1981) 44 Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies: 1-7.

  • SkjærvøP. O., '“Achaemenid Vispašiyātiš, Sasanian Wispšād”' (1994) 23(1) Studia Iranica: 79-80.

  • SkjærvøP. O., An Introduction to Old Persian, (Cambridge 2002) onlinehttps://www.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/OldPersian/.

  • SkjærvøP. O., '“Old Iranian: Avestan and Old Persian”', in G. Windfuhr (ed), The Iranian Languages, (London 2009) 43-195.

  • SmithM., '“II Isaiah and the Persians”' (1963) 83 Journal of the American Oriental Society: 415-421.

  • SmithM., '“Bible II: Persian Elements in the Bible”', in Encyclopaedia Iranica, (New York 1990) 200-203.

  • StolperM. W., '“Parysatis in Babylon”', in A. K. Guinan (ed), “If a Man Builds a Joyful House”: Assyriological Studies in Honor of Erle Verdun Leichty, (Leiden 2006) 463-472.

  • TavernierJ., Iranica in the Achaemenid Period (ca. 550–330 B.C.): Lexicon of Old Iranian Proper names and Loanwords Attested in Non-Iranian Texts, (Leuven 2007).

  • TiemeyerL.-S., For the Comfort of Zion: The Geographical and Theological Location of Isaiah 40–55, (Leiden 2011).

  • VallatF., '“Darius: the Great King”', in J. Perrot (ed), The Palace of Darius at Susa: The Great Royal Residence of Achaemenid Persia, (London 2013a) 29-52.

  • VallatF., '“The Main Achaemenid Inscriptions of Susa”', in J. Perrot (ed), The Palace of Darius at Susa: The Great Royal Residence of Achaemenid Persia, (London 2013b) 281-295.

  • WeissbachF. H., Die Keilinschriften der Achämeniden, (Leipzig 1911).

  • WestermannC.StakerD. M. G., Isaiah 40–66, (Philadelphia 1969).

  • WüstW., Altpersische Studien: Sprach- und Kulturgeschichtliche Beiträge zum Glossar der Achämeniden-Inschriften, (Munich 1966).

  • 8

    See for example Delitzsch 1881220 = Delitzsch [1877] II 174; Mills 1905–6 276–7; Simcox 1937 169; Carter 1970 50–1; Bergman et al. 1975 248; Otzen 1990 264; Albertz 1994 418; Ringgren 2001 391; Smith 1990 201; Boyce 2000 283. Earlier however Boyce thought it was instead similar to Y. 44 (Boyce 1982 44). Blenkinsopp (2002 250) claims this interpretation cannot be ruled out but he later rejects it (Blenkinsopp 2011 499 n. 21 506). It has become more common to reject a direct polemic; e.g. Elliger 1978 501–2; Koole 1997 441; Nilsen 2008 22–25 and Nilsen 2013 6 reject any relevance of Zoroastrianism. Paul (2012 257) notes that Saʿadyah Gaʾon already saw an anti-Dualist polemic here (though Paul rejects it). A couple of critics still see it as anti-dualist however without specifying whose or which dualism they mean. Westermann (1969 162) says against all dualisms as does Baltzer (2001 227). Goldingay (2005 269) only sees “latent” dualism here.

  • 12

    The exception is Mitchell 2014305–308. Smith (1963 420) citing oral communications with Bickermann briefly noted the appearance of creation in an inscription of Xerxes but failed either to take it into account or to note that it in fact appears in Darius’s inscriptions. Blenkinsopp (2011 503) briefly notes its appearance but makes no use of it in the article. A perusal of the handbooks on ancient Near Eastern creation or mythology shows that they routinely leave Iran out.

  • 14

    Lincoln 201210 cites 23 though only 21 in OP. These are DEa DNa DNb DPd DSe DSf DSt DSab DZc XEa XPa XPb XPc XPd XPf XPh XPl XVa D2Ha A2Hc A3Pa cf. DSi.

  • 25

    Lincoln 2012 10 447. Kellens (1989) argues that in OAv. dā- does not signify “create” but “put in place” but refrains from certainty in terms of Old Persian (228 n. 20). Even if this is true for Old Persian as well the semantic distinction remains.

  • 26

    See Hale 198829; Skjærvø 2009 96–8. Kent (1961 96 §310) does not comment on this. Pompeo (2012 166–9) thinks rather that this placement disambiguates between “give” and “create” for the root dā-.

  • 28

    Herrenschmidt 1976reprinted in English in Herrenschmidt 2014 24; Herrenschmidt 1977. Though the precise argumentation Herrenschmidt uses to reach this conclusion is unconvincing the parallelism and usages confirm the basic insight.

  • 31

    Lincoln 2012262–265. Sims-Williams (1981 6) retroverts the attested Aramaic ṭuvkhā to šiyātiyā; he is followed by Schmitt 2009 111 (here §12).

  • 38

    DSa. DSf. DSi DSo DSz. Cf. Lincoln 201250–1.

  • 39

    Y. 30:7–9; Yt. 19:11; cf. Bailey 1971viii–xvi.

  • 41

    See Lincoln 2012174–5. Text and translation in Weissbach 1911 85–7; translation in Lecoq 1997 229–230; Kuhrt 2009 483.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 55 55 3
Full Text Views 186 186 2
PDF Downloads 12 12 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0