The middle of the eighteenth century reportedly witnessed the emergence of the new literary movement in Persian poetry, called the “bāzgasht-e adabi,” or literary return, which rejected the seventeenth-century mainstream Indian or tāza-guʾi style. This literary movement recently merits increased attention from many scholars who are interested in wider Persianate cultures. This article explores the reception of this movement in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Iran and the role played by the Qajar royal court in it, mainly by the analysis of a specific sub-genre of tazkeras, called “royal-commissioned tazkeras,” which were produced from the reign of the second Qajar monarch Fath-ʿAli Shāh onward. A main focus will be on the reciprocal relationship between the court poets/literati and the shah, which presumably somehow affected our understanding of Persian literature today.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Y. Āriyanpur, Az Sabā tā nimā: Tārikh-e 150 sāl-e adab-e Fārsi, 2 vols., 5th ed., Tehran, 1993/1372sh.
Nezāmi ʿAruzi-Samarqandi, Chahār maqāla, ed. M. Moʿin, 12th ed., Tehran, 2001/1380sh.
Lotf-ʿAli Beg Beygdeli Āzar, Āteshkada (nima-ye avval), ed. H. Sādāt-e Nāseri, 3 vols., Tehran, 1957/1336sh., 1959/1338sh., 1961/1340sh.
Lotf-ʿAli Beg Beygdeli Āzar, Āteshkada (nima-ye dovvom), ed. H. Mohaddeth, Tehran, 1999/1378sh.
M. Bahār, “Bāzgasht-e adabi,” in M. Golbon, ed., Bahār va adab-e Fārsi, vol. 1, Tehran, 1976/1355sh., reprint 2003/1382sh, pp. 43–66. (Originally in Majalla-ye Armaghān 13 (1932/1311sh.), 14 (1932/1312sh).)
Bahman Mirzā Qājār, Tazkera-ye Mohammad Shāhi, Ketābkhāna-ye Majles, ms. 902.
E. G. Browne, A Literary History of Persia, 4 vols., Cambridge, 1924.
Amir Dowlatshāh Samarqandi, Tazkerat al-shoʿarāʾ, ed. E. Browne, London, 1901.
A. Dudney, “Sabk-e Hendi and the Crisis of Authority in Eighteenth-Century Indo-Persian Poetics,” Journal of Persianate Studies 9.1 (2016), pp. 60–82.
A. Erkinov, “Les timourides, modèles de légitimité, et les recueils poétiques de Kokand,” in F. Richard and M. Szuppe, eds., Écrit et culture en Asie centrale et dans le monde turco-iranien, Xe–XIXe siècles, Cahiers de Studia Iranica 40, Paris, 2009, pp. 285–330.
Fath-ʿAli Shāh Qājār Khāqān, Divān-e Khāqān: Tahqiq darbāre-ye zendegāni, ahvāl, aʿmāl, afkār, va divān-e kāmel-e ashʿār-e Fath-ʿAli Shāh Qājār “Khāqān,” ed. H. Gol-Mohammadi, Tehran, 1991/1370sh.
Abuʾl-Hasan Ghaffāri-Kāshāni, Golshan-e Morād, ed. Gh. Tabātabāʾi-Majd, Tehran, 1990/1369sh.
A. Golchin-Maʿāni, Tārikh-e Tazkera-hā-ye Fārsi. 2 vols, Tehran, 1969/1348sh, 1971/1350sh.
H. Gol-Mohammadi, preface to Divān-e Khāqān, Tehran, 1991/1370sh.
Akhtar Gorji, Tazkera-ye Akhtar, ed. A. Khayyāmpur, Tabriz, 1964/1343sh.
Akhtar Gorji, Tazkera Akhmada Gordzhii Akhtara “Andzhoman-ara,” ed. L. G. Akhmedzhanova, Moscow, 1986.
W. Hanaway, “Bāzgašt-e adabi,” in EIr., vol. 4, fasc, 1, London/New York City, 1990, pp. 58–60; online: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bazgast-e-adabi.
Fakhri Haravi, Rowzat al-salātin, ed. A. Khayyāmpur, Tabriz, 1966/1345sh.
Rezāqoli Khān Hedāyat, Majmaʿ al-fosahāʾ. ed. M. Mosaffā, 6 vols., 2nd ed., Tehran, 2003/1382sh.
Mohammad Sādeq Marvazi Homā, Zinat al-madāʾeh. Ketābkhāna-ye Majles, ms. 2523.
A. Khātami, Tārikh-e adabiyāt-e Īrān dar dowra-ye bāzgasht-e adabi: Az soqut-e Safaviyya tā esteqrār-e mashruta, vol. 2, 1994/1373sh.
M. Kia, “Imaging Iran before Nationalism: Geocultural Meanings of Land in Azar’s Ateshkadah,” in K. S. Aghaie and A. Marashi, eds., Rethinking Iranian Nationalism and Modernity, Austin, 2014, pp. 89–112.
N. Kondo, “The Vaqf and the Religious Patronage of Manuchehr Khān Muʿtamad al-Dawlah,” in R. Gleave, ed., Religion and Society in Qajar Iran, London and New York, 2005, pp. 227–244.
N. Kondo, “Perushiago shijinden no keifu (Genealogy of Persian Tazkeras),” in K. Morimoto, ed. Perushiago ga musunda sekai: Mohitotsuno yurashiashi (The World Tied by the Persian Language: A New Framework for Eurasian History), Hokkaido, 2009, pp. 39–65 (Japanese).
N. Kondo, “17, 18 seiki perushiago shijinden kaidai (A Commentary on 17- and 18th-Century Persian Tazkeras),” in N. Kondo, ed., Perushiago bunkakneshikenkyu no saizensen (New Perspectives on the History of Persianate Societies), Tokyo, 2011, pp. 87–98 (Japanese).
Sh. Langarudi, Maktab-e bāzgasht. 2nd ed., Tehran, 1996/1375sh.
P. Losensky, Welcoming Fighānī: Imitation and Poetic Individuality in the Safavid-Mughal Ghazal, Costa Mesa, 1998.
P. Luft, “Qajar Rock Reliefs,” Iranian Studies 34.1–4 (2001), pp. 31–49.
ʿAbd al-Razzāq Donboli Maftun, Negārestān-e Dārā, ed. A. Khayyāmpur, Tabriz, 1964/1343sh.
ʿAbd al-Razzāq Donboli Maftun, Tajrebat al-ahrār va tasliyat al-abrār, vol. 1, ed. H. Qāzi-Tabātabāʾi, Tabriz, 1970/1349sh.
Mahmud Mirzā Qājār, Safinat al-Mahmud, 2 vols., ed. A. Khayyāmpur, Tabriz, 1968/1346sh.
J. Meisami, Medieval Persian Court Poetry, Princeton, 1987.
J. Perry “The Last Safavids, 1722–1773,” Iran 9.1 (1971), pp. 59–69.
Abu al-Qāsem Farāhāni Qāʾem-Maqām, Monshaʾāt-e Qāʾem-Maqām Farāhāni, ed. R. Yaghmāʾi, 2nd ed., Tehran, 1994/1373sh.
Fāzel Khān Garrusi Rāvi, Anjoman-e Khāqān, Tehran, 1997/1376sh. (Ms. Majles Library, no. 908).
J. Rypka, “History of Persian Literature up to the beginning of the 20th Century,” in J. Rypka and K. Jahn, eds., History of Iranian Literature, Dordrecht, 1968, pp. 69–351.
Fath-ʿAli Khān Kāshāni Malek al-shoʿarāʾ Sabā, Shāhanshāh-nāma, Ketābkhāna-ye Markazi-ye Dāneshgāh-e Tehrān, ms. 103.
Fath-ʿAli Khān Kāshāni Malek al-shoʿarāʾ Sabā, Shāhanshāh-nāma. British Library, ms. io Islamic 3442.
K. Schwarz, “The Local Lives of a Transregional Poet: ʿAbd al-Qāder Bidel and the Writing of Persianate Literary History,” Journal of Persianate Studies 9.1 (2016), pp. 83–106.
M. Shafiʿi-Kadkani, “Persian Literature (Belles-Lettres) from the Time of Jami to the Present Day,” in G. Morrison, J. Baldick, and M. Shafiʿi Kadkani, eds., History of Persian Literature from the Beginning of the Islamic Period to the Present Day, Leiden-Köln, 1981, pp. 133–206.
S. Sharma, “Redrawing the Boundaries of ʿAjam in Early Modern Persian Literary Histories,” in A. Amanat and F. Vejdani, eds., Iran Facing Others: Identity Boundaries in a Historical Perspective, New York, 2012, pp. 49–62.
Mir ʿAbd Allāh Shushtari, Tohfat al-ʿālam va zeyl al-tohfa, ed. S. Moʾahhed, Tehran, 1984/1363sh.
M. C. Smith, “Literary Connections: Bahār’s Sabkshenāsi and Bāzgasht-e Adabi,” Journal of Persianate Studies 2.2 (2009), pp. 194–209.
T. Sobhāni, “Fāzel Khān Garrusi va Anjoman-e Khāqān,” preface to Anjoman-e Khāqān, Tehran, 1997/1376sh.
CA.h. Storey, Persian Literature, vol. 1, pt. 2. London, 1953.
M. Subtelny, The Poetic Circle at the Court of the Timurid, Sultan Husain Baiqara, and its Political Significance, unpub. Ph. D diss., Harvard University, 1979.
Eskandar Beg Torkaman, Tārikh-e ʿĀlam-ārā-ye ʿAbbāsi, ed. Iraj Afshār, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Tehran, 1961/1350sh.
A. Vanzan, “Literati and Society in Zand and Early Qājār Iran according to Ahmad Gorji Akhtar’s Taẕkereh-ye Anjoman ārā,” Irānshenāsi 9.3 (Autumn 1997), pp. 37–52.
E. Yarshater, “The Indian or Safavid Style: Progress or Decline,” in E. Yarshater, ed., Persian Literature, Albany, 1988, pp. 249–288.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 219 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 773 | 137 | 12 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 346 | 52 | 4 |
The middle of the eighteenth century reportedly witnessed the emergence of the new literary movement in Persian poetry, called the “bāzgasht-e adabi,” or literary return, which rejected the seventeenth-century mainstream Indian or tāza-guʾi style. This literary movement recently merits increased attention from many scholars who are interested in wider Persianate cultures. This article explores the reception of this movement in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Iran and the role played by the Qajar royal court in it, mainly by the analysis of a specific sub-genre of tazkeras, called “royal-commissioned tazkeras,” which were produced from the reign of the second Qajar monarch Fath-ʿAli Shāh onward. A main focus will be on the reciprocal relationship between the court poets/literati and the shah, which presumably somehow affected our understanding of Persian literature today.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 219 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 773 | 137 | 12 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 346 | 52 | 4 |